Sentences with phrase «last point if»

Oh, one last point if the nut does come unstuck make sure you don't hit two others with the end of the bar!!

Ford would agree with this last point if only there were no elimination during concrescence.

Not exact matches

A recent Inc.com post pointed out that, if two lanes are merging into one, it makes more mathematical sense to «zipper merge» which means letting lanes fill up and then merging at the last possible moment.

If you want customers to use your online store again and again, then you need to ensure they don't abandon their shopping cart at the last point due to frustrating payment problems which can be easily avoided.

Attribution models have evolved from so - called «last touch attribution» to the point where you can tell if a particular ad campaign or content marketing approach is resonating.

This last point might be different if you looked at Trump in relation to his own company, which is basically an extension of his personal brand.

If you reach the point where you care about the last few percent, you'll be amazed at the power of the 1/99 rule.

Given the tendency of bigger cities to be pro-EU, these could be the last hopes of the Remain camp if it's trailing at this point.

If Syrian air defense units were ineffective in stopping U.S. cruise missiles, and most information now points to that outcome (actually, it looks like the Syrians fired their missiles after the last missile had hit), this represents a significant blow to the Assad regime and to Russia's ability to assist in an effective air defense in the region.

And, somewhat clumsily, I ask Repin a question that's been on my mind since attending last year's Open Innovations: If Moscow's tech corridor has already failed to take root on its own, what is the point of all this?

If you've got a newer point - of - sale (POS) terminal, you should be able to run a report which shows your busiest days and times during your last peak season.

It's been pointed out elsewhere that if Ryan's proposals were enacted, Mitt Romney would have had an effective tax rate of less than 1 % last year.

But as Neil Dutta, Chief Economist with Renaissance Macro Research points out, if you look at the actual flow data showing the number of people each month entering and exiting the labor force, the rate at which workers are entering the labor force is actually lower today than at any point over the last two years.

Piggybacking on that last point, you will definitely need help establishing credit if you are under the age of 18, as federal law prohibits minors from having their own credit card accounts.

The chief exec then drove his point home, telling Strober, «If you feel, respectfully, that you can get a higher return than the 38 % you got last year... you can sell your shares in Starbucks.»

This is an extension of the last point — if you are active on a few social networks and you Google your business name, the results are going to all be for your business, because of all of these social profiles.

But, he pointed it, it could have been worse — say, if Cohn had left during the tax reform push last year.

If you travel often and you take long trips abroad (and you have to purchase a pricey plane ticket at the last minute from time to time), you may want to apply for a card that lets you earn miles or travel points.

«The key point is that if the private sector is deleveraging, the last thing you want is for the government to cut its budget deficit,» he says.

«That means if you had the card in the last 24 months, then cancelled it, you probably won't get that big point boost again.»

The Blockchain and Cryptocurrency industry has gained rapid exposure within the last few years, and with the crypto - community growing at a expeditious rate, the vast majority of blockchain enthusiasts have at some point questioned, if there is a way to earn cryptocurrency, without buying it.

Peter Schiff points to the gigantic pile of debt that has been created over the last decade as a possible problem, especially if it is ever spent into the real economy.

Since the September low point last year US 10 - Year bond yields have risen 90bps, this compares to 125bps from the low point in July 2016 through to March 2017, or if you count it as one big move they've gone up 158bps.

When the current bubble collapses (and it will), this last point might become more relevant, particularly if n00b bagholders grab their pitchforks and start asking Uncle Sam to get involved, to help them get their money back.

But you're exposed to unlimited losses if markets crash — like they did when the Dow fell 2,400 points in a week last month.

Not sure if you noticed but the stock market dropped by more than 1,000 points twice last week — two of the market's single day point drops ever — and a lot of people are freaking out.

Up until 60 days ago, if you just randomly told me in the last nine years that the DOW was down 300 points, I would've said (16:40 — 16:42 inaudible).

This last statement is true, but the first misses the point that one advantage to SaaS for end - customers is if they downsize, they can downsize the bill.

I make the argument more fully in my recently released book «The Customer Relationship; Your Last Competitive Advantage» available from Vision Critical, but if you want the abridged version the three key points are:

I reccommend some youtube videos of Dr Bilal Philips (an Islamic Scholar and well versed brother in explaining many different topics and points) and InshAllah (if God wills) i hope you take your shahada (bearwitnessing that there is only No God but Allah and that Muhammad (pbuh) is the last and final Messenger of Allah.)

At this point it is left up to the individual and either partake (if they follow the religion) or, as is my case, be respectful and mature and ignore it for the 20 seconds it lasts.

After all, if one stands in line for hours to purchase a ticket for a broadway show, and then someone shows up at the last minute, cuts in line and gets a ticket ahead of you — what's the point of following the rules and standing in line.

If I was laying there waiting to die and I summoned my chaplain, and I wasn't allowed to talk about the things I most wanted to get off my chest before dying, the things I needed to make sure were said before the last drop of life in me was gone, what is the point of calling anyone in to talk to?

If you had to read that last sentence over again because it sounded like I was saying the same thing twice, you just proved my point.

And the consequence of these answers is real, too: «If we cannotanswer a confident «Yes» to the last three of these questions, the point of keeping our schools is lost and the project of education in our diocese has failed».

I have an errand to run — but if you insist, I will copy and paste some of your statements from the last couple weeks, and you can explain how it was really said from a «loving» Christian point of view.

Certainly, Pope Leo XIII's great encyclical, Rerum novarum, was pretty clear, at one point arguing that the government should come to the aid of families only as a last resort: «True, if a family finds itself in exceeding distress, utterly deprived of the counsel of friends, and without any prospect of extricating itself, it is right that extreme necessity be met by public aid...».

«If there is one thing I've learned about loving people in the last five years, it's that nobody wants to be featured as a prayer point in your newsletter.

But that underscores my main point: that the contemporary use of the prudential criteria of last resort, proportionality, and reasonable hope of success treats them as if they were the main themes in the just war idea.

To your last point, when I said choice is an illusion, I wasn't referring that it is impossible to make that choice, but rather that there is a «right» choice and a «wrong» choice, the «right» one being that you worship god, regardless of how weird some of the rituals might be, making you a little more than a robot, acting out a script your given, we're just slightly better because we can justify why we're acting out a command, but it takes years to understand that justification, in the beginning, you do these rituals because you're given a script and if you don't want to do it, tough.

I'm not sure I understood your last point, I operate under no such delusion, I will make no bones about the fact that if you choose to spend your life here without God, then you will do the very same in your eternity.

Robert Cheeks suggests in his comment on my last Songbook post that if there aren't any, there's really no point in me saying that Rock is ambivalent about or even resistant to modernity.

(For link fans, the video & notes may be found at http://www.calvaryccm.com/teachings/main/video/GS49.aspx) He made a very valid point: if the crucifixion was all there was to life in Christ, Jesus and His Father could've «done it over the weekend,» rather than take 33 years... especially that last week.

If you want just a bit more on the last point, see this video.

If, as I suggested in the last section, the obvious and oft - noted differences between Russell and Whitehead symbolize the current analytic - speculative split, then the kinds of similarities and (perhaps even more importantly) the areas of mutual influence, indebtedness, and philosophic enrichment to which Professor Kuntz rightly points can suggest to contemporary philosophers a neutral «dialogical territory» beyond the present, hostile philosophic «demilitarized zone,» which is no longer itself viable, interesting, or worthy of the vocation of philosophy.

You said «I set last night and came back this morning to find that you are still orbitting around me, round and round and round...» If you were the sun, you wouldn't have set last night nor would you have «come back» this morning, as those are phenomena of a vantage point on Earth.

He points out that if the last 50,000 years of human life were divided into equal life - spans of 62 years, there have been about 800 such lifetimes.

If the point of your ministry is to «restore» me, then just say it loud and clear... don't put it as the last bullet on your missional statement (or was the last bullet where BTG will engage gays but still «walk in truth»?

If the theist has time to spend at that particular point in the day and continues to respond to your posts, accuse them of «always having to get in the last word»

You might have a point if we are talking dinasaurs, but not in re: to mammals and all other creatures who have lived in the last few million years.