Patent Attorney Mark Houghton, talks about his specialist Patent practice, Patent Outsourcing Limited, which provides European Patent prosecution services, mainly to US clients, and he also talks about specific current European patent issues of interest, particularly the European Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with larger portf
Patent Attorney Mark Houghton, talks about his specialist
Patent practice, Patent Outsourcing Limited, which provides European Patent prosecution services, mainly to US clients, and he also talks about specific current European patent issues of interest, particularly the European Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with larger portf
Patent practice,
Patent Outsourcing Limited, which provides European Patent prosecution services, mainly to US clients, and he also talks about specific current European patent issues of interest, particularly the European Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with larger portf
Patent Outsourcing Limited, which provides European
Patent prosecution services, mainly to US clients, and he also talks about specific current European patent issues of interest, particularly the European Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with larger portf
Patent prosecution services, mainly to US clients, and he also talks about specific current European
patent issues of interest, particularly the European Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with larger portf
patent issues of interest, particularly the European
Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with larger portf
Patent Office's «Early Certainty» initiative and its impact on clients with
larger portfolios.
Whether the decision will significantly affect
patent prosecution practice remains to be seen, as applicants still have other incentives to disclose
large volumes of art — and may have an even greater incentive to do so if the Supreme Court holds in Microsoft v. i4i that defendants» evidentiary burden of proving invalidity depends on what was disclosed and argued to the PTO.
Gary manages a very
large prosecution practice before the UK and European
patent offices, and has handled numerous oppositions and appeals before the European Patent Office (EPO), both as opponent and defe
patent offices, and has handled numerous oppositions and appeals before the European
Patent Office (EPO), both as opponent and defe
Patent Office (EPO), both as opponent and defendant.