And with
larger readership numbers comes an even greater need to ascertain more control, especially concerning an often previously ignored component in the writing journey - rights and licensing.
Not exact matches
REUTERS — Oct 5 — The average
number of monthly visitors to U.S. newspaper websites rose by nearly a third in the first half of 2006 (to 55.5 million: Nielsen / / Netratings), though print
readership at some
larger U.S. newspapers fell.
You may not make a ton of money but Amazon knows that there's a
large number of authors who'd be willing to receive less pay in exchange for broader
readership.
For a beginning author, one strategy might be to live with the small royalties and built - in
readership, use social media to build name recognition, then go independent and parlay the name recognition into more money and, perhaps even more name recognition, then go mainstream again to combine better royalty rates and
larger numbers.
Their publishers stubbornly priced their print books at points that wouldn't sell, at least not in
large enough
numbers to build a
readership.
Pew studies show the highest print
readership rates are among those ages 18 to 29, and the same age group is still using public libraries in
large numbers.
Although the
larger audiences meant its publications no longer enjoyed quite the same intimacy with their
readerships, its words were still reaching a
larger number of people, spreading the good word of games further.
Just a minor request... could some of the overwhelming
number of acronyms be fleshed out occasionally for those of us who don't necessarily know what they stand for... NIMBY, MBTU, HCFC etc etc... although familiar to many who post, I would like to remind all that we are trying to educate a
larger readership, and ultimately influence public policy.
Grim # 46 does get the main point I was trying to make in the passage cited, which I should remind people was written (a) for publication in a newspaper whose
readership includes a
large number of people who we've yet to convince and (b) was written in an attempt to engage with someone who was seeking to argue in terms of probabilities and was suggesting that a 30 % likelihood that AGW is happening or will happen is not really something to worry about.