Not exact matches
Right before the First World War, another Harvard chemist, Lawrence Henderson, reworked
large parts
of Cooke's
argument (without crediting him for it) in a more secular form, in another
book with an illustrative title, The Fitness
of the Environment: An Inquiry Into the Biological Significance
of the Properties
of Matter.
But non-academics need not worry, because I plan on following it quickly with a much shorter work that will capture the gist
of my
argument, but without all the scholarly material that's packed into the
larger academic
book.
Nicco's
book is a series
of predictions and musings more than a single
argument, since he starts with the idea that digital tools tend, over time, to shift power away from
large institutions and toward small groups and individual actors and goes on to think about how it will affect institutions across the board.
In his new
book Reinventing the Sacred: A New View
of Science, Reason, and Religion (Basic
Books, New York; May 2008), Kauffman develops a
larger argument: Understanding what's happening in complex systems could help modern science break free
of what some consider its too - reductionistic underpinnings.
It's pretty much all there, the trappings
of a moral panic
argument: emphasis on the vulnerable among us (whether young or ignorant or simply «innocent»), the allegation
of insidious corruption working in ways that are out
of the sight
of the ordinary person, the confident assertions
of the experts, the reification
of the danger in print («I hold in my hand a
book...», «I have here in my hand a list
of 205 — a list
of names... «-RRB- and the use
of very
large (and rising) numbers that need only be tangentially related to the actual scourge...