Moreover, you are not just critical of the «
laughably predictable responses», you are critical of the responses that are critical of the paper, without indicating WHY that criticism supposedly is wrong (it being wrong is what you imply).
I didn't say anything complimentary about this paper, Steve McIntyre, or anyone else on the «wrong side,» but because I'm critical of
the laughably predictable responses from everyone involved, and I posted here, I * must * be the enemy.