Traditional library metrics are less helpful for
law firm libraries compared to public or academic libraries; for example, circulation statistics are often used as an indicator of library usage and what parts of the library collection are in highest demand.
Not exact matches
In consideration of the fact that no clear justification has been provided to substantiate the amount claimed and the fact that I regard legal computerized research, unless otherwise proven, as office overhead expense as it
compares to the subscription services
law firms library had to maintain in the past and which were also considered office overhead, the disbursements claimed for electronic legal research are not allowed.
Your remarks about
law firm library collection decisions
compared with those in a
law school
library decisions, I believe, apt.
Included in the value added services from a
law firm library are items collected or subscribed to, but the «stuff» we make available and hard costs associated are simply numbers that are easy to show, share, and
compare apples to apples over last year.