Perhaps Herbert's conditions are met in Uganda, or will be if
that law about homosexuality passes so merely advocating a change of the law makes one guilty.
Regardless, we are not even under the law according to Judaism — we follow the Noahide ideals... and there is no Noahide
law about homosexuality (we may use the Torahnic ideals as a guide — which is basically what I am doing above).
Not exact matches
This would mean repealing anti-sodomy
laws, permitting homosexuals to serve in the military on the same terms as heterosexuals, including lessons
about homosexuality in public school sex - education programs, and legalizing homosexual marriage and divorce.
Had a religious leader, for example, cornered Jesus
about a certain person who was practicing
homosexuality, Jesus might have first deferred to the letter of God's
law.
... The Jews (just like the church now) got flippant concerning divorce... I feel Jesus didn't have to mention
homosexuality because the
Law was clear to any Jew at that time... Paul had to mention it because he was an apostle to the Gentiles who I think were more prone to
homosexuality behavior... I'm though not as learned as you... just my thought after 15 years of thinking
about this issue... The church has a sacred duty to all... even gays... we need a unified loving answer to give them... but it must be the truth... because only the truth can set us free...
When the
Law of Love becomes the measure of whether or not an act sinful, the issue is no longer
about sexual orientation, hetero or
homosexuality; but whether the act is one of expressing love or exercising power / control over another.
What if one day we come to regard biblical teachings
about homosexuality the same way we regard teachings
about slavery, or dietary
laws, or women covering their heads in church?
In fact, I've been taught that
homosexuality is just
about the worst kind of sin that there is, one we ought to protest against and make
laws about.
Everything flows from the opening sentence of the book, an expansion of a 2010 article from the Harvard Journal of
Law and Public Policy: «What we have come to call the gay marriage debate is not directly
about homosexuality, but
about marriage.»
In so far as that is the dominant view of
law in America, «gay marriage» says nothing
about the morality of
homosexuality one way or the other, it simply guarantees that all «domestic partnerships» (an alternative term considered for «civil unions») are treated equally.
The phrase, «respecting the
laws of nature and of nature's God» is widely seen as being a reference to
homosexuality, and many are quite upset
about that (Google the phrase if you are interested).
He contends that
laws about keeping kosher, for example, do not apply to Christians, while commandments
about homosexuality do.
How
about this one, since you KNOW what a pedophile is, and you KNOW what a practicing homosexual is (though you can't seem to find the words), and you KNOW that both are sinful, then you must also KNOW that since pedophilia is against the
law, then the practice of
homosexuality should also be against the
law.
A number of concerns have been raised
about holding the tournament in the Middle Eastern country due to the desert heat, it's
laws on
homosexuality and the treatment of the workers currently building the stadia, amongst other reasons.
It's what football sites are all
about... Discussing
homosexuality, redskins name,, hiring practices, guy kicking his dog in the elevator, gun
laws..
I grew up in England; I went to school as a young boy in England and I grew up at a time in England when
homosexuality was banned there, it was illegal and I lived in the period when British politicians thought it was anathema to think
about changing the
law and suddenly the activities of individuals, of groups, a certain awareness, a certain development grew and grew and grew stronger and it forced a change in
law.
While Russian officials say the
law is meant to protect children and not discriminate against gays, it appears to assume that children can be converted to
homosexuality by hearing
about it.
Amnesty International condemns adoption of homophobic legislation in Lithuania: «The
law classifies public information
about homosexuality and bisexuality alongside material that portrays physical or psychological violence and the display of dead or mutilated bodies.
«I grew up at a time in England where
homosexuality was banned, it was illegal and I lived in a period where British politicians thought it was anathema to even think
about changing the
law and then suddenly, the activities of individuals and groups... grew and grew stronger and enforced the change in the
law.»
The Divisional Court may find that there is in
law at least a third choice: continue to believe what it will (the part
about homosexuality being immoral), and continue to provide the public service as an expression of its beliefs (the part
about ministering to the needy) but do not require employees providing a public service to conform to those beliefs.
Justin Patten of the Human
Law blog writes
about the London case of a former banker at HSBC who is seeking a multimillion - dollar award in a sex bias claim involving
homosexuality.
While President Vladimir Putin has issued statements indicating that there will be no discrimination for religion, sexuality, or gender, Russia does have a current
law on their books that criminalises any positive statements
about homosexuality made to children and adolescents.