These courses provide foreign - trained lawyers with a foundation in American common
law doctrine as well as legal writing and research skills.
He offers his work as a «first step toward reclaiming natural -
law doctrine as an exegetical, and not solely philosophical, project» that is, «natural law» as understood by the Christian tradition prior to the modern reconfiguration of natural law.»
Not exact matches
The
doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity (IJI) holds that a provincial
law that impairs the core competence of a federal head of jurisdiction (in this case the TransMountain pipeline
as a federally regulated interprovincial work or undertaking) will be inapplicable to the federal matter.
It was only if those requirements were relaxed
as a matter of federal
law that it would become necessary to consider if those requirements could continue to apply ex proprio motu, or if they were inoperative or inapplicable by virtue of the
doctrines of paramountcy and / or interjurisdictional immunity.
As Montgomery puts it: «Science and theology form and test their respective theories in the same way; the scientific theorizer attempts objectively to formulate conceptual Gestalts (hypotheses, theories,
laws) capable of rendering Nature intelligible, and the theologian endeavors to provide conceptual Gestalts (
doctrines, dogmas) which will «fit the facts» and properly reflect the norms of Holy Scripture.»
I think we agree on the fact that it is by faith that all are saved i have no problem with that and its in that that there is unity.You find within any christian modern church
law can be mixed with Grace that is not peculiar to any domination maybe it is more extreme in some.Where there are believers there are works of the flesh such
as pride and self reliance.I was thinking today the word says if we believe in our hearts and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord then you shall be saved.Its not a hard
doctrine to believe thats in its basic form.The seventh day have tacked on to that belief adherence to the sabbath that is sadly how denominations spring up.In the anglican church we still recite the apostles creed how many church still do that today
as a basis for there faith in Jesus Christ.Your statement that some are saved is just
as true to those who go to modern christian churchs who say they are christian but walk according to the flesh..
Doctrine and Covenants 134:7 7 We believe that rulers, states, and governments have a right, and are bound to enact
laws for the protection of all citizens in the free exercise of their religious belief; but we do not believe that they have a right in justice to deprive citizens of this privilege, or proscribe them in their opinions, so long
as a regard and reverence are shown to the
laws and such religious opinions do not justify sedition nor conspiracy.
The Bible witnesses to the building up of the «kingdom of God» on earth and the prophetic development of
doctrine which is a further expression of the Unity
Law of creation itself
as God framed it.
«Biblical natural
law,» he argues, «avoids the self - cleaving tendency in anthropocentric natural -
law doctrine and instead recognizes human fulfillment
as achieved through imitation of the divine ecstasis.»
So let me try and get this straight, if religious
doctrine does not define some practice
as against the
law or evil but yet the laity performs these unlawful acts, it keeps the church free from culpability?
You speak on what is «True
Doctrine», could we also point to something such
as the Consti; tution and the daily court room arguments of lawyers and clerks who feel that they alone know and understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the
laws of this land?
His devotion to the Torah exhibits a knowledge of both written and oral
law (a basic definition of Pharisaism
as opposed to Sadducism and Essenism), and he repeatedly affirmed the Pharisaic
doctrine of the resurrection of the body and the eternal life of the soul.
For the others, I have considerable respect and at least some sympathy — but somewhere along the winding trail from natural
law to theological
doctrine, he and I part company (though I'd happily tag along
as what the Communists used to call a fellow traveler, if he'd tolerate the company).
Much of the Thomism criticized by Barth did appear to treat reason and natural
law as though they were independent of a Christian
doctrine of God.
For Novak, however, nothing could be more disastrous for Judaism than to admit Socrates, Plato, the Stoics, Grotius, and Kant into the operative logic of Jewish jurisprudence, for not only did the ancient advocates of natural
law such
as Plato and the Stoics lack a
doctrine of creation, but even Grotius and Kant» devout monotheists though they were» imported a false philosophy into God's sovereign dealings with the human race:
This quintessential Jewish
doctrine held that held that god had chosen the Jews
as his favorite people and would look after them if he kept his
law — circu.mcising boys, not working on the Sabbath etc..
In this decision the Supreme Court of the nation established the
doctrine of «separate but equal»
as the
law of the land.
How we are to make place theologically for the reality of Judaism, where the
Law is the center of religious life, in light of the Church's confession of Christ
as Lord and the
doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not at all evident to me.
Finally, though they are not
as numerous, but still quite important in their influence, there are Reconstructionists, who aspire to replace civil codes with biblical
laws, even to the point, among hard - liners, of making homosexuality, adultery, blasphemy, propagation of false
doctrine, and incorrigible behavior by children punishable by death.
So Deuteronomy, proclaiming the
doctrine of Yahweh's unity, proclaimed
as an indispensable accompaniment the
law of one sanctuary.
(3) Probabilism is theologically deep, going back to John and Paul's scriptural teaching that Spirit - filled persons are «taught of God,» and to Thomas Aquinas's
doctrine that the primary
law for the believer is the grace of the Holy Spirit poured into the heart, while all written
law — including even Scripture,
as well
as the teachings of the popes and councils — is secondary.
Western culture may be compared to a lake fed by the stream of Hellenism, Christianity, science, and these contributions might offer an extremely valuable way of considering the conceptions of a life of reason, the principle of an ordered and intelligible world, the ideas of faith, of a personal God, of the absolute value of the human individual, the method of observation and experiment, and the conception of empirical
laws,
as well
as the
doctrines of equality and of the brotherhood of man.
J. M. Sterrett defines Antinomianism
as follows: «In its widest sense the term is used to designate the
doctrines of extreme fanatics who deny subjection to any
law other than the subjective caprices of the empirical individual, though this individual is generally credited
as the witness and interpreter of the Holy Spirit.»
Heterodox mystical ideas continued to exist in certain circles in Indonesia in spite of the influence of the many orthodox Sufi orders and in spite of the influence of orthodox Sufi writers such
as al - Ghazali, who introduced a synthesis of the fundamental
doctrines, the
law, and Sufism.
The 1985 Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith Instruction on Respect for Human Life states, «By virtue of its substantial union with a spiritual soul, the human body can not be... evaluated in the same way
as the body of animals... The natural moral
law expresses and lays down the purposes, rights and duties which are based upon the bodily and spiritual nature of the human person.»
And when it comes to immunizing such «choices» from legal restriction or even private remonstration, the Court's liberals can be counted upon to flip on the switch of what Justice Antonin Scalia, writing in dissent, describes
as «the ad hoc nullification machine that [is] set in motion to push aside whatever
doctrines of constitutional
law stand in the way of the highly favored practice of abortion.»
Surveying the American past with Evangelicals
as their focus, Finke and Stark discover the same «
law» of American church history that Kelley did two decades ago: «To the degree that denominations rejected traditional
doctrines and ceased to make serious demands on their followers, they ceased to prosper.»
Although not a
law per - se, executive privilege was accepted by the Supreme Court of the United States
as an application of the seperation of powers
doctrine from the United States Constitution (see: United States v Nixon).
People might be quick to reinterpret this and say that anarchism is a
doctrine of selfishness, where the strong quickly take advantage of disorder and seize power for themselves; therefore,
laws are inevitable
as the holders of power regulate society.
In his annual and final report into intelligence gathering, Sir Swinton Thomas has called for the end of the so - called Wilson
Doctrine, in order that no person is seen
as being «above the
law».
The union's lawsuit accuses the city of violating the Taylor
Law, which granted public employees collective bargaining rights, known
as the Triborough
Doctrine.
As defined in publications of the Institute for Creation Research and in
laws passed or under consideration by several state legislatures, this
doctrine includes the statement that the entire universe was created relatively recently, i.e., less than 10,000 years ago.
If First Sale rights, or a similar legal
doctrine, is recognised in case
law or statute
as covering ebook sales, there could be interesting consequences, particularly if DRM is also challenged on similar grounds.
While some argue that the «first sale»
doctrine should allow users to transfer an e-book in the same manner
as a hard - copy book, these contentious restrictions may be valid under current
law.
Paragraph 24 anticipates the
doctrine of EU
law consistent construction, most recently expounded in Bernhard Pfeiffer and others, [2004] EU: C: 2004:584 C397 / 01 to C403 / 01
as well
as state liability
as expounded in Francovich and others [1991] ECR I 5357 C 6/90 and C 9/90.
In part 3, the SCC states that it «must, however, complete» the CJEU's response with its own general
doctrine on the relationship between the Spanish Constitution and EU
law,
as set out in SCC Declaration 1/2004.
I believe that thanks to the national constitutional
doctrines on the «conditional» primacy of EU
law (on the «conditional supremacy» of EU
law in the UK, see the post by Garner on this blog)
as well
as to the corresponding EU provisions — the constitutional identity clause in Article 4 (2) TEU and the authorisation to apply higher national standards of fundamental rights in Article 53 CFR — national constitutional or apex courts can provide necessary checks and balances on the ECJ enormous judicial power.
In a jurisdiction that has prided itself on the importance of «
doctrine» in interpreting the
law, the fact that the major French language university opts for content with the lowest common denominator, while a foreign owned commercial publisher offers an authoritative work by leading academics and legal practitioners, is a remarkable case of role reversal,
as well
as a reflection on how times have changed.
In a short judgment (concerned with the extent to which courts were bound by Privy Council decisions) Lord Neuberger said: «In a common
law system, where the
law is in some areas made, and the
law is in virtually all areas developed, by judges, the
doctrine of precedent, or
as it is sometimes known stare decisis, is fundamental.
Under the
doctrine of implied repeal, the 2010 Act would prevail over the Regulation, but
as retained EU
law the Regulation will prevail over the 2010 Act.
In fulfilling its role outlined in Article 19 TEU to «ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the
law is observed», the Court has not only functioned
as a «motor of integration» in substantive areas of the
law, including citizens» rights, but has also ensured its own position at the apex of the interpretative hierarchy through establishing and refining the
doctrines of direct effect and the supremacy of EU
law.
Restrictions on non-lawyers practicing
law seemed
as fundamental to our legal system
as the hallowed
doctrine of judicial review.
Justice Gorsuch wrote separately to express his view that the vagueness
doctrine could be traced to English
law and the Constitution
as it was originally understood.
Its shift in
doctrine is construed
as a reinterpretation of Article 24 (2) of the Constitution, resulting from the interpretive guidance provided by international treaties and case
law.
The striking difference was that while in a common
law faculty, first year students are inundated with judgments, civil
law students read a half - dozen judgments and mostly relied on a text, «
doctrine»
as civilians call it: a book that summarized the area of
law, usually by the prof or another leading scholar.
[18] To the extent the
doctrine of champerty and maintenance remains relevant in Canadian common
law, even
as means of protecting the courts and vulnerable litigants against abuses, its purpose is not and was never intended to be achieved by conferring on the courts the discretion to inquire into and approve or disapprove of a plaintiff's funding arrangements
as a condition precedent to instituting or pursuing litigation.
As Justice Stratas put it to the attendees, should Canada ever be gripped by some form of threat or disorder, leading the government to abridge the civil liberties of many Canadians, do we want the judge deciding the constitutionality of the government's action to be able to turn to a body of constitutional
law «based on fundamental principles, consistently applied over decades» — in other words, «settled legal
doctrine» — or do we want the judge deciding the issue based upon «her or his own worldview?»
As long ago as 2010, the Law Commission made suggestions for reform of the identification doctrine as part of a wider consultatio
As long ago
as 2010, the Law Commission made suggestions for reform of the identification doctrine as part of a wider consultatio
as 2010, the
Law Commission made suggestions for reform of the identification
doctrine as part of a wider consultatio
as part of a wider consultation.
there is a new desire in the free public access to
law movement to include not just primary materials of legislation and case
law, but also secondary materials such
as treatises and
law journal articles (or
doctrine) in the systems.
In this regard, this case follows some earlier ones, which are sometimes referred to
as the «high water mark» of RCD jurisprudence, in which conduct was not required to be expressly mandated in order for the
doctrine to apply (particularly, the Jabour case: Canada (Attorney General) v.
Law Society (British Columbia), 1982 CarswellBC 133 (S.C.C.)-RRB-.