A recent reworking of
language concerning climate change on a Wisconsin government website could be replicated under a Trump administration.
Not exact matches
Whereas the Niebuhrian generation was
concerned that what is said theologically make sense in the intellectual
climate shaped by modern thought, the new approach is to recognize that all thought is a function of
language, and that all
language is culturally specific.
Still, Ms. Holzer's way with
language, morality and history — alternately poetic and withering, and expressed in incised stone benches or on silk - screen paintings of redacted government documents
concerning the dark side of recent wars — has a renewed and tragic force in the current political
climate.
Phil Mote, director of the Oregon
Climate Change Research Institute at Oregon State University, is skeptical of McPherson's predictions: «I've been connected to national and international assessments of the state of the science of climate change, and although my colleagues and I are generally very concerned about what challenges climate change is bringing to humankind, no expert that I have read has used language like «extinction of the human race.
Climate Change Research Institute at Oregon State University, is skeptical of McPherson's predictions: «I've been connected to national and international assessments of the state of the science of
climate change, and although my colleagues and I are generally very concerned about what challenges climate change is bringing to humankind, no expert that I have read has used language like «extinction of the human race.
climate change, and although my colleagues and I are generally very
concerned about what challenges
climate change is bringing to humankind, no expert that I have read has used language like «extinction of the human race.
climate change is bringing to humankind, no expert that I have read has used
language like «extinction of the human race.»
Concerning text on the Medieval
Climate Anomaly, Belgium and Ireland underscored that this phenomenon was regional in nature, unlike global warming in late 20th century, and suggested clarifying
language to reflect this.
These days, Abbott is more careful with his
language but his appointments to cabinet and his policy positions say much about the extent of his
concern for the risks of human caused
climate change.
I imagine my Prime Minister, Copenhagen time, would not have said, «Flat earthers», «anti-science sceptics», nor ’50 days to save the earth» or other ministers using the D word, and the then UK Minister of State for Energy and
Climate, calling sceptics — «climate sabatouers» with the obvious (terrorist) concerns over that language, on a mere hypo
Climate, calling sceptics — «
climate sabatouers» with the obvious (terrorist) concerns over that language, on a mere hypo
climate sabatouers» with the obvious (terrorist)
concerns over that
language, on a mere hypothesis.
Chief among those is what policy makers will actually do with a document that voices
concern over
climate change with even stronger
language than before, and with greater resolution on predictions about global sea - level rise.
My biggest
concern about the
climate report is that it presents a number of speculative, and sometimes incomplete, conclusions embedded in
language that gives them more scientific heft than they deserve.
Advancing his own profession as a social scientist, Fischhoff expresses his
concern that the
climate scientists» advocacy «might be like shouting at people who speak a different
language, thus losing their trust while conveying little content, resulting in unpersuasive communication.»