Sentences with phrase «last sentence does»

That figure showed there was an even distribution, so your last sentence doesn't apply either.

It's ok if that last sentence doesn't make sense, but it's all truth, every word.

This last sentence doesn't read

The last sentence does come as a surprise as the player has been labelled as a defensive midfielder.

Actually, that last sentence doesn't seem strong enough.

If from that last sentence you didn't understand my sarcasm then shall we just get straight back to the caramel talk?

(If that last sentence didn't make any sense, don't feel bad.

I'm sorry that the last sentence didn't quite make sense to me and it seems an important one.

But the changes to the last sentence do just the opposite.

In your last sentence did you mean to negate this: «the victims of the counterfeiting are almost certainly of interest to them.»

Not exact matches

C'm on» (Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz); «I've always said that if we described Twitter in three sentences, the first two would be about not putting too much fidelity on it, and the last sentence would be «we don't know.»»

My last sentence was intended as a joke and should have indicated as such, along the lines of «other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?»

The fact that Romney didn't change his position is further reinforced by his last sentence («And --- and the --- and the president's statement of my policy is completely and totally wrong.»).

I am not a Mormon and don't find it appealing or convincing but I wouldn't vote against him just because he is a Mormon.I do apologize for that last sentence.

Also, I never proposed that randomness created anything (I only argued that some simple set of laws of physics are all that need be behind the designs of nature that we observe), so I don't know why you are going on about randomness in your last few sentences.

Bernardo, even those that do what you suggest in your last sentence, often do it for «rewards» of a supranatural kind later.

In the next - to - last sentence of the Narrative, Equiano asks, «After all, what makes any event important, unless by its observation we become better and wiser, and learn «to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly before God!

He came to realize that the «presented locus» and the termini of perceptual projection did not necessarily coincide and developed the theory of «strain - feelings» to address this problem: the last two sentences of II.

'' So don't go passing judgment» There was two, not one sentence in my last reply, perhaps you should read it again.

From the standpoint of Whitehead's final theory, as interpreted in terms of Hartshorne's distinction between God's abstract nature and concrete totality, it is quite natural to interpret the last sentence as Griffin does: «The passage does not say that God as a whole must be unchanging; it only says that God's nature must remain self - consistent» (PS 15:200).

With regard to the meaning of the last sentence, I do agree with David Boucher's interpretation of reducing its meaning to being a reference to the following term's lectures.36 In my view, however, it is the last but one sentence which is of utmost importance here, referring as it does to Collingwood's concept of objective idealism, as elaborated in «Realism and Idealism» and adumbrated in «The Function of Metaphysics in Civilization.

Restrictions on what he can do and say are expected to last throughout his suspended sentence.

We may say, in theory of course, that the heart of the myth of the Last Judgment sought primarily an assurance that justice would be done, irrespective of whether the final sentence would be either for or against those who were pinning their faith upon it.

You had me till the last sentence «We should ignore every New Testament teaching that does not come directly from Yehoshua, and that is anything that is contained in any of the books of the New Testament outside of the first five (the four Synoptic Gospels plus the Acts of the Apostles).»

In truth the Revelation of St. John the Divine is the Ark of the Testament; and the Revelation of Jesus Christ was the Book hidden in this Ark and carried to me through the 2,000 years that seperated the time when John first got it; and then; (as it is written at chapter 10 of his own Revelation) at the very last sentence of that chapter; when it is said to him by the angel of the Covenant Jonathan (who John the Baptist was named after, by the way) that he «would have to prophesy again»; as to explain what his Revelation was all about: otherwise the Revelation would have absolutely sered no purpose at all; and it does; as all will soon shortly know.

The thing is, Black Six, that while your overall point is good, the last sentence implies an incorrect assumption, which is what the other posters are critiquing, In other words, you have a point, but so do they, and it's not idiotic.

Last time I tried to talk to a kid in the park, I didn't get through half a sentence before the parents yelled out, «OK, Tommy, time to go home!»

Most could keep their head above the murky waters, but I drowned in them, my mind and soul became as a vegetable, void of all emotions and life, there are ones that have my testimony when God apprehended me and manifested Himself to me, that I became One with Him in His life: I was a walking zombie and nothing more at that time, a vessel for my master use being cared for by my adult children on disability with a grade 5 education, with ADDHD and dyslexia, I couldn't even spell or string 2 sentences together that made any sense: All that has been done in my life for the last 11 yrs.

What do I mean by that last sentence?

whoops GodPot, I only read the first part and didn't see the last sentence, you can disregard the previous post.

That last sentence nearly did me in, I mean, whose house would have a smidgen left after coming in direct contact with this item?

As I was reading this post, I was thinking about asking you to do a pumpkin version and then saw your last sentence!

It's not only these two players, the last sentence was me trying to say how I do it too, esp if I'm trying to win an argument.

Maybe I didn't need to italicize the «and» on that last sentence, but you get the point.

I don't understand your last sentence.

EDIT: I didn't mean to imply with my last sentence that people who have more self - control don't care about the team as much as I do.

Don't mean to completely dispute what you're saying but, about your last sentence... are you by any means implying that we've not been creating enough chances because the teams we've played are defending too deep?

At last, apart from the first 2 sentences, a sensible comment from you without resorting to name calling and sycophantic copy and pasting... well done..

I know she has to write up a little ditty for her page to collect donations but the only sentence that matters is the very last one - that she does not want to be a mom.

Don't be scared by that last sentence if you are a mom - to - be, not everyone has that experience, and even if you do that gorgeous newborn staring back at you has no idea you are a hot mess, and he / she will look so deliciously cute you really won't notice it... mucdo that gorgeous newborn staring back at you has no idea you are a hot mess, and he / she will look so deliciously cute you really won't notice it... much.

While the last few sentences do shed some light on a few of my preferences, they are hardly the tip of the iceberg when it comes to who I am as a mom.

I put on black stretchy everything (you did read that last sentence, right?)

That last sentence is really interesting and I'd love to read more about it — do you have a source that you could link to, or remember where you read it?

To make this question on - topic, probably the last sentence could be changed to «Did the US - government deliberately tried and created such loyalty and devotion towards military service members, and how?»

@DrunkCynic: Does the last sentence not make it clear?

How do you reconcile these two sentence fragments: (1) ``... losing 191,367 people to other states in the year ending last July 1...» and (2) «As of July 1..

BTW, that last sentence is very insulting for a Westchester resident such as myself, though I don't find that surprising comming from a transit fanatic like you.

On Oct. 27 of last year, appeals court judge Karen Peters reduced Dixon's sentence and did away with his criminal record.

It's all about his executive agency, his people, although the sentencing last week of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver to 12 years in jail does ring in our ears, and probably also in the governor's.

Does my right honourable friend accept that the millions of people who voted Conservative at the last election in order to make him prime minister did not do so in order to see a reduction in the number of people sent to prison or to see those criminals given softer sentences?