Not exact matches
«Particles of any kind, even much smaller
than the wavelength of
visible light, will, as a rule, make the sky brighter but at the expense of its purity of color,» Bohren says, noting that the effect is more pronounced when there is a high concentration of
large aerosols.
Aerosols that are close in size or
larger than the wavelengths of
visible light tend to scatter all colors indiscriminately, increasing the overall brightness of the sky but dampening color contrast.
The
large velocities of the galaxies in the clusters are produced by more gravity force
than can be explained with the gravity of the
visible (either shining or blocking
light) matter in the galaxies.
For the same reason, infrared astronomy enables researchers to observe cosmic objects through
large clouds of interstellar dust that scatter infrared radiation substantially less
than visible light.
With its 30 m prime mirror diameter, TMT will be three times as wide, with nine times more area,
than the
largest currently existing
visible -
light telescope in the world.
Mainly because infrared is been classified as
larger spectrum does it have more total watts per square meter of sunlight, but it has lower intensity per nanometer of spectrum
than visible light has.
Also you focused on re-radiating meaning emitting long - wave spectrum - which possible, but I was thinking more about emitting the same wavelength, as mentioned in this quote: «However, aerosols (which often contain water and if so can absorb red wavelengths) are usually
larger than visible wavelengths and therefore absorb and reflect all wavelengths of
light equally (this is not technically scattering, although it is often called that; it technically involves absorption and re-radiation, or reflection).»