Sentences with phrase «large return on your money»

Because the income is guaranteed, you probably won't earn a large return on your money.

Not exact matches

In this way Google can use its large balance sheet to make these investments and make a decent return on the money over time.

«Leaving the question of price aside, the best business to own is one that over an extended period can employ large amounts of free — other peoples money — in highly productive assets so that return on owners capital becomes exceptional.»

Indeed, these deals were special for all involved: (a) Levy enjoyed Madoff's inflated return rates of up to 40 % on the money he invested with Madoff; (b) Madoff enjoyed the benefits of large amounts of cash to perpetuate his fraud without being subject to JPMC's due diligence processes; and (c) JPMC earned fees on the loan amounts and watched the «special deals» from afar, escaping responsibility for any due diligence on Madoff's operation.»

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

In return for being relieved of the debt, the government agrees to spend a larger amount of money on environmental protection schemes.

Sequels to comedies used to be pretty rare, but these days if you make even an okay amount of money studios are going to be much more willing to let you return for another go around rather than take the risk of making an original property on a large budget.

There's an insane amount of competition for consumers» attention, and only the luckiest, most heavily promoted, and best ebooks will sell in large quantities (by large quantities I mean in the hundreds or thousands; again a reason why publishers, in my view, should not be spending a lot of money creating and distributing ebooks if they expect a return on investment on most of their books).

Fidelity vs. Vanguard How international small - caps spice up a retirement portfolio Foreign big - cap value stocks outshine U.S. counterparts What global large - cap stocks do for your retirement portfolio Six reasons you should invest internationally How to double your target - date retirement fund's return in a single move Why REITs belong in your retirement portfolio When it pays to go all - in on small - cap value This 4 - fund combo wallops the S&P 500 index Buy the best performing stock sector for 87 years How to make money with small - cap stocks Looking for action?

We usually recommend that Couch Potato investors follow a classic balanced strategy, which consists of putting 60 % of your money in stocks and 40 % in bonds, but you may want to adjust the stock component upward if you're young and willing to take on additional risk in pursuit of larger returns.

Hello sir i m new in investment i want to invest in MF SIP basis but when i try to invest there are a lot of confusion to select funds.where to invest open / close ended, either in debt / equity / balanced, either in growth / divedent either in large cap / mid cap / large cap.little bit confusion on return % while surfing money control for ex.

The IRS is just returning your own money, and large refunds often mean you likely have been overpaying on your taxes all year.

Mezzanine securities, under our definition, are instruments which based on our purchase price show promise of giving the Fund an annual pre-tax cash return, or zero - coupon return of in excess of 20 %, and where there does not appear to be large risks of either a money default or of a contemplated transaction including liquidations, not closing.

When two people get married, if one person has a much larger income than the other, you might actually save a quite a bit of money on tax by filing a joint return.

On the other hand, keeping all your money in guaranteed investments such as a savings account is unrecommended for a long - term objective since inflation will likely wipe out your returns and the opportunity cost would simply be too large.

Also, the high costs involved may raise questions regarding the expected returns from such very expensive deals, and if the principle aim is to capture a large number of newcomers rather than showing existing clients that their broker is so well established and capitalized that it can spend money on such costly partnerships.

«Don't let those large colonies make the public not want [return - to - field],» Trebatoski advised in a 2015 Maddie's Institute webcast, adding that once return - to - field is implemented, «the number of nuisance calls also falls dramatically,» which saves the city money long - term and allows animal control officers to focus on larger issues.

Add on a tax return nearly ten times larger than expected + lots of money saved up already = WIN FOR ME BWAHAHAHA.

With many large solar projects planned in California, it would seem to be a logical move to slow down and find out what our money is being spent on and what the return on investment will be as opposed to rushing in head first, only to find another government mandated, costly boondoggle.

What these larger solar leasing and PPA companies have done is to get investors who want long term stable returns to put up money to fund installing solar panels on your home.

[13] Chief Justice James Allsop of the Federal Court of Australia summarised the ethical issues which arise as a result of the conflict the billable hours system creates between the economic pressure on a firm to maximise its profit and the ethical pressure on lawyers to work in their client's best interest: «Only a very slight change of focus needs to be made by a lawyer to change from (a) expecting a profitable return from running as well and efficiently as possible a large case in court, to (b) planning how to make as much money as possible from running the same large case in court.»

This investor gives you money to fund your burgeoning start - up in hopes that he or she will see a large financial return on their investment.

Dividend payments are typically large enough that whole life owners actually can expect to have a positive rate of return on their life insurance during the life of the owner, meaning after a certain amount of time the cash value of the policy will be larger than the amount of money paid in.

Savings with Protection Solutions - Money back insurance policies that create wealth through periodic incremental savings, and enable you to save money steadily in small amounts with the advantages of a large life cover and tax - free returns on the endowment insurance Money back insurance policies that create wealth through periodic incremental savings, and enable you to save money steadily in small amounts with the advantages of a large life cover and tax - free returns on the endowment insurance money steadily in small amounts with the advantages of a large life cover and tax - free returns on the endowment insurance plan.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

After spending large amounts of money on a degree (s) and advanced training, it only makes sense to use a resume that will effectively market that education and yield a strong return.

For example, Rimsza, with 26 years in the business, is dealing with today's tight lending environment by cultivating a network of «B money lenders,» individuals with cash on hand who are willing to fund loans with a large down payment (typically 20 percent to 25 percent down) and the promise of a healthy return.

The percentage discount rate depends on how great a rate of return the acquirer demands for giving up money today in exchange for potentially larger amounts in the future from the retiree's book of business.