Sentences with phrase «law of evolution»

The willingness to contribute to those expenses and the effects on the long - run capital stock of the economy depend on perceptions on how they will modify the law of evolution of probabilities of the shock and the standard of living after the shock.

There's the Law of Evolution, and the Theory of Evolution.

Darwin would be laughing in his grave knowing his law of evolution is hard at work here.

Then it will become the «law of evolution» and there will be no further debate on this topic.

Leave the LAW OF EVOLUTION alone.

Ace, finally someone, gave me the 5 laws of evolution, implied from darwin.

I agree with you, I have yet to see any of them post their claimed 5 laws of evolution as you asked for multiple times, nor have I heard of anything evolution said to back up it's claims to having done anything at all.

and it did so because time is a dimension of the space time continuum, that under sufficient conditions allows passage forward and backward like all spacial dimensions, thus the laws of evolution for the universe are capable of spontaneously creating themselves.

If it is true that, bound by the collective interaction of its liberties, the human social group can not escape from certain irreversible laws of evolution, does this mean that, observed along its axis of «greatest complexity» (i.e. increasing liberty) the World is coiling upon itself with as much sureness as it is in other respects radiating outwards and explosively expanding?

The comment on earth cycling was a direct response to Doc's post listing the «5 Laws of Evolution» The for law stated the earth is not cycling yet ift is at least in some ways therfore a flaw.

The laws of evolution, whatever they may be, are not in competition with God, but are a reflection and revelation of God's richness.

It was, of course, a display of his own, with his paintings after product logos (said to obey laws of evolution discovered in laboratory tests) and messages in black all but tailor - made for Christopher Wool — from Another Painting to Career Suicide.

Not exact matches

Evolution does not affect overall entropy in a manner inconsistent with the laws of physics on a properly defined scale in space and time — especially when you consider things like failed mutations, decomposition of organisms, etc..

«Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics.»

The Theory of Evolution is comprised of no less than 5 laws.

you are either for creationism or for science while ignoring what people such as myself believe that, yes, God created us but through the process of evolution according to the laws of His Nature.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

As for the Second Law of Thermodynamics, this has nothing to do with biological evolution.

To say that evolution is in qustion, because man can't explain where the laws of nature comes from is quite frankly... not reasonably (I am trying to be nice here).

You think that this law written in all of us was caused by evolution?

You also wrote, «How does evolution get around the second LAW of thermodynamics?

Gradualism, or alterations to biology via numerous successive, slight modifications, is one of teh 5 laws in the Theory of Evolution.

Our laws are modern laws, created by the evolution of the human mind.

Some new additions to the theory of evolution could (like it has done before) very well make it better, or perhaps a new theory could turn up that explains things even better like it happened to Newtons theories on gravity with Einsteins theories of relativity, but rocketengineers often still use Newtons laws because they are good enough for many, many apllications.

Catholic theology has never really had a quarrel with the idea that the present species of plants and animals are the result of a long process of evolution» or with the idea that this process has unfolded according to natural laws.

If someone believes that the only alternatives are that God is a personal super-designer of the cosmos, a kind of cosmic Steve Jobs, or the whole show was put together by evolution over billions of years, how could one possibly convince this person that the natural law is part of the divine providence for the cosmos?

the theory of evolution will never be a law - they are distinctly different, they answer different questions.

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

So have you managed to falsify any of the 5 laws that comprise the theory of evolution yet?

The theory of evolution comprises 5 laws.

Also, how does evolution work with the law of thermodynamics?

Georgetown law professor Drinan fills a gap in the literature with this concise, readable survey of the evolution of human rights protection from the late 1940s to the present.

So strong was their influence that they succeeded in having laws passed in some Southern states prohibiting the teaching of evolution.

7 We are applying the law of continuity here, according to which «nothing could ever burst forth as final across the different thresholds successively traversed by evolution (however critical they be) which has not already existed in an obscure and primordial way» (The Phenomenon of Man, p. 71).

And we argue that the direct creation of the spiritual soul falls directly under the principles of the Unity Law, which also govern evolution (see above mentioned pamphlet and elsewhere).

Convergent evolution can not by definition be explained by genetic heritage, but is a result ofthe response of evolution to common and unifying physical laws.

For although certain principles of wear and dissolution, which apparently can not be prevented from growing more pronounced with age, seem to be inherent in the structure of our individual bodies, there is no indication of any similar factor in the global evolution of a living mass as large as the Noosphere, where the overriding evolutionary law seems to be that, of statistical necessity, it must simply converge upon itself.

We have to begin to realize that laws and codes of conduct handed down in a time before science, before understanding biology and evolution, before our world was so grossly overpopulated, should no longer govern our lives, even if we otherwise subscribe to the faith.

To deny the veracity of the Theory of Evolution and its 5 laws is to deny the validity of the scientific method itself.

In fact it is more likely that evolution can continue indefinitely (within the parameters established by the laws of thermodynamics), and for all we know, the present moment may still be very early in the full unfolding of the universe.

Yet an atheist goes to great lengths to refute this theory while also subscribing to concepts such as macro evolution, that also lacks proof, yet is believable due to other laws of the universe.

That would be much more productive than Bill trying to promote the theory of evolution as an irrefutable law.

-- Oh I'm sorry was evolution disbarred in the science community and a theory that breaks the laws of physics brought forward?

For the umpteenth time — the Theory of Evolution is comprised of 5 laws.

Excuse me, it is the LAW of gravity and the THEORY of evolution.

If evolution is a law, as so many seems to accept, you would see apes evolving into human beings since beginning of human history and everyday of our lives.

Evolution has more holes than cheese, when you ask questions like, how did this happen in spite of the laws of physics, the answer is I do not know.

Well I'll go tell all the evolutionary biologists that briangut just discovered evolution violates the laws of thermodynamics LOL

What would a day be in the Divine circadian cycle of an omnimodal, omnipotent being, 24 hours, 24 billion years, 24 milliseconds??? Nowhere in the Bible coes it say that evolution does not exist within the living realm, but Simon Peter does say that to the I Am»... one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years is as one day...» (the Bible DOES recognize the effects of animal husbandry, which is a form of artificially - induced evolution on livestock species, and narrates accounts of Divine intervention to influence it, so you can not factually say that it is outside the realm of Divine probability by biblical accounts, as Divine probability contains, by textbook definition, the sum of the laws of nature.

The Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution can not be proven so they are not scientifically proven laws and are accepted on faith as true by some.