But they believed they could work with the kinds of tools employed in evolutionary ecology to answer important questions about
language prehistory.
Not exact matches
All of a sudden, there's an explosion of complex artifacts, symbolic representation, measurement of celestial events, complex social structures — a burst of creative activity that almost every expert on
prehistory assumes must have been connected with the sudden emergence of
language.
«The study of the Dravidian
languages is crucial for understanding
prehistory in Eurasia, as they played a significant role in influencing other
language groups,» explains corresponding author Annemarie Verkerk of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
Their model, presented recently in the journal Current Biology, gives researchers a renewed opportunity to trace words and
languages back to their earliest common ancestor or ancestors - potentially thousands of years further into
prehistory than previous techniques can do with any statistical rigor.
«Based on linguistic analysis including computational phylogenetics,» Sicoli writes, «we suggest the
prehistory of South Alaska, the Aleutian Islands, and the Pacific Northwest Coast involved intensive
language contacts, including
language shifts from now extinct
languages that we can infer through typological features, grammar and vocabulary found in
languages documented in historic periods.»
Special emphasis is given to research in the areas of integrative neuro - sciences, medical imaging, translational immunology and cancer research, microbiology and infection research, biochemistry and pharmaceutical research, plant molecular biology, geo - and environmental research, astro - and elementary particle physics, quantum physics and nanotechnology, archeology and
prehistory, historical science, religion and cultures,
language and cognition, media and educational research.