This would make it resemble a kind of class action suit, with the plaintiff suing
a large number of defendants, all with substantially identical facts being considered.
The Claimants obtained worldwide freezing orders against
a large number of defendants said to have been involved in the fraud and the disposal of the proceeds and successfully defended a jurisdictional challenge by certain defendants.
A second spike, immediately prior to the effective date of the AIA in late 2011, correlates with patent holders» last chance to sue
large numbers of defendants in a single case.
Not exact matches
Specifically,
Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many
of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower
numbers and increasing the likelihood
of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the
number of its non-performing loans in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because
of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk
of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's
largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market, including names, addresses, phone
numbers, loan information, accounts and, in some cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks
of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result
of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
In counts three and four, the
defendant alongside others now at
large, were accused
of conspiring to impersonate a public officer and unlawfully postured as the Lagos State Deputy Governor by calling and sending SMS on a mobile
number 09064583091 to the public as the said Deputy Governor contrary to and punishable under Sections 380 and 411
of the Criminal Law Cap C17, Vol 3, Laws
of Lagos State, 2015.
Since then, and particularly in recent years, there have been a
large number of initiatives designed to curb costs, such as limiting Legal Aid, and the removal
of the ability to claim so - called additional liabilities in «no win, no fee» agreements - from paying
defendants, costs budgeting and the use
of alternative dispute resolution.
Even a very incomplete list gives an impression
of the
large number of significant opinions he has written: seminal administrative law cases such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, the intellectual property case Sony Corp v. Universal City Studios (which made clear that making individual videotapes
of television programs did not constitute copyright infringement), important war on terror precedents such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, important criminal law cases such as Padilla v. Kentucky (holding that defense counsel must inform the
defendant if a guilty plea carries a risk
of deportation) and Atkins v. Virginia (which reversed precedent to hold it was unconstitutional to impose capital punishment on the mentally retarded), and
of course Apprendi v. New Jersey (which revolutionized criminal sentencing by holding that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maximums based on facts other than those decided by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).
A
large number of pleadings were exchanged before, the second
defendant issued an application in the TCC to transfer the case from the county court to the TCC under CPR 30.3 (2) and para 2.1
of CPR Pt 60 PD.
In the case
of large corporations doing business nationwide, this usually meant that a plaintiff had a
large number of states to choose from in which a
defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing
of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuit.
Mark counts among his many successes his role as co-counsel in a complex products liability action, which resulted in the
largest personal injury award in the State
of Delaware at the time
of its completion, $ 17.5 Million against a
number of national
defendants.
A class action is a form
of civil action where one or a few plaintiffs can sue a
defendant or a
number of defendants on behalf
of a
larger group
of people who claim the same type
of loss from the same
defendant of group
of defendants.