The other problem is a mathematical one, in terms of how you actually evaluate with observations a model with a very
large number of degrees of freedom that is nonlinear / chaotic as well.
What I'm trying to get at is that although the problem with records is clearly the arbitrarily
large number of degrees of freedom that they invoke.
Not exact matches
However improbable in a mechanistic sense the elaborate organic structure created by life may appear, it seems increasingly evident that the cosmic substance is drawn toward these states
of extreme arrangement by a particular kind
of attraction which compels it, by the play
of large numbers in which it is involved, to miss no opportunity
of becoming more complex and thus achieving a higher
degree of freedom.
But the attempt to reduce living systems to such, that is to say formal reductionism, fails in part because the
number of possible combinations or classifications is generally immensely
larger than the
number of degrees of freedom.
One important step in understanding a physical system consisting
of a
large number of entities — for example, the atoms making up a magnetic material — is to identify among the many
degrees of freedom of the system those that are most relevant for its physical behaviour.
Clearly, like Spence UK rightly said, the
number of the
degrees of freedom will be
large.
Owing to the decreased
number of spatial
degrees of freedom in the earliest reconstructions (associated with significantly decreased calibrated variance before e.g. 1730 for annual - mean and cold - season, and about 1750 for warm - season pattern reconstructions) regional inferences are most meaningful in the mid 18th century and later, while the
largest - scale averages are useful further back in time.