The doctor provided the plaintiff with a medical release waiver that authorized the doctor and «whomever he / she (they) may designate as his / her assistants, to perform the following operative or diagnostic procedure (s): total
laparoscopic hysterectomy.»
During the course of the plaintiff's treatment, the defendant recommended that the plaintiff undergo a total
laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Firoozeh Dumas, who wrote the article, underwent
a laparoscopic hysterectomy in Germany.
Not exact matches
The last 15 years have seen a rise in the use of minimally invasive laparoscopy to perform
hysterectomy, enabled by the use of power morcellators, which break uterine fibroids into small pieces to be removed via tiny
laparoscopic incisions.
There are three primary approaches for
hysterectomy surgery: abdominal, vaginal, and
laparoscopic.
Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal
hysterectomy versus radical abdominal
hysterectomy — a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements.
The plaintiff underwent a
laparoscopic total
hysterectomy and consented to the risks and benefits of the surgery.
Laparoscopic Power Morcellator — In 2014, the FDA issued a black box warning for these devices recommending doctors be knowledgeable of the risks of using the device for the removal of fibroid tumors or for
hysterectomies.