Those concerns have something to do with various work I'm doing, however slowly, on eventual
law review pieces.
A fuller account of this vision appears not only this amicus brief, but also in these recent
law review pieces:
I agree that making the link with the Stanford
Law Review piece (of sixteen years ago, notably) is a very helpful move.
[9] For the latter proposition, the majority cited an American
law review piece that, ironically, is critical of cy près, and that recommends judges not be permitted to approve them.
The court cited remarks by Edward L. Greenspan in a comment on a panel discussion at a law school in 1984, a criminology article that suggests that the media can be a source of victimization, and even
a law review piece about the outrageous farce of the O.J. Simpson trial before the hapless Judge Lance Ito.
Not exact matches
Headed «The greatest Australian competition reforms in 20 years» the
piece works through the political context to the
Review, the «extraordinary» breadth of the review, the panel and timing of the review, the «likely appetite for further deregulation», possible agency reforms, possible «trimming» of the laws, small business issues and more - it runs for eight pages and is well worth re
Review, the «extraordinary» breadth of the
review, the panel and timing of the review, the «likely appetite for further deregulation», possible agency reforms, possible «trimming» of the laws, small business issues and more - it runs for eight pages and is well worth re
review, the panel and timing of the
review, the «likely appetite for further deregulation», possible agency reforms, possible «trimming» of the laws, small business issues and more - it runs for eight pages and is well worth re
review, the «likely appetite for further deregulation», possible agency reforms, possible «trimming» of the
laws, small business issues and more - it runs for eight pages and is well worth reading.
Also, in response to Craig Emerson's opinion
piece in the AFR Monday, ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, has an opinion
piece in the AFR, claiming the proposed changes to s 46 will help boost competition: Rod Sims, «Why the change to Harper Competition
Review law will help boost competition» (AFR, 4 August 2015)
It will be one among hundreds of
pieces of legislation that the governor must read and
review before deciding whether to make them
laws.
Response: an opinion
piece by Laura Laker accused me of hypocrisy, but our
review examining the
law and cycling aims to make the roads safer for everyone
In a MUST READ commentary
piece published in the CTNewsjunkie, Robert Cotto Jr.
reviews the flawed special education proposal submitted by The Connecticut School Finance Project, a corporate education reform group that has apparently violated state
law by illegally engaging in lobbying activities with Governor Dannel Malloy and his administration.
The
Law Revue piece, which Silverglate says was scathing, parodied an article just published in the Law Review that had been written by Mary Joe Frug, a feminist law professor who had been working on the article when she was murdered outside her Cambridge apartme
Law Revue
piece, which Silverglate says was scathing, parodied an article just published in the
Law Review that had been written by Mary Joe Frug, a feminist law professor who had been working on the article when she was murdered outside her Cambridge apartme
Law Review that had been written by Mary Joe Frug, a feminist
law professor who had been working on the article when she was murdered outside her Cambridge apartme
law professor who had been working on the article when she was murdered outside her Cambridge apartment.
At issue was a
piece published in the Harvard
Law Review's annual April Fool's Day issue, the Harvard
Law Revue, in 1992, just a year after Obama, who'd been editor of the
Law Review, graduated.
«180
pieces of pumpkin pie later: Blawg
Review # 34 Main Could match - making
law associates to the right clients make you more money?»
The Columbia
Law Review today announced the launch of an online publication, Sidebar, which will serve as a forum for shorter, more informal
pieces to complement the
Law Review's print edition.
Conor has published numerous articles in leading peer
reviewed journals on questions of international
law, in particular in the areas of remedies in international law, international human rights law, international humanitarian law and international criminal law including pieces in the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press), European Human Rights Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among othe
law, in particular in the areas of remedies in international
law, international human rights law, international humanitarian law and international criminal law including pieces in the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press), European Human Rights Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among othe
law, international human rights
law, international humanitarian law and international criminal law including pieces in the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press), European Human Rights Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among othe
law, international humanitarian
law and international criminal law including pieces in the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press), European Human Rights Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among othe
law and international criminal
law including pieces in the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press), European Human Rights Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among othe
law including
pieces in the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press), European Human Rights
Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among othe
Law Review (Sweet and Maxwell) and the International Journal of Transitional Justice (Oxford University Press) among others.
Professor Richard Myers, in a
piece entitled Restoring the Peers in the «Bulwark»: Blakely V. Washington and the Court's Jury Project, 83 North Carolina
Law Review 1383 (June 2005), explores the reasons why a seemingly unusual coalition of Justices came together to champion jury trial rights in Apprendi and Blakely and Booker.
Alarmingly the only mention to previous work on tribunals is to the Gibbons
Review of 2007 — a
piece of matchless political expediency — which told the world what it already knew (that the statutory procedures introduced in 2004 were a disaster) and produced the fatuous proposal that «employment
law should be simplified» without giving one suggestion of how this was to be done.
Supplementing high - quality academic
pieces with multimedia would probably be a first for student
law reviews as far as I know.
There are several criteria that people
review when choosing a
law firm, and ratings and awards are certainly a valid
piece to consider.
Ross E. Davies, of George Mason University School of
Law, has a brief
piece called «
Law Review Circulation» available on SSRN.
Mr. Roessler often combines his passions for writing and
law by contributing pieces to legal publications such as the North Carolina Law Review, the Charlotte Law Review, and the Southwestern Law Revi
law by contributing
pieces to legal publications such as the North Carolina
Law Review, the Charlotte Law Review, and the Southwestern Law Revi
Law Review, the Charlotte
Law Review, and the Southwestern Law Revi
Law Review, and the Southwestern
Law Revi
Law Review.
I also draw attention to the
piece by Valentina Vadi and Lukasz Gruszczynski on «Standards of
Review in International Investment
Law and Arbitration: Multilevel Governance and the Commonweal» [2013] 16 (3) Journal of International Economic
Law 613, available at http://jiel.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/3/613.abstract.
Last year, the University of St. Mary's School of
Law selected Jayne Reardon, Executive Director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, to write a piece about the possibility of lawyers practicing in an alternative business structure (ABS) for the school's law revi
Law selected Jayne Reardon, Executive Director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, to write a
piece about the possibility of lawyers practicing in an alternative business structure (ABS) for the school's
law revi
law review.
The Board Members may also
review articles prior to publication, ensuring that the
piece contains insightful legal analysis and accurately describes the
law.
The
piece identifies five of the most common PR challenges that
law firms and lawyers face, including managing the consequences of receiving bad
reviews online, trying to get traction for a firm -... Read More
Remember that you're not producing a
piece for the
law review: a blog post can be as little as 300 impactful words if they convey your message and serve their purpose.
Curiously enough the Beeb
piece didn't refer to a very stimulating and provocative
piece by the former Dean of the Loyola
Law School, John Makdisi entitled The Islamic Origins of the Common
Law -LRB-(North Carolina
Law Review, June 1999, v77, i5, pp. 1635 - 1739)-RRB-.
But for the sake of argument, let's assume for a moment that every
piece of software and algorithm used by governmental institutions like the
law enforcement or courts is properly peer -
reviewed and vetted under comprehensive regulations.