Consequently, the goal should be for winners to be
larger than losers.
Not exact matches
Lately, we've been closing our swing trades with about a 50 % win rate (maybe even slightly lower), but our average gain has been MUCH
larger than the average
loser.
Although (by some measures) this is not quite as bad for Labour as the boundary changes in 2010, it is significantly worse
than had been predicted by «independent» experts, who had predicted the Labour would be the
largest loser but have a net gain compared with all other parties combined.
In short, the only clients that agents (who, contrary to popular belief, do not, by - in -
large work for authors, but are little more
than slush filters that publishers generously allow authors the luxury of paying for) can look forward to having, and being eager for publishers to exploit in the traditional way... are
losers.
Why would subscriptions for ebooks require that there be a
large percentage of flabby
losers and why is that different
than (and less successful
than) for subscriptions to music or movies?
You need to have patience to sit on your hands when your trading edge is not present, and you need to have patience to see your trading edge play out over a
large series of trades, rather
than getting emotional after hitting a few
losers.
It is reasonably likely that SO2 climate engineering would have unacceptable costs because many more people would be precipitation
losers than winners, since a very
large fraction of people are farmers in India and China who rely on rain.
Exelon,
largest utility in the Fortune 500, has made clear its preference for outcomes based on free markets, «rather
than through the government picking technology winners and
losers,» and proudly declared itself «anti-subsidy.»
Let's start with the assumption that those US states which get significantly more
than 50 % of their electricity from coal, and / or states which export, or plan to export,
large amounts of coal - fired electricity to neighboring states, are at highest risk of becoming economic «
losers.»