Not exact matches
I could fill a
large hotel full of the most World's most «learnerd» Jewish, Christian and Islamic theological scholars (to take the, inaptly named, monothistic
religions) and they would be unable to agree on anything
other than some nauseating throw away line like «we should all rewspect each
other's views»».
The Universe, known and unknown, is possibly not the most used definition of God, at least in the western world... but it is the Pantheistic version that jives so much more with science and is not a misappropriation of the smaller definitions of God, merely an unfamiliar definition to those with less knowledge of various more advanced religious and philosophic thought, within and outside those
religions... The idea of Pantheism also thoughtfully considers why there is, rather
than ridiculing, such a wide range of philosophical and ritual beliefs from a scientific perspective... without having to classify
large groups of people, as senseless idiots from one end or destined for hell from the
other.
This big blue ball would be a lot better place if people were more respectful of each
others» differing perspectives, rather
than having the
larger part of 8 billion people all claiming to have the one true
religion.
Priests may... appear more likely to molest children because cases of abuse come to light in huge waves... Allen suggests a final reason we hear so much more about Catholic abuse
than transgressions in
other religions: [the Church's] sheer size... «When you consider the per capita data,» says Allen, «I don't think they have a
larger incidence
than other faiths.»
However,
other people who have campaigned for you may have done so because they realize that for «our family», which is much
larger than America, dismemberments and forced artificial separations (be it in nationality, citizenship,
religion, gender, race, sexuality, identity or ideology) have caused enough damage and trauma already.