The school, one of the first three charter schools to open in Indianapolis, has been earned praise for more than a decade for demonstrating
large test score gains with disadvantaged students.
Rigorous evaluations of existing Boston charters show
large test score gains.
These students perform better in third grade reading and math tests, have
larger test score gains over time, have fewer absences and disciplinary incidents, are less likely to repeat grades, and are more likely to graduate from high school in four years.
Not exact matches
The latest round of state standardized academic
test scores showed
gains both across New York State and locally.But rather than celebrate the
largest bump since New York adopted new
tests tied to the Common Core Learning Standards, education officials reported the increases with caution.
The
largest gains for the
test — the Kentucky Instructional Results System, or KIRIS — came in reading and mathematics, with fewer students
scoring at the «novice,» or lowest, level and more students
scoring at the «proficient» and «distinguished» levels.
The estimated
gain from being offered a voucher is only half as
large as the
gain from switching to private school (in response to being offered a voucher), so the estimated impact of offering vouchers is no more than one - eighth as
large as the black - white
test score gap.
New York vouchers (Chingos and Peterson, 2013)-- modest
test score gain,
larger college enrollment improvement
When comparable samples and measuring sticks are used, the improvement in
test scores for black students from attending a small class based on the Tennessee STAR experiment is about 50 percent
larger than the
gain from switching to a private school based on the voucher experiments in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Dayton, Ohio.
Despite making far
larger test -
score gains than students attending open - enrollment district schools, and despite the emphasis their schools place on cultivating non-cognitive skills, charter school students exhibit markedly lower average levels of self - control as measured by student self - reports (see Figure 2).
In our study, the teachers with
larger gains on low - cost state math
tests also had students with
larger gains on the Balanced Assessment in Mathematics, a more - expensive - to -
score test designed to measure students» conceptual understanding of mathematics.
But other states with
large spending increments — New York, Wyoming, and West Virginia, for example — had only marginal
test -
score gains to show for all that additional expenditure.
A study of
test scores from 2010 through 2014, by economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Duke University, found that Denver's charters produced «remarkably
large gains in math,»
large gains in writing, and smaller but statistically significant
gains in reading, compared to DPS - operated schools.
Among African Americans,
test -
score gains were also
larger in the states with genuine alternative certification.
This year, the state of California distributed $ 100 million to teachers in schools that started with
test scores in the bottom half of schools in 1999 and achieved
large gains in performance between 1999 and 2000.
It is possible that the disproportionately
large gains in
test -
score performance in the states with genuine alternative certification were due to some other factor, possibly other education reforms those states were introducing at the same time they were widening the door to the teaching profession.
These effects are all
larger than what would have been predicted based on the same students»
test -
score gains, leading the researchers to conclude that «high achieving charter schools alter more than cognitive ability.»
This argument begs the question about how
large correlations should be to be considered as indicators of adult outcomes, and it also discounts recent research showing that
test scores improvements related to effective teachers were correlated with
gains in adult labor - market outcomes.
Each of these results is statistically significant at a very high level, meaning that we can be highly confident that the
test -
score gains made by schools facing the actuality or prospect of voucher competition were
larger than the
gains made by other public schools.
As hypothesized, actual voucher competition produced the
largest improvements in
test scores, while the prospect of facing voucher competition produced somewhat smaller
gains.
These two indicators of cheating — unusually
large increases followed by small
gains or even declines in
test scores the next year and unexpected patterns in students» answers — form the basis of our method for detecting evidence of suspected cheating.
The second type of classroom, which we used as a control group, consisted of classrooms with
large test -
score gains but no evidence of cheating in their answer strings, a sign of plain - old good teaching.
Research by Marty West and colleagues of no excuses charter schools in Boston found
large gains in
test scores but also significantly lowered student performance on noncognitive measures.
Such low
scores indicate that the majority of students will have to make
large gains in achievement before they are able to pass the
test.
Conversely other types of charter and private schools in choice programs fail to improve
test scores but yield
large gains in later life outcomes.
We first subtracted from each student's
test score performance the child's demonstrated knowledge the previous year.We then adjusted those one - year -
gain scores to take into account a statistical property that artificially generates
larger gains for initially low - performing students (and smaller
gains for high performers).
In the meantime, the Bloomberg administration has some positive
test scores under its belt already, including an impressive 9.9 percentage point
gain for 4th graders on the state's most recent reading
tests, the
largest jump since the
test was initiated in 1999.
Even if the resulting
test -
score gains are
large, it is not clear that the schools are performing any better at the entire array of things we want them to do.
There are therefore several things to think about as we further explore the AEI study: long term outcomes do indeed matter a lot, especially for poor kids; if
large test -
score gains don't eventually translate into improved long term outcomes, it is a legitimate cause for concern; and we must stay open to the possibility that some programs could help kids immensely over the long haul, even if they don't immediately improve student achievement.
For example, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Jersey posted
large gains in student performance after boosting spending, but New York, Wyoming, and West Virginia had only marginal
test -
score gains to show from increased expenditures.
Had competition between private schools been maximising the quality of education each provided to its voucher students, we would not have observed such a
large gain in
test scores once schools knew their results would be made public.
We find that increases in private schooling produce considerably
large gains in student
test scores and living standards.
Naturally, schools with high
test scores show the smallest academic
gains, while schools with low
test scores show the
largest academic
gains.
«In some cases, these charter schools have quite
large effects, such that attending one for three years produce
test -
score gains that are equivalent to the size of the U.S. black - white achievement gap,» said Sarah Cohodes, an assistant professor of education and public policy at Columbia University in a publication from Princeton University and the Brookings Institute.
Those with fewer computers were seeing
larger educational
gains, as measured by PISA
test score changes between 2009 and 2012.
The Boston
test score gains for pre-K for middle - class sufficient are
large enough to easily pass a benefit - cost
test.
But the estimated future adult earnings
gains based on percentile
test score gains at kindergarten entrance are also
large.
Following
test scores from year to year in the same grade, the study finds that statewide improvements in standard Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) scores reported by the Connecticut State Department of Education (SDE) between 2008 and 2009 — the period of the largest reported gains — were largely the result of the exclusion of students with disabilities from these standard test results, rather than overall improvements in performa
test scores from year to year in the same grade, the study finds that statewide improvements in standard Connecticut Mastery
Test (CMT) scores reported by the Connecticut State Department of Education (SDE) between 2008 and 2009 — the period of the largest reported gains — were largely the result of the exclusion of students with disabilities from these standard test results, rather than overall improvements in performa
Test (CMT)
scores reported by the Connecticut State Department of Education (SDE) between 2008 and 2009 — the period of the
largest reported
gains — were largely the result of the exclusion of students with disabilities from these standard
test results, rather than overall improvements in performa
test results, rather than overall improvements in performance.
The results have been promising: A study of statewide implementation of the 5Essentials across Illinois — a state that encompasses districts of diverse size and composition — found that strength on the five essential supports is positively related to higher
test scores and
larger gains over time in math and reading, positive changes in attendance rates, and improved graduation rates.
But all of them share the idea that teachers who are particularly successful will help their students make
large learning
gains, that these
gains can be measured by students» performance on achievement
tests, and that the value - added
score isolates the teacher's contribution to these
gains.
On some
tests, low - achieving students can easily make comparatively
large score gains simply because the
test has a
large number of easy items.
Second, the
gains were
larger for kids of color than for white students, suggesting that this could make a slight dent in longstanding
test -
score gaps.
Students in the District's traditional public schools
scored higher than ever on the city's math and reading
tests this year, also posting the
largest single - year
gain since 2008, according to
test results released Tuesday.
Prior to 2013, when Common Core
testing was introduced, New York students had posted much
larger gains on the local state
tests than on national
tests, calling into question how valid
test score gains were during the Bloomberg administration.
A randomized study in Chicago also found
large gains in math
test scores from implementing mandated, intensive tutoring.