According to an executive action Trump signed Wednesday, cities that don't comply with federal immigration enforcement agents «are not eligible to receive federal grants, except as deemed necessary for
law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary.»
Not exact matches
Thus, THE ADOPTION
BY THE AUTHORITIES OF THE «TRNC» OF CIVIL, ADMINISTRATIVE OR CRIMINAL
LAW MEASURES, AND THEIR APPLICATION OR ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THAT TERRITORY, may be regarded as HAVING A LEGAL basis in domestic law for the purposes of the Convention&raqu
LAW MEASURES, AND THEIR APPLICATION OR
ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THAT TERRITORY, may be regarded as HAVING A LEGAL basis in domestic
law for the purposes of the Convention&raqu
law for the
purposes of the Convention».
It might actually work and not just turn the legal tobacco consumption into illegal tobacco consumption of the same volume which then needs to be suppressed
by law enforcement personnel which needs to be hired for this
purpose.
CALEA's
purpose is to enhance the ability of
law enforcement agencies to conduct electronic surveillance
by requiring that telecommunications carriers and manufacturers of telecommunications equipment modify and design their equipment, facilities, and services to ensure that they have built - in surveillance capabilities, allowing federal agencies to wiretap any telephone traffic; it has since been extended to cover broadband internet and VoIP traffic.
During the course of Bharara's federal investigation, the Cuomo administration in several instances denied FOIL requests
by citing a different exemption: that certain records were being «compiled» for «
law enforcement purposes.»
If you believe that any user of this Website is harassing you or is otherwise using personal information about you for unlawful
purposes, we encourage you to first inform local
law enforcement authorities and then to contact us via The Feedback Form so that we may take appropriate action to block further use of the Website
by any user who is using this Website and information obtained from it for improper
purposes.
Consistent with NSBA's position as outlined in its «friend of the court» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as
law enforcement agents, and the statements made
by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary
purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.»
Upon submission of fingerprints for this
purpose, the school district shall request the Department of
Law Enforcement to forward the fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for federal criminal records checks, and the fingerprints shall be retained
by the Department of
Law Enforcement under s. 1012.32 (3)(a) and (b).
«Some of my customers come in dressed in sweats, and for all practical
purposes, on the wrong day, they may be qualified as «unpredictable»
by law enforcement — yet the person is a millionaire,» he says.
German Shepherd Dogs and Belgian Malinois remain the most popular choice for patrol dogs
by law enforcement, and many are dual -
purpose canines who also perform detection work.
There are a host of broad exemptions that will continue to allow breeding for (1) use of dogs as service, guide or therapy animals,
by search and rescue,
law enforcement and other government agencies; (2) use of dogs for herding or as livestock guardian dogs or hunting dogs; (3) dogs or cats registered with the American Kennel Club, the Cat Fancier Association or other recognized registry or trained and kept for the
purpose of show, field trials or agility trials; and (4) dogs or cats whose owner has obtained an unaltered animal permit.
«Animal control officer» means any individual employed, contracted with, or appointed
by the animal control authority for the
purpose of aiding the
enforcement of this act or any other
law or ordinance relating to the licensure of animals, control of animals, or seizure and impoundment of animals, and includes any state or local
law enforcement officer or other employee whose duties in whole or in part include assignments that involve the seizure and impoundment of any animal; and
The
purpose of the Animal Welfare Program is to ensure humane and proper treatment of animals
by developing, implementing and administering a comprehensive program that upholds the animal welfare
laws of Maine through communication, education and
enforcement.
A Good Samaritan, Lizet Avila, alerted
law enforcement officials that she believed dogs were «being rented for
purposes of sex with men»
by a man in South Stockton, Calif, according to KRON4.
(7) records or information compiled for
law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such
law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with
enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or to an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled
by criminal
law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or
by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished
by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for
law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for
law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the
law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; [the
law enforcement exemption]
Caltrops tossed out of a fleeing truck and disabling
law -
enforcement vehicles (
by puncturing tires) are «dangerous weapons» for
purposes of sentence enhancement.
Provisions in these agreements contemplated the possibility that disclosure may be required
by law in response to a court order or for
enforcement purposes.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the force is used or threatened
by another person for the
purpose of doing something that they are required or authorized
by law to do in the administration or
enforcement of the
law, unless the person who commits the act that constitutes the offence believes on reasonable grounds that the other person is acting unlawfully.
(3) For the
purposes of the recognition or
enforcement of any award within the DIFC, an original award or an original Arbitration Agreement shall be duly certified if it is a copy that is certified in the manner required
by the
laws of the jurisdiction in the place of arbitration or elsewhere.
Because contrary state
laws for which an exception is available only under section 1178 (a)(2)(A) will be preempted
by operation of
law unless and until the Secretary acts to grant an exception, there will be an ascertainable compliance standard for compliance
purposes, and
enforcement action would be appropriate where such compliance did not occur.
We did not intend to preempt generally state and other mandatory reporting
laws, and in § 164.512 (f)(1)(i) of the final rule, we explicitly permit covered entities to disclose protected health information for
law enforcement purposes as required
by other
law.
Other sections of this rule allow covered entities to reasonably rely on certain representations
by law enforcement officials (see § 164.514, regarding verification,) and require disclosure of the minimum necessary protected health information for this
purpose.
We reviewed the important
purposes for which some commenters said government agencies needed protected health information, and we believe that most of those needs can be met through the other categories of permitted uses and disclosures without authorization allowed under the final rule, including provisions permitting covered entities to disclose information (subject to certain limitations) to government agencies for public health, health oversight,
law enforcement, and otherwise as required
by law.
Law enforcement access to protected health information in the first instance, absent any re-disclosure by law enforcement, impinges on individuals» privacy interests and must therefore be justified by a public purpose that outweighs individuals» privacy interes
Law enforcement access to protected health information in the first instance, absent any re-disclosure
by law enforcement, impinges on individuals» privacy interests and must therefore be justified by a public purpose that outweighs individuals» privacy interes
law enforcement, impinges on individuals» privacy interests and must therefore be justified
by a public
purpose that outweighs individuals» privacy interests.
We reviewed the important
purposes identified in the comments for government access to protected health information, and believe that the disclosures of protected health information that should appropriately be made without individuals» authorization can be achieved through the other disclosures provided for in the final rule, including provisions permitting covered entities to disclose information (subject to certain limitations) to government agencies for public health, research, health oversight,
law enforcement, and otherwise as required
by law.
Similarly, because information disclosed to a grand jury is vital to
law enforcement purposes and is covered
by secrecy protection, this rule allows disclosure with no further process.
Similarly, mandatory reports of violence - related injuries may implicate suspected perpetrators, as well as victims, and compliance with such
laws could be blocked
by the proposed requirement that disclosures about suspects was similarly limited to a response to
law enforcement inquiries for the specific
purpose of identifying the suspect.
The final rule requires covered entities to obtain authorization to use or disclose psychotherapy notes for
purposes listed in § 164.512, with the following exceptions: An authorization is not required for use or disclosure of psychotherapy notes when the use or disclosure is required for
enforcement of this rule, in accordance with § 164.502 (a)(2)(ii); when required
by law, in accordance with § 164.512 (a); when needed for oversight of the covered health care provider who created the psychotherapy notes, in accordance with § 164.512 (d); when needed
by a coroner or medical examiner, in accordance with § 164.512 (g)(1); or when needed to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety, in accordance with § 164.512 (j)(1)(i).
The requirement that covered entities disclose the minimum necessary protected health information consistent with the
purpose of the disclosure applies to disclosures of protected health information about victims to
law enforcement, unless the disclosure is required
by law.
The requirement also did not apply to uses and disclosures made: pursuant to the compliance and
enforcement provisions of the rule; as required
by law and permitted
by the regulation without individual authorization;
by a covered health care provider to a health plan, when the information was requested for audit and related
purposes.
An authorization is not required for use or disclosure of psychotherapy notes when required for
enforcement purposes, in accordance with subpart C of part 160 of this subchapter; when mandated
by law, in accordance with § 164.512 (a); when needed for oversight of the health care provider who created the psychotherapy notes, in accordance with § 164.512 (d); when needed
by a coroner or medical examiner, in accordance with § 164.512 (g)(1); or when needed to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety, in accordance with § 164.512 (j)(1)(i).
Except for disclosures required
by law as permitted
by paragraph (f)(1) of this section, a covered entity may disclose protected health information in response to a
law enforcement official's request for such information for the
purpose of identifying or locating a suspect, fugitive, material witness, or missing person, provided that:
The new § 164.512 includes paragraphs on: Uses and disclosures required
by law; uses and disclosures for public health activities; disclosures about victims of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence; uses and disclosures for health oversight activities; disclosures for judicial and administrative proceedings; disclosures for
law enforcement purposes; uses and disclosures about decedents; uses and disclosures for cadaveric donation of organs, eyes, or tissues; uses and disclosures for research
purposes; uses and disclosures to avert a serious threat to health or safety (which we had called «emergency circumstances» in the NPRM); uses and disclosures for specialized government functions (referred to as «specialized classes» in the NPRM); and disclosures to comply with workers» compensation
laws.
Section 164.528 (a)(2) of the final rule states that an individual's right to receive an accounting of disclosures to a health oversight agency,
law enforcement official, or for national security or intelligence
purposes may be temporarily suspended for the time specified
by the agency or official.
Covered entities are not required to include in the accounting disclosures to the individual as provided in § 164.502; disclosures for facility directories, disclosures to persons involved in the individual's care, or other disclosures for notification
purposes as provided in § 164.510; disclosures for national security or intelligence
purposes as provided in § 164.512 (k)(2); disclosures to correctional institutions or
law enforcement officials as provided in § 164.512 (k)(5); or any disclosures that were made
by the covered entity prior to the compliance date of the rule for that covered entity.
As reported a few days ago, the U.K. is set to introduce emergency legislation to respond to a recent ruling
by Europe's top court, which struck down an EU - wide
law forcing communications firms to hang on to subscriber data for
law enforcement purposes.
The Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children is incorporated ``... for the
purpose of awakening interest in the abuses to which children are exposed
by... parents and guardians, and to help the
enforcement of existing
laws on the subject, procure needed legislation and for kindred work...»