Sentences with phrase «law are in favor»

You could make the argument that the people more ignorant about the law are in favor of it; those that are more knowledgeable about the law are opposed to it.

Though laws are in favor of breastfeeding, these laws are rarely if ever applied in unorganized sectors.

@AdamZerner Even in situations where both attorneys generally believe the law is in their favor, it is likely that both parties would strike attorneys during voir dire.

And finally, to your hypothetical about both sides genuinely believing the law is in their favor, I would say it's rarely as simple as you make it seem.

In addition he also needed to have an LLC set up on Nevada or Wyoming there state laws are in favor of business owners.

Not exact matches

You would be surprised how much you learn from giving and be surprised how the laws of reciprocity eventually work in your favor.

Thiel, who also supports the idea of creating autonomous islands on which people could live and create their own laws, said he is in favor of a bi-partisan bill called the «Intimate Privacy Protection Act,» which would make it illegal to distribute explicit private images without a person's consent, and would involve criminal penalties for those who profit from doing so.

You know, some things are law, and I'm all in favor of that, and some things are common sense.

«In emerging markets, regulations have become a favored additional tactic, for example changes to tax laws or new macro prudential measures where currency weakness is a likely result.

The mere fact that politicians are asking for Zuckerberg's help in drafting new laws could certainly work in Facebook's favor.

It remains to be seen how the new tax law will affect DFW area home prices, but the new rules certainly don't favor pricier DFW sub-markets or larger luxury homes in Denton County.

«We've got casinos in Iowa, right across the river from Omaha, and the argument [in favor of changing the law], which is persuasive, is that Nebraskans go over there and deposit all their money in Iowa.

We know Sullivan does not really believe this, because his entire argument in favor of legalized homosexual marriage hinges on the recognition that public law is the most powerful tool for shaping individual attitudes.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Christians in this country need to totally abandon the two corrupt parties we have, because those who are seated in the seats of making decisions will NEVER abandon their practices, for their love of power and the love of BRIBE that comes abundantly to them from those who have means to give it, in order to receive favors in form of making our country's laws and policies to further allow them to do their self serving practice, disregarding those which they hurt by them.

People who can't stand up for themselves and are preyed upon by others typically are in favor of government regulation, laws, things of this nature to protect them.

As Russell Hittinger has shown in his book The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian Society (see chapter four), St. Thomas's point is not that the judge corrects a flawed human law in favor of the natural lLaw in a Post-Christian Society (see chapter four), St. Thomas's point is not that the judge corrects a flawed human law in favor of the natural llaw in favor of the natural lawlaw.

I believe that human actors who fail to give pride of place to moral boundaries that must never be crossed, such as the direct killing of the innocent, and who instead are ready to see their obligations in terms of moving beyond them in favor of «good results,» will be harder put «to take seriously the role that divine authority plays in morality»; for they will to that extent lose a sense of the moral limits that remind us of our finitude and anticipate consideration of a law of our being that is not one of our making.

The community in favor of PAS laws has been making significant headway in recent years.

Some groups such as the Lutherans argued that this made a new law out of the gospel, washed out all real theological concern in favor of sheer action, and was a distortion of the full gospel of judgment and redemption.

In his main work, Difference and Repetition (1968), he has shown why the conception of concrete immediacy in and between occasions must not be considered naive in a post-Hegelian sense, but post-Hegelian altogether.15 In order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization of the world into the general and the individual in favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.&raquIn his main work, Difference and Repetition (1968), he has shown why the conception of concrete immediacy in and between occasions must not be considered naive in a post-Hegelian sense, but post-Hegelian altogether.15 In order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization of the world into the general and the individual in favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.&raquin and between occasions must not be considered naive in a post-Hegelian sense, but post-Hegelian altogether.15 In order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization of the world into the general and the individual in favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.&raquin a post-Hegelian sense, but post-Hegelian altogether.15 In order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization of the world into the general and the individual in favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.&raquIn order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization of the world into the general and the individual in favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.&raquin favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.»

If majority opinion in the legislature favors some restrictions upon abortion, and there is no specific language in the Constitution on the subject, then «pro-choice» forces have to invoke something very much like a natural law duty to get their way.

casting it away as if it was a thing of no value, and rejecting the Spirit of grace in favor of returning to the law which was never meant to save anyone.

Today, admittedly, the vagueness of 2 and its ultimate basis upon inner - change has been dropped by many progressivist idealists in favor of 3a or 3b: a very - tight system of International Law, or an «EU for the world,» will save us.

We are not in favor of a Christians version of Muslim Sharia law...

I am in favor of a 3 strikes law.

The debtor had no hope of winning the case; the law was entirely in the creditor's favor.

At that time, Lader was clearly in favor of a complete liberalization of abortion laws, and he repeatedly suggested throughout the book that the main impediment to such a liberalization was the power of the «Roman Catholic hierarchy.»

What emerged was a deistic philosophy in which the ideas of sin and God receded in favor of new social control mechanisms provided by law and legitimated by conceptions of the lawfulness of nature.

«In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia,» the Pope says, «it is... never licit to obey it, or to take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it.&raquIn the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia,» the Pope says, «it is... never licit to obey it, or to take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it.&raquin a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it.&raquin favor of such a law, or vote for it.»

A small expression of favor the laborer would be able to get through his head; it would be understood in the market - town by «the highly respected cultured public,» by all ballad - mongers, in short, by the 5 times 100,000 persons who dwelt in that market - town, which with respect to its population was even a very big city, but with respect to possessing understanding of and sense for the extraordinary was a very small market - town — but this thing of becoming the Emperor's son - in - law was far too much.

That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence, and therefore all men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience, and that no particular religious sect or society ought to be favored or established by law in preferrence [sic] to others.

The author is in favor of «civil union» as a concept more in keeping with our restrained sense of law and less tilted toward the equating of gay and heterosexual unions.

(17) This contextualization can help us reflect on the judicial system in North America, for it allows us to penetrate the politicization of the rule of law when judgments are handed down that favor order over justice.

Von Campenhausen believes that if the story were simply a legend «it would not have specified three women (who, by Jewish law, were not competent to testify) as the decisive witnesses ’25 and he is supported at this point by H. H. Rex who claimed that «This is in itself a point in favor of the authenticity of the tradition.

The third possibility will be favored by those who make their own the anterior existential decision, which — as even Bultmann admits — was imported from Greek thought at the beginning of Western science, and on which that science is largely based even today — viz., the existential decision that the individual is no more than a specific instance of a general cosmic law and order which is capable of being expressed in a terminology which is at bottom quite simple and which is detachable from existence.

So are you happy with that to happen because of the no faith that is being followed by many who are in favor of «Jungle Law» rather than any heavenly law...Law» rather than any heavenly law...law...???

So when the people of Israel reject a relationship of love in favor of a religion of law, it is not surprising that this religion of law exponentially increases in complexity.

George Mason, a member of the Con - sti - tu - tion - al Convention and recognized as The Father of the Bill of Rights submitted this proposal for the wording of the First Amendment All men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience and that no particular sect or society of Christians ought to be favored or established by law in preference to others.

You'll notice, for instance, that they are very much in favor of judicial authority (which includes its enforcement mechanisms, like the police) maintaining law and order, policing the border, and so on.

An example of a religious argument in favor of Sunday closing laws is «God commands us to honor the Sabbath Day and keep it holy.»

Thus heavy viewers of religious programs are more likely than light viewers to describe themselves as conservative, to oppose a nuclear freeze, to favor tougher laws against pornography, and to have voted in the last election.

That's why I believe that grace is not only God's unmerited favor displayed in his kindness, but that it also EMPOWERS US TO DEFEAT SIN, something that the law could not do.

This most likely will be decided in the courts and since most courts keep ruling in gays favor they should be able to over turn all the unconstitutional laws prejudice bigots have been trying to pass.

It may well possibly be that the goddesses were daughters - in - law due the ugliness factors of elemental goddesses and yes the elemental gods themselves were also ugly but they did vex the celestial women to gain favors with them therefore daughters - in - law goddesses.

But Moses, while living as a favored son - in - law in the home of Jethro, is confronted and the course of his life radically changed by «Yahweh,» a name previously unknown to Moses but referring in very meaning to the One God.

Even the point about what is best for other creatures, which may seem very modern, is not without foundation in Hebrew Scriptures in such passages as the law against taking the hen - bird as well as the eggs from the nest (Deut 22:6), or this saying from Proverbs: «A righteous man has regard for the life of his beast» (12:10), where, be it noted, the quality that makes a man considerate of his working animals is not prudence or good business sense but «righteousness,» a point all the more significant when we remember that in the Hebrew Scriptures one of the marks of righteousness is not mere evenhandedness but active favor to the weak and deprived.

This decision — I'm still calling it 5 - 4 in favor of Hobby Lobby — is a direct result of Citizens United (the Corporations Are People case), and indeed allows anyone to use religious objections as a magic phrase to allow anyone to break any law they like...

Do you really think that Sarah doesn't mean that we should have law as the founding fathers would have had it, or that she wouldn't be in complete favor of laws based on the bible?

The recommendation given in the law books in favor of sanctioning the marriage in the mosque is not generally followed.