Not exact matches
A good example
of this would be a weight
loss advertisement or advertorial in which the writer claims to have lost a
large amount of body
fat in two months, or a customer claiming that their face looked 10 years younger in just two weeks.
You won't find any low -
fat foods here as manufacturers often compensate for the
loss of fat with
large amounts of sugar and additives.
It also provides a whopping 28 grams
of protein and
large amounts of calcium, iron, selenium, and vitamin A. Getting enough calcium in your diet will strengthen your bones, improve cardiovascular health, and promote
fat loss.
And if you boil them and then allow them to cool for a while, they will form
large amounts of resistant starch, which is a fiber - like substance that has been shown to support
fat loss.
Don't go too crazy with
large amounts of carbohydrates, our main goal is to increase
fat loss so you don't want to consume
large amounts of starches.
I don't have any data to back this up but if I had to guess I would say maybe 0.00001 %
of the female population is blessed to have the cocktail
of hormones that naturally induce
large amounts of muscle mass and
fat loss.
In very short form (recognizing that I will write somewhat loosely for purposes
of brevity in this setting), Weitzman's central claim is that the probability distribution
of potential
losses from global warming is «
fat - tailed», or includes high enough odds
of very
large amounts of warming (200C or more) to justify taking expensive action now to avoid these low probability / high severity risks.