The language of catastrophe is not the language of science.
Mike Hulme's remarks about overuse of
the language of catastrophe are interesting, and to an extent I'd agree with him.
At times, this «alarming» story morphs into the more «alarmist»
language of catastrophe, calamity or doom.
Not exact matches
It's a science - fiction film in J.G. Ballard's barest definition
of the genre — an exploration
of time, space, and identity set in the near future in a cloud
of languages and ideas — that periodically soars like invention can when it's raised from a foundation
of familiar
catastrophe and intimate calamity.
Many educators and political leaders warned that the passage
of Proposition 227 would be a
catastrophe for the one in four California students who do not speak English as their primary
language.
English after all is a
catastrophe of a
language.
I don't remember if you folks have done a post on the
language and typology
of «
catastrophes» and «abrupt change,» but it might be a good idea, if you can find the time.
Provided a fellow academic wears left - wing clothes (speaks the
language of the left: political correctness, identity politics, social justice, climate
catastrophe...) they are given a free ride in academic publishing.
In a paper being published in the March - April edition
of the journal Environment, Matthew C. Nisbet, a professor
of communications at American University, said Mr. Gore's approach, focusing on
language of crisis and
catastrophe, could actually be serving the other side in the fight.
«There has been over-claiming or exaggeration, or at the very least casual use
of language by scientists, some
of whom are quite prominent,» Professor Hulme told BBC News -LSB-...] «My argument is about the dangers
of science over-claiming its knowledge about the future and in particular presenting tentative predictions about climate change using words
of «disaster», «apocalypse» and «
catastrophe»,» he said.
Some observers worried that the mainstream media were promoting a
language of crisis and looming
catastrophe that fitted poorly with the gradual nature
of the actual problem.