Not exact matches
I aim to get at some
of the theological underpinnings
of that unease in
language that may seem unfamiliar or even unwelcome, but it is
language that is grounded in important Christian
affirmations that seek to understand the child as our equal» one who is a gift and not a product.
After reading Gary Chapman's best - selling book, The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts, I discovered my love
language is words
of affirmation.
The recognition
of the limits
of language and human knowledge when we speak about the divine is at the same time an
affirmation of the mystery
of God.
You know all
of that, but you're still able to hear these as true stories, as metaphorical narratives using ancient archetypal
language to make, among other
affirmations, that Jesus is the light coming into the darkness, to make the
affirmation that the Herods
of this world constantly seek to destroy that which is born
of God.
It is an
affirmation and not, as many conservative evangelicals have reflexively assumed, a questioning
of biblical authority when the
language of liberation and empowerment prove fruitful in understanding further dimensions
of what salvation always meant according to the scriptural witness, even though we had not previously been pushed to see it that clearly.
There are four
affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone
of our bone and flesh
of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one
of us faces — thus Christology, statement
of the significance
of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional
language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word
of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness
of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point
of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life
of God and effective among humankind.
I feel a warm glow and a sense
of affirmation when I learn
of churches which are eliminating sexist
language from their worship services and liturgy,
of ministers who are studying and preaching about feminist theology and the Mother - Father God,
of consciousness - raising groups and task forces on sexism in the church.
But
of course the creedal statement, hallowed as it is by centuries
of use during the celebration
of the Eucharist, can be understood only when it is seen as a combination
of supposedly historical data, theological
affirmation put in a quasi-philosophical idiom, and a good deal
of symbolic
language (with the use
of such phrases as «came down from heaven», «ascended into heaven», and the like).
(By «catholic and orthodox» I mean
affirmation of the substance, if not the
language,
of the ecumenical creeds
of the undivided church.)
The first, can appear the model
of pure a priori thought, disengaged from the world
of experience; the second, a massive collection
of detailed descriptions and theories about the enormous variety
of material phenomena, but with no intelligible unity; and the third an obscure and generally unrigorous rhapsody
of affirmations and aspirations, at one end couched in the
languages of politics and sentimentality, and at the other in the terms
of a cosmic poetry unregulated by science or philosophy.
They are not excluded from
affirmations about God, but they are much more likely to concern themselves with images
of God or
language about God than with God.
And again, through the work
of other scholars like Bultmann and Buri, with their frank recognition
of the mythological element in the biblical story, we have come to see that the
affirmations of Scripture have their abiding significance, not in spite
of, but precisely because
of their being stated in
language which can only be described as highly metaphorical.
But we must reflect more on the New Testament
affirmations in the light
of ever - changing understandings
of history,
language and literature and the psyche in order to see how these
affirmations might be substantiated.
Now what sort
of language is this
affirmation of faith?
Thus they are not only
affirmations of faith, but the
language of defiance and ultimate resistance.
Study group participants generally agree that at least one central
affirmation of the creed's father - son
language involves the generative relation
of the first to the second person
of the Trinity: the second person comes «
of the same stuff» and is not a creature.
It's possible that while his
language is affection hers may be gifts or words
of affirmation.
I'm definitely not a words
of affirmation love
language but my husband is so this is one I've had to learn a lot about.
Do you have any advice on how to love (or how not to love) a person whose love
language is Words
of Affirmation??
I suspect that physical touch is one
of Avery's top 3 love
languages, along with quality time and words
of affirmation.
Especially if your child's love
language is words
of affirmation and time, he / she will thrive on your spending time with them.
If your child has Words
of Affirmation as his primary love
language, criticism cuts deep.
The five love
languages are words
of affirmation, acts
of service, receiving gifts, quality time, and physical touch.
My primary love
language is words
of affirmation; my wife's is quality time.
While he liked getting a note in his lunch, it doesn't attach the same importance as it does to someone who's love
language is «words
of affirmation.»
Words
of affirmations are a
language of love.
My oldest son, I mentioned above, is also fluent in the «words
of affirmation» love
language.
Each one
of us has one main love
language and a secondary love
language: gifts, quality time, words
of affirmation, acts
of service (devotion), and physical touch (intimacy).
That means, if one spouse's «
language of love» is to do helpful things or buy gifts, and the other's love
language is verbal
affirmations, loving touch, or quality time together, the receiver doesn't really feel love, and the giver doesn't feel appreciated for the love they're giving.
They need constant
affirmation and a sense
of confidence — not just in words, but in actions and body
language — from their parents that they can do pretty much anything!
And the
language is ambiguous and I'll let you talk about how it's — for some people it's an
affirmation of a Ptolemaic worldview or universe view, solar system view for others, it's an embracing
of the new Copernican view.
Dr. Chapman says that each
of us has two dominant love
languages of the five: physical touch, receiving gifts, acts
of service, quality time, and words
of affirmation.
My main love
language is acts
of service, followed closely by words
of affirmation.
It's based on a book that describes how we all (apparently) have a primary and secondary love
language from these five: gifts, quality time, words
of affirmation, acts
of service, and physical touch.
So the first love
language we can hit is words
of affirmation.
Basically there are 5 love
languages: words
of affirmation, quality time, gifts, acts
of service, and physical touch.
My love
language is «words
of affirmation» and I am forever chasing that gold star, which is exactly what this app gives you when you accomplish a goal!
«His love
language is «words
of affirmation» and those come pretty hard for me, so it is easier when I get to type him a random «thank you for being amazing» during the day, because I know it makes him happy.
Chapman's theory is really quite straightforward: he believes that the many, many ways in which people express emotional love can be condensed down into five broad categories or «
languages» (receiving gifts, acts
of service, words
of affirmation, physical touch, and quality time).
Showing our love can be channeled through different «love
languages» (as outlined by Gary Chapman), including spending quality time together, gift giving, physical touch, acts
of service, and words
of affirmation.
When one person's primary love
language is «gifts» and the other's is «words
of affirmation», they are each speaking a foreign «love
language» to their partner.
The five primary
languages of love include words
of affirmation, receiving gifts, acts
of service, quality time, and physical touch.
The five love
languages are: receiving gifts, quality time, words
of affirmation, acts
of service, and touch.
While working as a marriage counselor for more than 30 years, he identified five love
languages: Words
of Affirmation, Quality Time, Receiving Gifts, Acts
of Service, and Physical Touch.
For Pendleton, abstraction is not a dead, empty visual
language, and appropriation is not a form
of meaningless relativism, but rather a charged set
of assumptions and strategies that, when displaced, offer 21st - century viewers a vital
affirmation of the possibility
of new orders and narratives.
He doesn't describe the world we know — i.e. he doesn't focus on the scaffolding, in which we communally invest, through
language and social order to run our lives — an approach that delivers the comforting satisfaction
of affirmation and recognition.
They cut into the shape structure more to become shapes in their own right, For me they are an
affirmation of non objective colour painting that looks toward a new pictorial
language and one which connects abstract painting to it's history.
The paintings invite the lines
of the circle and the ellipse to join with a
language of painting that celebrates the materiality
of color and light, the juxtaposition
of the anticipated with the unexpected, and the
affirmation of depth by close attention to process.
Has it noticed that a supermajority
of Parties understand the absence
of new equity
language as an
affirmation of the original, and take the Convention's
language to remain entirely operational?
This tradition
of an
affirmation as an exception is reflected in current statutory
language.