A savage dog attack which left a cat needing to have a leg amputated has prompted the UK's largest cat charity to renew calls to update
the law on dangerous dogs.
Following news that the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee has recommended that Defra extends
the law on dangerous dogs to cover dog attacks that injure a protected animal, which would include cats, Cats Protection has issued the following statement: «We very much welcome this recommendation and are pleased that the issue was raised in yesterday's House of Commons debate,» explained Jacqui Cuff, Cats...
Katy Clark (Lab, rabbit in the headlights) wants a tightening in
the law on dangerous dogs.
Not exact matches
On a regular basis city and neighborhood governments are looking at passing breed specific
laws relating to pit bulls and other
dog breeds that are considered to be
dangerous or a nuisance.
While it was encouraging that they were asking for submissions, the heading of the media release is, «Community views sought
on the
laws relating to
dangerous dogs», which wasn't encouraging, since
dangerous dogs and restricted breed
dogs are not necessarily or even commonly, the same thing.
The attack
on Roy McSweeney was horrendous, but the blame lies with lax
dangerous -
dog laws, the neighbors who owned thedogs and these specific
dogs, not the whole breed.
Victoria's Department of Primary Industries is providing information to Councils and the public
on the new «
Dangerous Dogs»
laws that we believe to be misleading.
On the contrary, these owners are acutely aware of the need for strong non-breed-specific
dangerous / vicious
dog laws, and they fully support efforts to strengthen and enforce those
laws.
In addition to educational programs within the community, Love - A-Bull also believes that
dangerous dog laws should be focused
on the actions or inaction of the owner, rather than
on the breed of the
dog.
«HB 97 is great for Utah because it finally means that
dangerous dog laws can focus
on behavior — both of the owner and the
dog — rather than breed or appearance.
On the bright side, many states (including New York, Texas and Illinois) favor
laws that identify, track and regulate
dangerous dogs individually, regardless of breed and prohibit BSL.
We support
laws that: 1) establish a fair process by which specific
dogs are identified as «
dangerous» based
on stated, measurable actions; 2) impose appropriate penalties for reckless or irresponsible actions by owners of such
dogs; and 3) establish a well - defined method for dealing with
dogs proven to be
dangerous.
«There is a better way: Research clearly shows that a more effective approach to dealing with
dangerous dogs includes improving bite prevention education and implementing non-breed-specific
dangerous dog laws, enacted to place the primary responsibility for a
dog's behavior
on the owner, regardless of
dog's breed.»
Basically, these plaintiffs wanted the court to eliminate any restrictions
on their ownership of
dogs including animal cruelty
laws, tethering restrictions, management of
dangerous or potentially
dangerous dogs, and restrictions for allowing nuisance behavior.
Essentially, this ruling now makes breed specific legislation in Ohio for anything beyond «purebred» American Pit Bull Terriers and American Staffordshire Terriers very problematic — meaning that they would have to go through all due processes and puts more pressure
on cities with
laws pertaining to mixed breeds and other breeds, like cane corsos, that declaring these types of
dogs dangerous without due process is «unreasonable and arbitrary.»
The city passed it's
dangerous dog law — which includes a ban
on «pit bulls» — in March of 2008, and it has been a huge black - eye and distraction for the city.
The focus of
dangerous dog laws should be
on the behavior of the
dog and the
dog's owner, not the breed.
Instead of enhancing public safety, breed - discriminatory
laws actually compromise public safety by requiring
law enforcement officers to seize or restrict friendly pets instead of focusing
on dogs whose behavior is truly
dangerous.
If this bill were to become
law, it is likely shelters would stop making an effort to the extent they have, to work with rescues to provide training and homes for difficult
dogs and simply refuse to release them at all because under this bill it would become the protocol not to do so, to have the
dog declared «
dangerous» instead. The shelters would not want to release these
dogs on demand and so would err
on the side of caution by having them declared
dangerous.
It could also generate efforts to make it easier to declare
dogs «
dangerous», make
dangerous dog laws more onerous,  or overturn the New York state ban
on breed discrimination.Â
The APDT opposes any
law that deems a
dog as
dangerous or vicious based
on appearance, breed or phenotype.
«RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges all state, territorial, and local legislative bodies and governmental agencies to adopt comprehensive breed - neutral
dangerous dog / reckless owner
laws that ensure due process protections for owners, encourage responsible pet ownership and focus
on the behavior of both
dog owners and
dogs, and to repeal any breed discriminatory or breed specific provisions.»
If you don't sell the
dog to rehome it at a large fee it will end up in
dangerous situation like labs experiment
on them, lie there are
laws against that now and frankly its a scare tactic.
Dangerous dog laws that are breed - neutral and focus
on the behavior of the individual guardian and
dog
The day before the holiday, Cincinnati City Council unanimously overturned the Queen City's 13 - year - old ban
on American Staffordshire Terriers and Staffordshire Bull Terriers and replaced the breed - specific
law with a generic
dangerous dog ordinance written in part by Ohio Valley Dog Owners Inc., an NAIA affilia
dog ordinance written in part by Ohio Valley
Dog Owners Inc., an NAIA affilia
Dog Owners Inc., an NAIA affiliate.
(See Losing in Aurora, pit bull advocates set their
dogs on us, Blue Buffalo, & Home 4 the Holidays, Christmas baby killed by pit bulls because Miami - Dade
law is not enforced, and Quebec introduces toughest
dangerous dog law in North America.)
More significantly, after pit bull advocates won legislation in 19 states prohibiting the passage of breed - specific local
dangerous dog ordinances, victim advocates have mobilized
on campaign budgets of nothing to stop the passage of similar
laws in at least six other states, as well as defeating aggressive efforts to repeal pit bull bans by ballot initiative in Miami in 2012 and Aurora, Colorado in 2014, winning the 2016 passage of a pit bull ban in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and obtaining the introduction of a proposed pit bull ban throughout Quebec province.
In summary, the ASPCA advocates the implementation of a community
dog bite prevention program encompassing media and educational outreach in conjunction with the enactment, and vigorous enforcement, of breed - neutral
laws that focus
on the irresponsible and
dangerous behavior of individual guardians and their
dogs.
The ASPCA believes that this approach — promoting education in the appropriate care, training and supervision of
dogs as well as state and local
laws that address licensing, reproductive status, chaining / improper confinement, cruel treatment and at - large
dogs; imposing civil and criminal liability
on guardians for their negligent and reckless behavior; and targeting problematic
dogs and guardians early with progressively escalating penalties — constitutes the most compassionate, fair, efficient and ultimately effective means of resolving concerns related to
dangerous dogs in the community.
In Oregon we helped pass a landmark
dangerous dog law and in Monroe County, Florida, we worked with residents and local government to replace an unenforceable $ 500 intact animal fee with a $ 35 fee, removed arbitrary restrictions
on animal limits, and made other changes that vastly increase chances for compliance and cultivate goodwill and cooperation between citizens, lawmakers and animal control officials.
Instead,
dangerous dog laws from now
on must focus
on what's said to be the more effective approach: regulating behavior, of the
dogs themselves and of their owners.
Her continuing efforts to draft and help pass legislation protecting children and animals resulted in local and state
laws She has trained over 3,000 professionals and continues training
law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, veterinarians, animal shelter staff and more throughout Georgia
on animal
law, animal cruelty,
dog fighting,
dangerous dog laws and
dog bite cases.
Some restrictions that various versions of BSL impose are: - muzzling and leashing in public - muzzling and leashing in cars - extra-short leash lengths - automatic
dangerous or vicious
dog designation, without any bite history - banning from city parks and beaches where other breeds are allowed - banning from leash - free parks where other breeds are allowed - banning completely from jurisdiction (although sometimes existing
dogs are allowed to stay)- special (i.e., more expensive) licensing and jurisdiction - wide registry - special tags identifying the
dog as a restricted
dog - mandatory microchipping and photograph - mandatory insurance (often one million dollars) for each individual
dog on the premises - mandatory signage indicating the presence of the
dog on the owner's property - mandatory secure enclosures (in some cases, mandatory chaining)- mandatory spay / neuter (to eventually eliminate the breed entirely)- higher fines and / or jail time if a restricted breed bites or menaces - fines and / or jail time for any infraction of any provision regarding restricted breeds - age limit for walking the
dog in public - persons with criminal records not allowed to own a restricted breed - ability of
law enforcement to stop owners
on the street just to check the
dog's status - ability of
law enforcement to seize
dogs without proof of wrongdoing - ability of
law enforcement to enter an owner's home, with or without a warrant, to investigate and / or seize a
dog
The
law requires
dog owners to be over the age of 18 to walk the
dog, have certification of training the
dog, obtain breeding records, always use a leash and muzzle in walks and must be in a fenced yard with clear warning of
dangerous dog, or
on a leash at all times.
But some pets can prove
dangerous and Lake County leaders aim to put teeth in a
law that regulates domestic animals.Pets and pet - related issues - from barking
dogs to pooper - scoopers to vicious animals - soon will come under the scrutiny of a group that will advise Lake County
on proposed revisions to its animal control
law.County commissioners recently approved forming an advisory committee to study changes to Lake's animal control ordinance.
A pit bull who was seized from a notorious dogfighting operation in Virginia, rehabilitated in Utah, and adopted by a couple in Texas helped make the case for a new
law in Nevada that prohibits local governments from enacting and enforcing regulations that deem a
dog dangerous based solely
on its breed.
According to the Web site, animallaw.info, the majority of these
laws focus
on dogs that some consider to be «
dangerous» breeds.
Through its national pit bull initiatives, Best Friends Animal Society encourages state and municipal governments to adopt breed - neutral «
dangerous dog»
laws that focus
on the key causes of
dog aggression — owners» failure to spay or neuter, train and socialize
dogs regardless of breed, or because they abuse or neglect
dogs or force them to live
on chains.
Delegate Cheryl Glenn will introduce an amendment to the state's proposed
dangerous dog law this week that would prohibit municipalities from banning or regulating
dogs based
on their breed.
California Assembly Bill 485, which Governor Jerry Brown recently signed into
law, will institute the country's first statewide ban
on the sales of
dogs, cats and rabbits in pet stores, starting Jan. 1, 2019, setting a
dangerous precedent that could have far - reaching consequences.
Animal Control resources are not infinite, and thus, as animal control resources are used
on an unenforceable
law that target
dogs that look a certain way, they take resources away from dealing with stray
dogs, irresponsible pet owners or
dogs that really are
dangerous based
on their actual behavior.
(b) Though no specific breed of
dog is inherently
dangerous or vicious, the growing pet overpopulation and lack of regulation of animal breeding practices necessitates a repeal of the ban
on breed - specific solutions and a more immediate alternative to existing
laws.
A «nuisance»
dog whose keeper violates the at large or leash
law would be charged with a minor misdemeanor
on a first offense and a misdemeanor of the 4th degree
on subsequent offenses, but the
dog would be registered as «
dangerous» after the 3rd violation.
Tonganoxie is at least the 19th city in Kansas to repeal its breed - specific
law, and the 12th in just the past 2 1/2 years as more and more communities realize that targeting
dangerous dogs based
on appearance, and not behavior, is an inefficient and ineffective policy.
«Resolved, that the American Bar Association urges all state, territorial and local legislative bodies and government agencies to adopt comprehensive breed - neutral
dangerous dog / reckless owner
laws that ensure due process protections for owners, encourage responsible pet ownership and focus
on the behavior of both
dog owners and
dogs, and to repeal any breed discriminatory or breed specific provisions.
The new
law sets forth a statewide
dangerous dog law, and specifically prohibits regulations based
on breed alone.
WBZ TV reports
on Angel Service
Dogs, a Colorado - based organization that trains dogs to sniff out the scents of dangerous foods in the same way that law enforcement dogs are trained to sniff out contrab
Dogs, a Colorado - based organization that trains
dogs to sniff out the scents of dangerous foods in the same way that law enforcement dogs are trained to sniff out contrab
dogs to sniff out the scents of
dangerous foods in the same way that
law enforcement
dogs are trained to sniff out contrab
dogs are trained to sniff out contraband.