Sentences with phrase «later used in court»

The process is confidential and the meeting (s) can not be later used in court to help or hurt either person's position in the case.

A Florida deposition is out - of - court oral testimony transcribed in writing for later use in court and for the purposes of gathering evidence in anticipation of trial.

Elsewhere, Collectible sought to use blockchains to both authenticate and create secondary markets for baseball trading cards, while Chainmail aimed to assist lawyers by making it easier to authenticate emails for later use in court cases.

Not exact matches

Players have noticed that the green courts in Rio play slower and offer higher bounces than hard courts used on the North American circuit leading to the U.S. Open later this month.

In the latest twist in the legal battle, Ripple filed a counterclaim in New York state court that accuses R3 of signing the deal in bad faith, and using the partnership to steal its expertise in order to develop a competing producIn the latest twist in the legal battle, Ripple filed a counterclaim in New York state court that accuses R3 of signing the deal in bad faith, and using the partnership to steal its expertise in order to develop a competing producin the legal battle, Ripple filed a counterclaim in New York state court that accuses R3 of signing the deal in bad faith, and using the partnership to steal its expertise in order to develop a competing producin New York state court that accuses R3 of signing the deal in bad faith, and using the partnership to steal its expertise in order to develop a competing producin bad faith, and using the partnership to steal its expertise in order to develop a competing producin order to develop a competing product.

The Justice Department said AT&T would use Time Warner's films and movies to force rival pay TV companies to pay «hundreds of millions of dollars more per year for Time Warner's networks» in its lawsuit filed late Monday in federal court in Washington.

The 40 - year - old entertainer said in a court filing late Tuesday that the stacks of cash in the photos are actually prop money, which is specially made for the studio lighting used in filming music videos and photo shoots.

EPA first tried to ban the use of asbestos in 1989, but its decision was struck down two years later by a federal appeals court that ruled the agency had exceeded its authority.

According to court documents released Wednesday, the lawsuit is being filed on behalf of Quebecers who have used Johnson & Johnson baby powder or Valeant's product entitled Shower to Shower in their genital area and were later diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

Cohen used a pair of court filings late Wednesday to end the lawsuits he filed in January, which claimed the dossier contained a series of false assertions about him.

Later, rather as a relief from the heavy questions about Iran, inflation and the like, Moyers had asked the president whether or not he had in fact himself made decisions — as had been reported — about the use of the White House tennis courts.

Eleven years later, with same - sex marriage now the law of the land thanks to the Supreme Court, transgender bathroom use mandatory in schools thanks to the Obama administration, and the drafting of women a serious (and Republican - supported) proposition for Congress, it's hard not to view Schlafly's anti-ERA victory as somewhat Pyrrhic.

In the latest skirmish in Australia's five - year - old milk war, some of the nation's most popular milk brands are heading to the Federal Court in a bitter fight over the rights to use the term «A2 protein» on their labelIn the latest skirmish in Australia's five - year - old milk war, some of the nation's most popular milk brands are heading to the Federal Court in a bitter fight over the rights to use the term «A2 protein» on their labelin Australia's five - year - old milk war, some of the nation's most popular milk brands are heading to the Federal Court in a bitter fight over the rights to use the term «A2 protein» on their labelin a bitter fight over the rights to use the term «A2 protein» on their labels.

The Court of Appeals for this Circuit in the Gaidry case took note of these two cases, but held them not reconcilable with the later ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Baglin v. Cusenier, 221 U. S. 680 [1 T. M. Rep. 147], wherein it was held that the fact that the primary meaning of the word «Chartreuse» was geographical did not prevent the acquisition of the exclusive right to its use as the designation of a liqueur made by the monks of the Monastery of La Grande Chartreuse.

Spano would later plead guilty in federal court to four counts of fraud for using phony documents to inflate his net worth.

While my efforts to persuade the Board of Selectmen, the town manager, and the Rec Department director to allocate permits in a more equitable fashion, and to use their power to make sure that the programs using town - owned facilities met minimum standards for inclusiveness and safety, fell on deaf ears (we ended up being forced to use for our home games a dusty field the high school had essentially abandoned), I returned to a discussion of the «power of the venue permit» 10 years later in my 2006 book, Home Team Advantage: The Critical Role of Mothers in Youth Sports, where I suggested that one of the best ways for youth sports parents to improve the safety of privately - run sports programs in their communities was to lobby their elected officials to utilize that power to «reform youth sports by exercising public oversight over the use of taxpayer - funded fields, diamonds, tracks, pools, and courts, [and] deny permits to programs that fail to abide by a [youth sports] charter» covering such topics as background checks, and codes of conduct for coaches, players, and parents.

Four years later, Taub is poised to be a star government witness as Silver's high - stakes corruption trial begins Monday in federal court in Manhattan on charges that the now ex-speaker used his Albany power to line his pockets with nearly $ 4 million by delivering — for a price.

A U.S. appeals court today upheld the legality of federally funded research on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs)-- the latest in a string of wins for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in a 3 - year legal battle with groups that for moral reasons want to block the use of these cells.

The NAEP scores they focus on do not correspond in most of the cases to the relevant years in which the court orders were actually implemented; they ignore the fact that, as in Kentucky, initial increases in funding are sometimes followed by substantial decreases in later years; and their use of NAEP scores makes no sense in a state like New Jersey, where the court orders covered only a subset of the state's students (i.e., students in 31 poor urban school districts) and not the full statewide populations represented by NAEP scores.

The Fall 2017 issue of Education Next includes an article by Ryan analyzing arguments made in court rulings on the use of race in college admissions by the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Sccourt rulings on the use of race in college admissions by the late Supreme Court justice Antonin ScCourt justice Antonin Scalia.

For instance, in late April the California Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Anaheim parents who want to use the state's parent - trigger law to turn a traditional public elementary school into a charter school.

While those who post bail using a bondsman and later fail to appear in court get tracked down by bail agents at no cost to the taxpayer, this is not the case for those who jump bail after using a credit card.

According to court documents obtained by Gamasutra, Bethesda tried to block Interplay from using said Fallout figures to market Fallout: Online in late November.

In the Court of Honor, Fischer presents 16 bronze sculptures to accompany Rodin's The Thinker; these sculptures were created using a form of crowd - sourcing, with the artist inviting guests to an exhibition space to help create clay sculptures, some of which were later cast in bronze, in a process which references Rodin's use of assistants in the creation of the many existing versions of The ThinkeIn the Court of Honor, Fischer presents 16 bronze sculptures to accompany Rodin's The Thinker; these sculptures were created using a form of crowd - sourcing, with the artist inviting guests to an exhibition space to help create clay sculptures, some of which were later cast in bronze, in a process which references Rodin's use of assistants in the creation of the many existing versions of The Thinkein bronze, in a process which references Rodin's use of assistants in the creation of the many existing versions of The Thinkein a process which references Rodin's use of assistants in the creation of the many existing versions of The Thinkein the creation of the many existing versions of The Thinker.

Last week, the Viennese nonprofit Archiv Franz West accused the Gagosian of damaging the late artist's legacy by planning to use «unauthorized» versions of his work in the exhibition, according to a Manhattan Federal Court lawsuit.

In the latest, a federal appeals court in San Francisco has ruled that U.S. officials shouldn't have allowed the Navy to use sonar at levels that could harm whales and other marine mammalIn the latest, a federal appeals court in San Francisco has ruled that U.S. officials shouldn't have allowed the Navy to use sonar at levels that could harm whales and other marine mammalin San Francisco has ruled that U.S. officials shouldn't have allowed the Navy to use sonar at levels that could harm whales and other marine mammals.

This was achieved three years later in a 2008 DC Circuit Court ruling supporting the Clinton EPA's December, 2000 decision to reduce mercury air pollution from coal and oil utilities using a MACT rule.

Answer: That will work, short - term, but see the Answer to Queston # 2 — it may be used against you later in court.

Answer: You can try text messages, but they may be used against you later in court.

Most people use Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter and other social media postings as an everyday event with little thought about how such information may later be used by an employer or against them in court proceedings in workplace related disputes.

Social Media & Digital Footprints Most people use Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter and other social media postings as an everyday event with little thought about how such information may later be used by an employer or against them in court proceedings in workplace related disputes.

In United Brotherhood, then - British Columbia Supreme Court judge Beverly McLachlin (later chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada), used these words:

Our lawyer will also hire reconstruction engineers who can use details you provide to «reconstruct» the accident scene scientifically and later provide an opinion in court.

Following the Supreme Court's latest decision, the long - cited test of whether a liquidated damages clause is a genuine pre-estimate of loss designed to compensate the innocent party rather than deter the defaulting party from committing the breach (as established by early 20th century authority of Dunlop Tyre) is no longer conclusive although the Supreme Court accepted that it might still be of use in considering simple damages clauses in standard contracts.

Suppose that you are convicted of a crime, but after your conviction, a court holds as a binding precedent in another case, that the crime that you were convicted of is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid in your circumstances (e.g. in a U.K. scenario, you are convicted of trespassing on the walkway to someone's front door since that is private property, but a later precedent hold that members of the public are legally entitled to use such a walkway unless there is a «no trespassing» sign posted which no one disputes wasn't present in your case).

That's because while incriminating statements can be used against the accused later in court, the general rule is the accused can not «bootstrap» their testimony with consistent statements they made to police, says Brodsky.

Justice Kennedy was talking about how law review case comments generally come out too late to be of use to the Court (especially in the context of deciding whether to grant certiorari in a case).

The Paris Court of Appeal decided in late January that Google was not liable to the holders of copyright in images found through the search engine, for publishing their images or for contributing to infringing uses of the images.

We also continuously update our office with the latest technology to be used in the office and in Court.

[5] In anticipation of a game later that afternoon, on October 17, 2016, Mr. Cardinal sought interim and interlocutory injunctions in the Superior Court of Justice to restrain the Cleveland Team from displaying the Team Name and / or Logo; to restrain Rogers from using or displaying the Team Name and Logo in its broadcasts... [morIn anticipation of a game later that afternoon, on October 17, 2016, Mr. Cardinal sought interim and interlocutory injunctions in the Superior Court of Justice to restrain the Cleveland Team from displaying the Team Name and / or Logo; to restrain Rogers from using or displaying the Team Name and Logo in its broadcasts... [morin the Superior Court of Justice to restrain the Cleveland Team from displaying the Team Name and / or Logo; to restrain Rogers from using or displaying the Team Name and Logo in its broadcasts... [morin its broadcasts... [more]

If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).

The old saying about pictures never lying has a new twist: the implementation of cell phone cameras means more tractor trailer accident victims are able to document the scene of an accident injury for use in court later.

As discussed in this post on the Slaw.ca blog, Ontario enacted an «Apology Act» on April 23, which «allows the communication of expressions of sorrow or regret without worrying that the comments can later be used adversely in a civil court.»

The latest twist in how the legal profession is using social networking comes from Minnesota, where dueling candidates for a seat on the Minnesota Supreme Court are hoping to find friends on Facebook.

The latest data point on this question is in: check out Roper v. Simmons, a 5 - 4 decision by Justice Kennedy invalidating the use of the death penalty for juveniles, overruling the Court's 1989 decision in Stanford v. Kentucky...»

This requirement creates a safe, non-adversarial environment so that each spouse knows that the other spouse's attorney is not attempting to gather information to use against him or her later in court.

Even though depositions usually happen in a lawyer's office, it is still a formal process that can be used later in court.

The keynote will be followed by workshop sessions on a wide variety of topics of interest to criminal, juvenile, child welfare and mental health practitioners, including but not limited to the wrongful conviction and exoneration of Frederick Clay, litigating nursing home admissions, appellate advocacy, criminal case law update, how to use social science research in your case, the new sentencing guidelines, restorative justice, ensuring language access, advanced issues in Superior Court litigation, representing emerging adults, how to contest preliminary drug test results, a practicum on mindfulness, as well as the latest from the immigration impact unit.

If a person makes a statement to police and 2 years later in a courtroom, under oath but not the same case, they make a statement that directly contradicts their witness statement does the defense have an obligation to inform the prosecution of that fact or can they use it in court to discredit the witness on the stand?

Mediations are completely confidential and the information discussed within them can not be used in Court or in any other legal action issued at a later date.