A large consensus paper was recently written by a bunch of these individuals who have the intellectual heft on the social science kind of research that is being done.
Not exact matches
«Not a single
paper in a
large sample of peer - reviewed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 refuted the
consensus position, summarized by the National Academy of Sciences, that «most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.
10: Given that the authors of the
largest ever survey of peer - reviewed opinion in learned
papers marked only 64 of 11,944
papers, or 0.5 %, as stating they agreed with the official «
consensus» proposition that recent warming was mostly manmade, on what rational, evidence - based, scientific ground is it daily asserted that «97 % of scientists» believe recent global warming is not only manmade but dangerous?
One thing to remember is that if a theory has
consensus, it's likely that a
large number of
papers won't bother to endorse it any further.
Among the
larger sample size of author self - rated
papers in categories 1 and 7 (237 in total), 228 (96 %) endorsed the
consensus view that humans are causing most of the current global warming.
First introduced in 2008 in a white
paper published under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, the core of this invention is «distributed trust» that can achieve
consensus amongst strangers on a
large scale.
The results presented in this
paper are the product of a
larger modified Delphi (Dalkey in Studies in the quality of life, Lexington Books, Lexinton, MA, 1972) study designed to reach
consensus regarding the current definition, scope, and practice of MedFT.