That article included a chart that said, «If food wastage were a country, it would be the third
largest emitting country in the world.»
It is time that this persistent and worsening climate inequity is resolved, and for
the largest emitting countries to act on their commitment of common but differentiated responsibilities.
This argument was often made without e critical comment in the United States even though the United States had committed itself to take the first steps to reduce emissions along wAlthough President Obama originally negotiated the Copenhagen Accord with just four other countries, in the last few hours of the Copenhagen conference the United States successfully convinced most
large emitting countries to support the Accord.
China already committed in a declaration last month with 15 other
large emitting countries at the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate in Italy to peak global and national emissions «as soon as possible.»
Not exact matches
But the US is also responsible for approximately one - third of the carbon dioxide that has been
emitted, which makes the fact that the
country is pledging a
larger sum of money a bit more logical.
In 2005, residents of Portland, Oregon — where regulations encourage infill development —
emitted 35 percent less carbon dioxide than the average resident of the
country's 100
largest metropolitan areas.
These reservoirs are more than enough for the 3.2 billion metric tons of CO2
emitted every year by the roughly 4,600
large industrial sources in the
country.
Australia relies heavily on coal for its own electricity as well,
emitting more CO2 per person than any other developed
country, and its agricultural emissions are among the highest per capita in the world, mainly because of the
large numbers of sheep and cattle.
«If one of the
largest carbon dioxide
emitting countries gets out of the Paris Agreement, the efforts of the others will be clearly reduced,» says author Gabriel Reygondeau, Nippon Foundation - Nereus Program senior fellow at UBC.
Result - oriented concrete actions taken by the two
largest greenhouse gas
emitting nations will also set an example for other
countries encouraging unilateral action and leading to sustainable transportation initiatives, as well as cooperative initiatives with other
countries through multilateral fora.
As John Broder reports, 10 Senate Democrats sent a letter to President Obama on Thursday saying they would not support a bill without the confidence that all
countries emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases were acting to limit their impact on the shared atmosphere.
Globally, India is the third
largest carbon -
emitting country — though its per capita emissions are only one third of the international average — according to the World Resources Institute.
Greenhouse gas emissions are spread highly unevenly across the world's
countries (Fig. 1), with the top ten GHG
emitting countries generating > 60 % of total emissions, and three
countries, China (21.1 %), the United States of America (14.1 %) and India (5.2 %) being by far the
largest contributors.
• Approaches that account for the global dimensions of achieving and maintaining sustainable levels of atmospheric CO2 and encourage cooperative action by all
countries, including the U.S. and
large emitting nations in the developing world, to implement CO2 emission reduction strategies.
Such a benchmark would allow them to make a push at the Paris talks for «loss and damages» — compensation for poorer
countries impacted by global warming from the
larger greenhouse - gas
emitting nations.
But the US is not the only
country with a shameful track record, most developed
countries have
emitted outrageously
larger amounts of climate change causing gases to the atmosphere than most of the rest of the world.
The reasons for this are that the remaining carbon budget is so small, the per capita and historical emissions of high -
emitting developed nations are so
large compared to poor developing
countries, and the financial resources of developed
countries are so
large compared to poor developing
countries that equity considerations demand that the high -
emitting nations financially help developing nations achieve their targets.
In 2015 the economy was 15 percent
larger than in 2005, but the
country emitted 23 percent less carbon dioxide per dollar of GDP last year compared with 10 years prior.
But a
country with low carbon intensity and
large economy could still
emit more overall than a
country with a high carbon intensity and small economy.
Double - digit decreases also occurred in a number of other
large carbon -
emitting countries, including South Korea -LRB--20 points), Japan (13) and Russia -LRB--10).
As we shall see, these
countries, among others, have continued to negotiate as if: (a) they only need to commit to reduce their greenhouse gas emission if other nations commit to do so, in other words that their national interests limit their international obligations, (b) any emissions reductions commitments can be determined and calculated without regard to what is each nation's fair share of safe global emissions, (c)
large emitting nations have no duty to compensate people or nations that are vulnerable to climate change for climate change damages or reasonable adaptation responses, and (d) they often justify their own failure to actually reduce emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions on the inability to of the international community to reach an adequate solution under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
This year's show focuses one hour on each of the world's 24
largest CO2 -
emitting countries, featuring performances, educational segments, appearances by experts and activists, and live commentary by former US Vice President Al Gore and others — all focused on how each
country can do its part to make the goals of the Paris Agreement a reality.
When the differences between the two estimates were summed, without regard to sign, the difference for the top 5
emitting countries was
larger than the sum of the differences for the remaining 190
countries.
India's
large and relatively poor population meant the
country only
emitted 1.7 tonnes per person in 2013.