Sentences with phrase «large human influence»
The only question,» he said in an interview, «is how large the human influence is relative to other things.»
https://www.climatecentral.org/ Not exact matches
To secure a larger combined influence for the Churches of Christ in all matters affecting the moral and social condition of the people, so as to promote the application of the law of Christ in every relation to human life.»
As in the human example, not only must the nature of the event be appropriate in order to have a special act of God, God's intention must also have a sufficiently large influence in determining the nature of the action.
If the human stream of occasions of dominating awareness is to be influenced by many regions of the brain at once, and is in turn to exercise control over many such regions, it must be directly in touch (both spatially and temporally) with large portions of the brain.
The pressure of the church in a society should help reduce the tension between spiritual freedom and social morality and therefore the influence of the church in society should produce a larger community which also may be spoken as a first fruits of the Future, God intends for human beings.
From such influences came an established doctrine, the orthodoxy of a large part of the Old Testament, that all human suffering presupposes corresponding sin.
This being the case, so the reasoning went, humans also had complete power to influence and change both small and large details of their world.
How it works: To measure the way malaria is transmitted, the computers simulate large human populations, varying biological and social parameters that influence the distribution of the disease.
Courses often cover legal issues, like how to handle research involving human subjects, rather than examining how funding may influence scientists or how cutting - edge research such as genetic engineering may affect society at large.
«This is by far the largest twin study of gene expression ever published, enabling us to make a roadmap of genes versus environment,» Sullivan says, adding that the study measured relationships with disease more precisely than had been previously possible, and uncovered important connections to recent human evolution and genetic influence in disease.
For more than a decade, the husband - and - wife team has been investigating how a large protein complex called SAGA, which helps control gene activity in organisms from yeast to humans, influences developmental processes.
«If, due to human influence, a large fraction of the [insect] migrant population is wiped out, it might have catastrophic consequences for those particular ecosystems.»
«Weather systems are large, and our inputs as humans are so small you'd think we'd have no influence at all,» says Ross N. Hoffman, chief scientist and vice president of research and development at Atmospheric and Environmental Research (AER), based in Lexington, Massachusetts.
Because of large natural variability, the first approach results in an outcome suggesting that it is appropriate to conclude that there is no increase in precipitation by human influences, although the correct interpretation is that there is simply not enough evidence (not a long enough time series).
Studying the severe drought in São Paulo, the largest city in South America with a population of about 20 million, a team led by Friederike Otto found that human - induced climate change was not a major influence.
We use large - scale explorations of genetic influences on high - dimensional metabolomic profiles to define the in vivo blueprint and connectivity of human metabolism.
This is addressed by evaluating change in global or large - scale patterns in the frequency or intensity of extremes (e.g., observed widespread intensification of precipitation extremes attributed to human influence, increase in frequency and intensity of hot extremes) and by event attribution methods.
By its placement in the film, it appears that I am saying that since carbon dioxide exists in the ocean in such large quantities, human influence must not be very important — diametrically opposite to the point I was making — which is that global warming is both real and threatening in many different ways, some unexpected.
Jolie may very well not be conscious of the larger implications of her work, or the influences that even bring it about, but it is impossible not to see Unbroken in the context of official US efforts on the «human rights» and other fronts.
The scientific journal Future Human Image is a platform for large - scale interdisciplinary research of features of modern influence of the social environment on structurally and functionally developing mentality of new generations.
Human physicians are coming to realize that the vast number of micro organisms that naturally live in the large intestine have a tremendous influence on general health.
Birds and Cats FWS claims that «free - roaming cats kill at least one billion birds every year in the U.S., representing one of the largest single sources of human - influenced mortality for small native wildlife,» [1] supporting the assertion with just three sources, one of which is Rich Stallcup's 1991 article from the Observer, a publication of the Point Reyes Bird Observatory.
Just like with humans, the quality of what a puppy eats has a large influence on their health.
These works are familiar from art history texts because their large, concave faces; stylized features; inventively worked bronze and copper surfaces; and ineffably human geometries exerted a crucial influence on early French Modernism, starting with Picasso's «Demoiselles d'Avignon.»
I think living in a country which has the one of largest populations constantly influences me to think about human form.
The evidence that global warming is occurring, and furthermore is due in large part to human influences (though perhaps other factors also play a role), is much stronger than the evidence I have personally seen that Inhofe exists.
Ocean is not too large that humans could not influence it.
In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences of the much larger effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the global energy balance.
Those of us who put our feet where our mouths are, and visa - versa, have been living simply for decades, and, in my case have realised that very few are following, in fact things are going in the other direction, so the question is, how do we minimise the damage whilst we lack the influence to significantly change the growth / consumption philosophy (which is natural, but in humans has too much power behind it for safety) of society at large.
The summer - winter changes in insolation are much larger than those due to human - induced greenhouse gas changes; the seasonal change is mainly in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum while the greenhouse gas forcing is in the infrared; the greenhouse gas influence is global while the seasonal changes are opposite in the two hemispheres; and we have a much longer history of observing the seasonal changes, so a more or less correct prediction can be made empirically, without any physical understanding.
It strikes me that we're trying to ascribe climate outcomes to immeasurable influences in really small drivers (like CO2 created from human activity) instead of immeasurable influences in really large drivers (like insolation).
Yes, human influence is large enough and pervasive enough to alter those fluctuations.
The Third Assessment Report (TAR, 2001) concluded that temperature increases over the twenty - first century could be significantly larger than previously thought, and that the evidence for human influence on climate change was stronger than ever.
But neglecting causation in the opposite direction (clouds cause temperature) can lead to large errors in our understanding of how and why the climate system changes, as well as in our diagnosis of how sensitive the climate system is to human influences.»
So profound has been the influence of humans, Nobelist Crutzen and his colleagues later wrote, that the Earth has entered a new geological epoch defined by a single, troubling fact: the «human imprint on the global environment has now become so large and active that it rivals some of the great forces of Nature in its impact on the functioning of the Earth system.»
The use of even more recently computer - reconstructed total solar irradiance data (whatever have large uncertainties) for the period prior to 1976 would not change any of the conclusions in my paper, where quantitative analyses were emphasized on the influences of humans and the Sun on global surface temperature after 1970 when direct measurements became available.
That seems like a rather arbitrary figure - it's larger than 10, but smaller than the 17 year timeframe which Santer et al. concluded is necessary to evaluate the human influence on global temperatures.
So profound has been the influence of humans that Earth scientists have recently declared that the Earth has entered a new geological epoch, a new epoch defined by the fact that the «human imprint on the global environment has now become so large and active that it rivals some of the great forces of Nature in its impact on the functioning of the Earth system».
«Due to the large amount of variability in UK rainfall, it's not yet possible to say whether human influence directly impacted this year's total.»
How human influence affected other types of events such as droughts, heavy rain events, and storms was less clear, indicating that natural variability likely played a much larger role in these extremes.
To have most of the additional carbon of the atmosphere from other sources than human influence these other sources must be larger than the human influence.
While there are alternative explanations for the ratios over shorter periods, I remain very doubtful on the possibility of fitting the history of the isotope ratios to any alternative theory that includes the large changes in natural fluxes that are required to make human influence less than dominant factor.
Large sinks, large sources, tiny human influeLarge sinks, large sources, tiny human influelarge sources, tiny human influence.)
By its placement in the film, it appears that I am saying that since carbon dioxide exists in the ocean in such large quantities, human influence must not be very important — diametrically opposite to the point I was making — which is that global warming is both real and threatening in many different ways, some unexpected.
The majority was concerned about human influences on climate, but were uncertain which would prove larger: CO2 warming or cooling from aerosols.
Further affirmation of the reality of the warming is its spatial distribution, which has largest values at locations remote from any local human influence, with a global pattern consistent with that expected for response to global climate forcings (larger in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere, larger at high latitudes than low latitudes, larger over land than over ocean).
As Judith says, one of the key conclusions is the paragraph in large red letters «Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations... Discernible human influences now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental - average temperatures, temperature extremes and wind patterns (see Figure SPM.4 and Table SPM.2).»
«An oft - repeated criticism of the theory of human influenced global warming researchers is that they use a small set of data to make predictions about a large phenomena,» wrote Cangrejero at The Midpoint.
Back to more recent times, natural factors like the PDO have a demonstrated huge influence on global temperatures, so large that any possible «human influence» greatly pales in comparison.
The scientific evidence for human influence on current climate comes from a large body of independent lines of evidence of which paleoclimate data is but a small part.