He was talking about «mathematical sophisticates blowing holes in
the latest findings of climate science.»
Not exact matches
«Moreover, the
latest developments in
climate science lend greater urgency to the case for action: Effects on natural systems are already being observed and recent
findings concerning the potential scope and magnitude
of damages from future warming are increasingly worrisome,» the report says.
The Review is a super refined weekly web publication curated by subject matter experts from Yale who summarize important research articles from leading natural and social
science journals with the hope that people can make more informed decisions using
latest research results.The Review launched this week and covers a wide range
of topics, like this brief about
climate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversit
climate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in
Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversit
Climate Change Scenarios»): They
find that simply using the traditional classification
of a species in
climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversit
climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale
of biodiversity loss.
Professor Michael Norton, EASAC's Environment Programme Director states, «Our 2013 Extreme Weather Events report — which was based on the
findings of the Norwegian Academy
of Science and Letters and the Norwegian Meteorological Institute — has been updated and the
latest data supports our original conclusions: there has been and continues to be a significant increase in the frequency
of extreme weather events, making
climate proofing all the more urgent.
Jeff Holmstead, the former head
of EPA's air office under President George W. Bush, said he
found nothing to dispute about the
latest EPA document's assessment
of the
climate science.
[T] he idea that the sun is currently driving
climate change is strongly rejected by the world's leading authority on climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.
climate change is strongly rejected by the world's leading authority on
climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.
climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.
Climate Change, which
found in its
latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements
of total solar irradiance.»
Terrell Johnson, reporting on a recent NASA publication concluding that deep ocean temperatures have not increased since 2005 (http://www.weather.com/
science/environment/news/deep-ocean-hasnt-warmed-nasa-20141007): «While the report's authors say the
findings do not question the overall
science of climate change, it is the
latest in a series
of findings that show global warming to have slowed considerably during the 21st century, despite continued rapid growth in human - produced greenhouse gas emissions during the same time.»
In the dim light
of the Nordic morning, in a picturesque post-industrial location in central Stockholm, the IPCC adopted the
latest findings on the
science of climate change.
Climate science presents a global - sized puzzle, and the
latest find in every sense gets to the roots
of one aspect
of the great carbon puzzle: where does the stuff go, and how does it get where it does?
Of course, Donald Rumsfeld was not specifically referring to climate science back in 2002, yet there can be few other disciplines so riven with uncertainties from top to bottom that are still able to attract voluble proponents enthusiastically promoting the latest findings as incontrovertible facts, to a world largely unable to question the work of scientist
Of course, Donald Rumsfeld was not specifically referring to
climate science back in 2002, yet there can be few other disciplines so riven with uncertainties from top to bottom that are still able to attract voluble proponents enthusiastically promoting the
latest findings as incontrovertible facts, to a world largely unable to question the work
of scientist
of scientists.
Seven years
later, with the release
of the IPCC AR5, we
find ourselves between the metaphorical rock and a hard place with regards to
climate science and policy:
In a new study published in the
latest issue
of the journal
Science, Geerat Vermeij
of UC Davis and Peter Roopnarine
of the California Academy
of Sciences write that
climate change is creating conditions in the Arctic similar to those
found during the warm mid-Pliocene epoch, about 3.5 million years ago, when a number
of favorable factors helped many North Pacific mollusk species invade the warming Arctic Ocean and, eventually, the North Atlantic.