Not exact matches
The genuinely «disclosive» character
of much recent linguistic and phenomenological study
of religious
language as a limit -
language disclosing certain authentic limit - experiences encourages me in the further
belief that more «
personal» experiential evidence is also available.
With my
belief that»
language is limited» since I have many many friends who have english as a second
language, and my own
personal comprehension
of the
language and its meanings is limited based on my
personal history... thank you for being thoroughly clear in your use
of words.
All but two states — Mississippi and West Virginia — allow religious exemptions, and 19 states, including California, offer some variation
of a philosophical or «
personal belief» exemption, depending on the law's
language.
The number
of students who are aware
of school cliques based on any
of the following: academic ability, athletic ability,
beliefs, ethnicity, family income, gender, hobbies / interests, home neighborhood, primary
language spoken, musical interest,
personal appearance, race, sexual orientation, and / or style.
The number
of students who have ever been part
of a group that rejected others, based on academic ability, athletic ability,
beliefs, ethnicity, family income, gender, hobbies / interests, home neighborhood, primary
language spoken, musical interest,
personal appearance, race, sexual orientation, or style.
The number
of students who have felt unwelcome or rejected by a particular group because
of their academic ability, athletic ability,
beliefs, ethnicity, family income, gender, hobbies / interests, home neighborhood, primary
language spoken, musical interest,
personal appearance, race, sexual orientation, or style.
Tom, Part
of the problem is that people have started to adopt the Bayesian estimates as their
personal beliefs, and dressing it up in this
language enables them to present it to the anti-Bayesians (
of which there is still a substantial body) without the latter actually understanding what went into the sausage factory... Here is an random example
of someone (cited in that IPCC figure) saying as the result
of their simple analysis «there is a 70 percent chance that [sensitivity] exceeds the maximum IPCC value».