Not exact matches
Investors hoping to a buy a piece of the world's
largest oil company may be forced to wait until 2019 at the earliest, amid
reports Saudi Aramco's initial public offering (IPO) is likely to be delayed.
Investors hoping to a buy a piece of the world's
largest oil company may be forced to wait until 2019 at the earliest, amid
reports Saudi Aramco's IPO is likely to be delayed.
In a separate
report focusing on
larger integrated
oil companies, Moody's came to a similar conclusion — that the substantial improvement in the financial position of the
oil industry over the past year is poised to slow down.
Recent
reports that China's
large state - owned
oil companies are considering an outright purchase of 5 percent of Saudi Aramco, a move that Saudi Arabia is rumored to be considering in lieu of the Aramco IPO, should be seen in this context.
«Over recent months, several of the world's
largest oil companies have acquired a variety of
companies and projects that have nothing to do with extracting, refining, or distributing hydrocarbons — but that are set to thrive in the low - carbon transition,» the
report states.
Over recent months, several of the world's
largest oil companies have acquired a variety of
companies and projects that have nothing to do with extracting, refining, or distributing hydrocarbons — but that are set to thrive in the low - carbon transition,» the
report
Meanwhile, Exxon Mobil (XOM - Free Exxon Mobil Stock
Report), the world's
largest publicly traded
oil company, turned in the Dog's second best performance.
Focusing on the United Kingdom, we believe current conditions favor
large UK multinational
companies that obtain much of their earnings abroad or
report their results in foreign currencies (e.g., global integrated
oil and gas
companies).
A recent
report by the Center for American Progress found that over the past decade, five of the world's top 10
oil companies — ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell Group, and ConocoPhillips Co. — and other
large traditional energy
companies with a direct commercial stake in future energy markets have forged dozens of multi-year, multi-million-dollar alliances with top U.S. universities and scientists to carry out energy - related research.
The comment taken from the leftist rag the Guardian, «Scientists and economists have been offered $ 10,000 each by a lobby group funded by one of the world's
largest oil companies to undermine a major climate change
report due to be published today»...
Earlier this year, the Union of Concerned Scientists released a
report evaluating the palm
oil buying practices of 40 of America's
largest companies.
Creditors that
report to the credit bureau are most often banks, savings and loans, mortgage
companies,
large department stores, finance
companies, VISA and Mastercard banks,
oil companies and
companies that are members of the credit bureau.
Retail and
oil and gas
companies performed particularly strongly, with 67 percent and 65 percent of the
largest companies in each sector
reporting on climate risks.
The
report estimated that between 2013 and 2015, banks put up $ 42 billion for
companies active in coal mining, $ 154 billion for the 20
largest coal - fired power producers and $ 306 billion for
companies that drill «extreme
oil» (such as resources that lie deep under water).
Scientists and economists have been offered $ 10,000 each by a lobby group funded by one of the world's
largest oil companies to undermine a major climate change
report due to be published today.