Sentences with phrase «larger problem of global warming»

No one knows whether the United States can apply the system as successfully to the much larger problem of global warming emissions, or at what cost to the economy.

Not exact matches

In a world suffering from briskly advancing population growth, skyrocketing atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and consequential Global Warming, the formation of Terra Preta anew (Terra Preta Nova) could provide the largest signifiicant double whammy to these problems.

But my larger point is this: Scientists understand key aspects of the problem much better than someone who brands the whole thing (global warming) as «uncertain» probably thinks or wants to believe.

Global warming is everyone's problem — but with China on course to overtake the United States by 2009 as the largest emitter of carbon dioxide, the report adds to the crucial call for the Middle Kingdom to put all hands on deck.

Today, I'll illustrate how Keating's subsequent diatribe against me is little more than a microcosm of the larger problem plaguing the political side of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) issue.

After 25 years of close to a trillion dollars of treasure being expended, thousands of avoidable deaths from hypothermia related health problems amongst the elderly, the destruction of entire industries and large parts of some national economies, science, very expensive science at that has been sent down an innumerable number of dead end paths and rabbit holes in pursuit of the unpredictable non existent global warming and it's totally failed predictions of catastrophes always still to come but which never do.

Dr. Pachauri pointed out that it was yet another consequence of Anthropogenic Global Warming and that if he donated large sums of money to him and The Goracle his problem might go away.

Yet the emergence of global warming as an issue in the 1980s with its potential for large - scale social change needed to ameliorate its threat was seen as more threatening to conservatives in regard to industry, prosperity, life - style, and the entire American - way of life, than were traditional pollution problems.

One more bit on the Ross Gelbspan / James McCarthy situation, to drive home a larger point concerning the problem of critical information missing from mainstream media news discussions of the global warming issue.

It was for this reason that we argued that environmentalism had become a special interest, incapable of addressing large, complex, and global problems such as global warming.

packed with common problems awaiting for solutions - global warming, urban air pollution, contaminants in drinking water / contains samples of distributions of variables, it is actually a very large Bayesian belief network, which can be used for assessment - level analyses and conditioning and optimising different decision / and discussions about the actual topics related to real - world decision - making, there is also a meta level in Opasnet.

The underlying problem in all of this is that a large number of scientists have an incredibly strong vested interest in the «existence» of anthropogenic global warming.

If this shits you... well, petal, just get over yourself: global warming is a profoundly serious problem, and if the likes of you get your way and we don't address it post haste the planet will within decades be committed to a future where down the track it is screwed for human society and for a large chunk of life on Earth.

How embarrassing, and at the very least, indicative of a larger problem with mainstream media news reporting on the global warming issue.

First, in regard to Ross Gelbspan, it appears Blakemore has a backpedal situation that most people would agree a reporter should never be caught doing, then there is a problem with a particular line in Blakemore's ABC News bio, and finally there is the larger problem of how the global warming issue seems to owe its life to the sheer lack of rigorous journalism about it.

A large and determined fraction of the public were convinced that global warming worries deserved only scorn, and most of the rest gave the problem a far lower priority than the economic and political issues of the moment.

I am aware of people making the argument that the big push by the nuclear industry for enormous government subsidies to find a massive expansion of nuclear power on the basis that nuclear power is «THE ANSWER» to global warming is a fraud that dishonestly and cynically takes advantage of growing concern about the very real problem of global warming, and I make that argument myself (because even a quite large expansion of nuclear electricity generation would have little effect on overall GHG emissions, at great cost, taking too long to achieve even that little effect, while misdirecting resources that could more effectively be applied elsewhere).

The problem is that the costs of abating CO2 to any levels that might make a difference are both enormous and certain (vs. global warming costs which may or may not be large and are uncertain).