Not exact matches
A
large factor in work is momentum - if you just put in the time to get yourself
warmed up, you'll soon find things flowing.
It remains too soon to tell exactly how this climate system will work under changed conditions and other environmental
factors — such as whether the cooling effect of the soot generated by industry and burning forests outweighs the
warming effect of greenhouse gases — which may play
large roles.
«It is true that there are other
factors (such as volcanism, the changes in the orbit and the axis of the Earth, the solar cycle), but numerous scientific studies indicate that most of the global
warming in recent decades is due to the
large concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxide and others) mainly emitted due to human activity.»
Each region had an above - average CEI for the season with
warm maximum and minimum temperatures being the
largest contributing
factor.
After correcting for problems caused by the decaying orbit of satellites, as well as other
factors, they have produced a new record showing 36 % faster
warming since 1979 and nearly 140 % faster (i.e. 2.4 times
larger)
warming since 1998.
And while that high ranking was fueled in part by a major heat wave out West, a big
factor was the very
warm nighttime temperatures across a
large swath of the country.
The first is to emphasize your point that degassing of CO2 from the oceans is not simply a matter of
warmer water reducing CO2 solubility, and that important additional
factors include changes in wind patterns, reduction in sea ice cover to reveal a
larger surface for gas escape, and upwelling of CO2 from depths consequent to the changing climate patterns.
The evidence that global
warming is occurring, and furthermore is due in
large part to human influences (though perhaps other
factors also play a role), is much stronger than the evidence I have personally seen that Inhofe exists.
I am very well aware and have previously blogged that there are multiple
factors that determine the degree of ice lost any given year — but the literature is clear that even in 2007, global
warming played «a
large part» (see «What drove the dramatic retreat of arctic sea ice during summer 2007?
To some extent, this is again due to the
factors mentioned above, but additionally, the models predict that the North Atlantic as a whole will not
warm as fast as the rest of globe (due to both the deep mixed layers in this region which have a
large thermal inertia and a mild slowdown in the ocean heat transports).
The most interesting thing for me was in (IIRC) the * Bengtsson *, where they proposed that the main physical
factor in the «variability - driven
warming / SI decline» of the»30s was a persistent circulation pattern resulting in a «clearing» of the Barents (or Barentsz, if you prefer), which in turn fed back into a
larger warming.
«CO2 and the Sun played the
largest roles in the early century
warming, but other
factors played a part as well.
It is conceivable that aerosol effects (which includes «smoke») could also affect the lapse rate, but the aerosols tend to
warm where they are located and depending on the composition, cool below — this gives an impact that — if it was a
large factor in the tropical mean — would produce changes even
larger than predicted from the moist adiabatic theory.
If C02 is the
largest single contributing
factor to the Greenhouse Effect (because supposedly water vapor is only involved as a feedback to primary chemistry involving C02 itself), and C02 lags temperature increases (as has been stated on this very blog), how has the Earth ever returned to colder glacial conditions following periods of
warming?
I haven't thought much about the THC although I've expressed doubt about seeing
large regional cooling if it did shut down or change direction, mainly because global
warming is so rapid that any cooling effect with time would be dampened by
warming factors going on.
That is the
largest human induced cooling
factor, some 1 W / m2 against the 2.4 W / m2
warming by GHGs since the start of the industrial revolution.
It is true that there are other
factors (such as volcanism, the changes in the orbit and the axis of the Earth, the solar cycle), but numerous scientific studies indicate that most of the global
warming in recent decades it is due to the
large concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxide and others) mainly emitted due to human activity.
Therefore, incorporating
large - scale dynamical
factors, for example, from GCMs will help further constrain the MBL and low - cloud responses to
warming.
Thank you for agreeing that there are other
factors at work in global
warming and bearing in mind the strength of those as demonstrated by climate history then any claim that man - made
factors are anywhere near as
large as 100 % or greater are going to have to demonstrate the current and past natural changes and how they interact.
Plankton is
largest CO2 absorber, but also oceans are near or
largest (by far
largest in the more distant past) CO2 emitters, so if CO2 happen to be an important
factor than: High UV / radiation = reduction in plankton = less CO2 absorbed =
warming, reverse holds true.
The water vapor acts as, and therefore is, by far the
largest factor of
warming theory.
So Nature published Pounds» more adamant connection to CO2 in «Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global
warming».17 Embodying the forceful storyteller Pounds boldly stated, «we conclude with «very high confidence» (> 99 %, following the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC) that
large - scale
warming is a key
factor in the disappearances.
Attribution is difficult, there are many
factors other than AGW in play, ENSO and other
large scale oscillations, however some studies do find that greenhouse
warming was at least partially behind the drought.
Amplification for the land area from 30 to 60 is underestimated, indicating some other
factor and from 60 to 90 north, a
large portion of the
warming is winter related indicating increase radiant loss to space.
You can not predict the effect of a
warmer climate on the rate of sea - level rise if you ignore what is by far the
largest factor affecting it: snowfall.
On
large spatial scales, heat stress is the most common
factor causing bleaching, which is predicted to increase in frequency and severity as the climate
warms.
With the late - summer ice edge located farther north than it used to be, storms produce
larger waves and more coastal erosion.5 An additional contributing
factor is that coastal bluffs that were «cemented» by ice - rich permafrost are beginning to thaw in response to
warmer air and ocean waters, and are therefore more vulnerable to erosion.22 Standard defensive adaptation strategies to protect coastal communities from erosion, such as use of rock walls, sandbags, and riprap, have been largely unsuccessful.23 Several coastal communities are seeking to relocate to escape erosion that threatens infrastructure and services but, because of high costs and policy constraints on use of federal funds for community relocation, only one Alaskan village has begun to relocate (see also Ch.
The influx could slow down or shut off the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) formation, the driving
factor behind the conveyor belt current known as thermohaline circulation, which brings
large amounts of
warm water to the North Atlantic region.
There is new information that lack of sea ice causes storms to produce
larger waves and more coastal erosion.5 An additional contributing
factor is that coastal bluffs that were «cemented» by permafrost are beginning to thaw in response to
warmer air and ocean waters, and are therefore more vulnerable to erosion.22 Standard defensive adaptation strategies to protect coastal communities from erosion such as use of rock walls, sandbags, and riprap have been largely unsuccessful.23 There remains considerable uncertainty, however, about the spatial patterns of future coastal erosion.
It is also known that geothermal energy particularly
warms the pacific waters around its rim (the ring of fire)-- perhaps not a
large factor but, it, too, would be gathered and moved to the equatorial zone by the currents.
92) If one
factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and
large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite - based temperature measurements show little, if any, global
warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).
Very
warm nights, likely due to predominant cloudiness, were a
large factor contributing to the record warmth.
Based on an extensive literature review, we suggest that (1) climate
warming occurs with great uncertainty in the magnitude of the temperature increase; (2) both human activities and natural forces contribute to climate change, but their relative contributions are difficult to quantify; and (3) the dominant role of the increase in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases (including CO2) in the global
warming claimed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is questioned by the scientific communities because of
large uncertainties in the mechanisms of natural
factors and anthropogenic activities and in the sources of the increased atmospheric CO2 concentration.
A forcing of 12 — 16 W m − 2, which would require CO2 to increase by a
factor of 8 — 16 times, if the forcing were due only to CO2 change, would raise the global mean temperature by 16 — 24 °C with much
larger polar
warming.
The basic results of this climate model analysis are that: (1) it is increase in atmospheric CO2 (and the other minor non-condensing greenhouse gases) that control the greenhouse
warming of the climate system; (2) water vapor and clouds are feedback effects that magnify the strength of the greenhouse effect due to the non-condensing greenhouse gases by about a
factor of three; (3) the
large heat capacity of the ocean and the rate of heat transport into the ocean sets the time scale for the climate system to approach energy balance equilibrium.
As for the part about a
large amount of water vapor being available, this too is part and parcel with global
warming — and is in fact an often overlooked
factor in the type of extreme weather and changes that become more likely as the planet as a whole
warms.
All of those
factors, along with a
warm spring, contributed to the hive's
large size.»
The hypothesized causal
factors include global
warming, atmospheric brown clouds, land surface modification, recovery from the mini ice - age, and
large scale drying of the air among other
factors.
Another
factor making it difficult for the public to recognize global
warming in winter, in addition to the
large natural variability in winter (Fig. 2), is a tendency of the public to equate heavy snowfall with harsh winter conditions, even if temperatures are not extremely low.
I think that if we
factor in thermal inertia (based on all figures we've been discussing and particularly on the IPCC links I provided), we still don't get enough
warming to support a
large sensitivity.
Both these studies note that various
factors have contributed to climate change since the 1960s but that most of the recent
large - scale
warming was very likely due to the observed increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.
Glenn is correct that in the absence of other
factors solar
warming would cause an increase in DTR, however the other influences are sufficiently
large that we would have to eliminate them to draw a strong conclusion from this effect alone.