Sentences with phrase «law of supply»

When selling anything, value is affected by the law of supply and demand.

«The real estate industry follows the cycles and reacts according to the law of supply and demand,» says Alexander Karavasilis, president and CEO of Maryland's RE / MAX Advantage Realty.

Like the financial markets, the real estate market operates under the law of supply and demand.

Price appreciation is important because of the law of supply: as the price of goods increase, suppliers will tend to supply more of it.

Law of Supply and Demand works!

Do you spend a couple of hours each month studying the marketplace so you can see the trends or patterns that demonstrate the movement of the law of supply and demand?

By virtue of this fact alone, the law of supply and demand dictates that there is a downward pressure on listing commissions.

The law of supply and demand works here too.

Again I say Law of Supply and Demand says with fewer students ie the 20 % that make 80 % of the money taking the enriched classes will mean the current providers will no longer be able to stay in business.

The basic underlying reason for this is that real estate is the true manifestation of the law of supply and demand.

Remember Economics 101 — the simple law of supply and demand?

Simply, I believe in the law of supply and demand.

By Leon d'Ancona Real estate is a true and absolute manifestation of the law of supply and demand.

Setting a cap on the number of tokens is necessary because having a limited supply of tokens automatically increases their demand (according to the law of supply and demand).

However when virtual economies mirror real world economies, then law of supply and demand reigns.

The law of supply and demand is the simple underlying mechanism behind inflation.

And in a world where manipulation is omnipresent — on our cell phones, our email in - boxes, our shopping carts, our kids» schools and so forth — the immutable law of supply and demand makes authenticity increasingly precious.

The Law of Supply and Demand — not set in BC, as one of the many flaws with BC which I do not defend nor speak to, as that is the role of BC, not of me — sets the value.

The last element we know will work, not from the wonky and difficult to defend systems of cap - and - trade, but we know the carbon cycle to be marketable because we know the Law of Supply and Demand applies and works, because Capitalism works.

It's just that simple, and no value of climate sensitivity reduces that obligation, nor is the value of the risk dependent on climate sensitivity but on the price determined by the law of supply and demand.

Letting the Law of Supply and Demand fix the price?

If you remember only one thing about the AGU statement, it should be that only one response, only a carbon fee and dividend passed by Congress, priced by the law of supply and demand, can solve the problem.

Whereas conventional agriculture follows the law of supply and demand, organic agriculture follows what its founder, Sir Albert Howard, called «the law of return.»

administer a fee on carbon emission with 100 % of dividends to citizens through payroll and tax refunds, at a level set by the Law of Supply and Demand.

Free ridership would end immediately as soon as the Law of Supply and Demand is in full effect.

As for destruction of the economy, tell me, what should a fiscal conservative believe more harmful to the economy: obsolete technology propped up by corrupt governments, subsidies and tax gifts while a scarce private resource goes to whatever wastrel wants it for free; or, applying the Law of Supply and Demand to the scarce, capitalizable, rivalrous, excludable, marketable carbon cycle to let the democracy of Free Enterprise decide the right level of its exploitation?

Pricing carbon and turning over the revenues of its sales at prices set by the Law of Supply and Demand would give individual consumers more power over governments and special interests than at any time since Hamurabi.

We can estimate these things by privatizing the carbon cycle using the Law of Supply and Demand to fix the price.

and should be set by the Law of Supply and Demand (see, that depends on exactly two experts: the expert who is buying, and the expert who is selling, democratically, at the level of each individual transaction), So you are the «two experts» now, hence the agreement mentioned above?

Regrets are minimized by right - pricing the carbon cycle that Don Aitken has already recognized exhibits scarcity, by privatizing the carbon cycle and paying its owners — all of us, per capita — 100 % of the dividends from the fees as determined by the Law of Supply and Demand.

While I agree the level of the BC Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax is too low, and should be set by the Law of Supply and Demand (see, that depends on exactly two experts: the expert who is buying, and the expert who is selling, democratically, at the level of each individual transaction), and that the dividends are mis - directed and should go to every citizen per capita 100 %, it's not like I'm saying they're there yet.

C.) The price of CO2E ought be set by the Law of Supply and Demand.

Every retail transaction where a consumer buys carbon that will end up as CO2E will collect a fee set by the Law of Supply and Demand; every paycheck will immediately and fully disburse collected private revenues of CO2E rent to the owners of the air — every working citizen per capita, to the level set by the Law of Supply and Demand.

It is called the Law of Supply and Demand.

And your reference to the «Law of Supply and Demand» is just a bait & switch, intended to make people think it has something to do with free markets.

But you're not going to get anywhere by claiming that prices set by political football are somehow the result of «the Law of Supply and Demand».

S.R.E.A.: the carbon cycle's waste recycling service is demonstrably Scarce, Rivalrous, Excludable and Administrable, therefore it ought be privatized and traded on the Market with the price set by the Law of Supply and Demand, and the revenues returned to the owners — everyone who draws breath — per capita.

This demonstrates that there is significant waste in the treatment of fossil fuels that will disappear when a price signal for wasting the resource is sent to consumers; further, we know there are significant and readily available alternatives for energy to energy derived from burning carbon, and when the price is made clear and fair, the preference for these alternatives is amply illustrated in the Market; from these two effects we see that the Law of Supply and Demand is relevant to the pricing of CO2E, and not monopolistic pricing.

from these two effects we see that the Law of Supply and Demand is relevant to the pricing of CO2E, and not monopolistic pricing.

When everything being paid is taken and «returned to the owners — everyone who draws breath — per capita» you no longer have the kind of market the «law of supply and demand» is talking about.

The mechanism of the Law of Supply and Demand under Fair Market assumptions (the foundation of Capitalism) is that the sellers raise their price per unit until the next increment in price reduces the total units sold by enough that total revenues fall.

The Law of Supply and Demand works just as well for CO2E as for cell phone bandwidth or rutabagas.

The law of supply and demand has not been overturned.

And behind those prices is the basic law of supply and demand.

Collectors and dealers have come together to invert the law of supply and demand, making the nearly limitless pool of new works more valuable than rarities.

The Law of Supply and Demand already tells us that when there is a glut of supply (games) and roughly constant demand, prices will be pushed inexorably downward.

In online mode, you can compete with other players for the more lucrative routes and the best prices; the law of supply and demand applies in this case.

The law of Supply and Demand of miles dictates this.

I personally think that title would have been more descriptive of the idea behind Mileage Conservation; but the title felt too closely worded to the «Law of Supply and Demand» post, and so instead it was labeled the Principle of Mileage Conservation.

Wait one second here, are you saying that the law of supply and demand does in fact apply to plane travel and that ticket prices are actually higher on one of the busiest travel days of the year?