Sentences with phrase «law are responsible for the actions»

Not against the individuals involved, but against the chief officers of the forces involved, who in law are responsible for the actions of officers acting on their behalf.

Not exact matches

Since ALSA came into law the potential use of offsetting has been mentioned in several provincial policy documents, such as Responsible Action: A Plan for Alberta's Oil Sands (2009), the Woodland Caribou Policy for Alberta (2011), the Lower Athabasca Regional Plan (2012), and the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (2014).

In addition, you agree that you are solely responsible for actions and communications undertaken or transmitted in the course of your usage of this site, and that you will comply with all laws that apply or may apply to your use of or activities on this site or in respect of the Content.

In the U.S., in addition to legal provisions regarding the health, safety, and education of children, additional parental responsibility laws outlining the extent to which parents are held financially responsible for the actions of their children have been enacted in each of the 50 states.

The legislature adopts the county budget and is responsible for all actions related to local laws, including adopting, amending or rescinding laws.

Should they be held morally responsible for their actions and found guilty in a court of law?

We also need more education on: • The importance and necessity of spaying and neutering, so we can end pet overpopulation • Ending puppy mills once and for all, so we can end the senseless suffering of mama dogs whose feet often times never touch the ground • The importance of micro-chipping, so beloved pets can return home • The importance of vaccinations, so we can eradicate diseases like parvo that leave innocent puppies suffering • Updating our licensing laws so that pet «owners» are held responsible for their animal's actions, not the animal.

To the fullest extent allowed by law, the Priority Pass Group of companies accepts no responsibility for the actions of the cardholder when using any participating lounge and shall not be responsible for any personal belongings brought into a lounge by cardholders.

In other words, why isn't the scientific community incorporating this thinking as it tries (as it should and must) to do a much better job educating the public, educating law makers, and insisting on the need for responsible action?

The only thing that UEA can argue is that the law was broken by specific individuals and that it should not be held responsible for their illegal actions.

Under both common law and civil law systems, those responsible for harmful actions can only be held liable if their actions infringe a legal standard, such as negligence or nuisance.

The most recent outcry was in the U.S. and resulted in a class action settlement with the Law School Admissions Council (who are responsible for administering the LSAT).

In Australian criminal law, you are responsible for your actions no matter how much you chose to drink.

In this blog post, we will address a number of issues relating to how the law treats children's reckless actions and who can be held responsible for resulting damages.

Personal injury law offers an accident victim the opportunity to bring the responsible party to justice for their actions and in civil court this is achieved through monetary damages.

Personal injury law is different from criminal law because a private party, rather than the government, takes action against the person responsible for injuries.

Furthermore, our auto accident law firm in Washington, DC strongly advocates for victims rights and ensuring wrongdoers are held responsible for their careless actions.

At Strong Law Offices, we are committed to holding negligent corporations and tortfeasors responsible for their actions.

It presages a law captured by the rhetoric of the right to freedom of expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise of that right; a law in which, under the guise of the right to freedom of expression, the «right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance in the nature of public disorder; a law in which an impoverished amoral concept of «public order» is judicially ordained; a law in which the right to freedom of expression trumps — or tramples upon — other rights and values which are the vital rights and properties of a free and democratic society; a law to which any number of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law in which good and decent people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an action for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the dignity of the persons adversely affected by those asserting their right to freedom of expression in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law in which the mores or standards of society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations of citizens in a free and democratic society; and a law marked by a lack of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale in a civil and civilised society.

If the child is too young to be legally responsible then surely his guardians should be held accountable for his actions and be charged with causing distress and alarm (or similar local law)

2) That each principal of a law practice be responsible for ensuring that all reasonable action is taken to ensure that: (i) all the legal practitioners within the law practice comply with their professional obligations and (ii) the legal services provided by the law practice are provided in accordance with the applicable professional obligations;

Accident victims in Florida are protected by our state personal injury laws, which are designed to hold those responsible for harmful their actions.

Our goal at Dana J. Watts, Attorney at Law, is to hold negligent drivers responsible for their careless and damaging actions.

At Rogan Law we recognize how serious these injuries are and understand that victims and their families need the aggressive representation of a skilled lawyer to have an opportunity to bring the responsible person to justice for their actions.

You agree that OLM is in no way responsible for the advice, actions, or inactions of the attorneys, law firms, legal financial service providers or other legal service providers that may contact you.

Our lawyers have participated in the government's legislative processes, e.g. in the government's Expert Committee responsible for drafting the Finnish law implementing the EU directive on antitrust damages actions; co-authored the first Finnish book on antitrust damages actions; and been chairman and speakers in the most notable competition law seminars in Finland, and also lecturing abroad.

There are situations, however, where the law holds a third party responsible for that person's actions, even though that third party did nothing to directly cause the injury.

With these different laws comesvarious theories of liability that must be analyzed and evaluated in order to hold a person or company responsible for its actions.

Simply put, the appeal adjudicator and Board found that the law is the law, and that «unfairness» of holding the corporate directors responsible for outstanding wages given the owner's actions could not factor into the decision.

If you conclude that the actions of the CBC did not breach any laws, were not actuated by malice, or did not fall outside the scope of responsible communication, there would be no basis upon which you can find the CBC defendants liable for invasion of privacy.

An Omaha bus accident lawyer from Inkelaar Law could evaluate the facts and circumstances of your case and ensure all potentially responsible parties — including cities, municipalities, school boards, bus drivers, and bus companies — are held accountable for their actions.

The Compulsory Financial Responsibility Law imposed in Pasadena requires everyone who owns, maintains or drives a motor vehicle to be responsible for their actions, financially.

It has always been the case that under agency law, the master / principal was responsible for the actions of the servant.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained

I would imagine that the «ratio» of law - suits driven by REALTOR (r) s» alleged actions vs those driven by privates» alleged actions would be similar; of course the raw numbers will be much higher for REALTOR (r) driven law - suits because REALTOR (r) s are responsible for the huge majority of transactions.