The first, can appear the model
of pure a priori thought, disengaged from the world
of experience; the second, a massive collection
of detailed descriptions and theories about the enormous variety
of material phenomena, but with no intelligible unity; and the third an obscure and generally unrigorous rhapsody
of affirmations and aspirations, at one end couched in the
languages of politics and sentimentality, and at the other in the terms
of a cosmic poetry unregulated by
science or philosophy.
He urged them to plead for «sound
science» a twist
of language of the sort that George Orwell once said was «designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance
of solidarity to
pure wind.»