Not exact matches
The oldest
law school
in Canada, McGill, ranks just under U of T. Its highly regarded
law journal is cited by The Supreme
Court of Canada more often
than any other university - affiliated journal, and McGill
law graduates regularly make up a quarter of The Supreme
Court's annual clerkships.
Federal
courts have applied that
law more strictly
than state
courts, particularly ones
in California.
He has specialized
in corporate
law and corporate litigation, primarily
in the Delaware
Court of Chancery, for more
than 20 years.
Even considering this, only slightly more
than half of Americans have a will or trust
in place, leaving control of their minor children and their assets to state
law and the
courts.1
Florida's death penalty
law was
in flux for more
than a year after the U.S. Supreme
Court overturned the process
in early 2016.
«Attempts now to rewrite the story of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources, factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather
than the actual evidence gathered by
law enforcement and presented
in a
court of
law,» the spokesperson said.
I see nothing of Jesus
in the Christian right, but here
in the Bible belt,
in many of the Sunday sermons, I've heard more judgment handed down
in one hour
than I'd hear
in a whole week
in a
court of
law.
«Mr. Jeffs, although presumed innocent, has now been incarcerated for more
than four years on charges that, given the [Utah] supreme
court's opinion clarifying the law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote in the motion filed in Utah's Third District Court earlier this m
court's opinion clarifying the
law in Utah, will be difficult if not impossible for the state to sustain,» defense attorneys wrote
in the motion filed
in Utah's Third District
Court earlier this m
Court earlier this month.
Great — so, either these four young men never were abused, but simply saw an opportunity to shake down an individual with a questionable reputation (the «where there's smoke» strategy), and Pastor Long either caved
in to the pressure, or sought an expedient route (possibly used before) to make the problem go away; OR, these really are four young men who've been abused, but rather
than make the pastor answer for what he did to them
in a
court of
law, and spare other young men
in the future the trauma they experienced, they allowed their silence to be bought.
Local media
in the state, tonight, is reporting that ballot initiative SQ755, which bars state
courts from using Islamic or international
law, is on the path to approval — Yes votes outweighing Nos by more
than two - to - one, with about 40 - percent of the precincts
in.
Absent such a change
in canon
law, a bishop seeking to dismiss a priest will have to convince a canon
court that the case warrants dismissal, and thus the zero tolerance policy amounts to nothing more
than a declaration by the bishops that, because
in their view all cases of sexual abuse warrant dismissal from the clerical state, they intend to seek this penalty
in all cases.
So I shall use the word «appraisal»
in the remainder of this chapter, rather
than the word «judgement»; the latter fails seriously, for us today at any rate, because it is so tied up with notions of
law -
courts, assizes, and the other paraphernalia of «justice»
in the legal sense.
That I would be more powerful
in changing people
than fighting
in courts of
law.
What is more, they can be greatly helped if they see that this is indeed the chief stress
in public prayer or church worship, so that such social praying is undertaken by a family of God's children addressing a loving Father (who makes demands upon them, to be sure, but who is no hateful dictator nor absentee ruler nor moral tyrant, but genuinely concerned for their best development as his children), rather
than a kind of
law -
court or imperial audience with a terrifying deity.
Certainly Informed, no eveidence other
than numerous firsthand accounts, and thousands upon thousands of accounts that
in a
court of
law would be dismissed as heresay.
«Attempts now to rewrite the story of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources, factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather
than the actual evidence gathered by
law enforcement and presented
in a
court of
law.
In the Roman case, Coontz isn't entirely wrong in calling it a contract, insofar as marriage law would more often than not be adjudicated in the civil courts just like a contract la
In the Roman case, Coontz isn't entirely wrong
in calling it a contract, insofar as marriage law would more often than not be adjudicated in the civil courts just like a contract la
in calling it a contract, insofar as marriage
law would more often
than not be adjudicated
in the civil courts just like a contract la
in the civil
courts just like a contract
law.
If you're interested
in digging deeper, you might like knowing that Wake Forest University has published a short, objective Q&A primer on the current
law (rather
than history) of separation of church and state — as applied by the
courts rather
than as caricatured
in the blogosphere.
«A restaurant or similar retail food establishment shall not be liable
in any civil action
in Federal or State
court (other
than an action brought by the United States or a State) for any claims arising out of an alleged violation of this clause or any State
law permitted under section 403A (a)(4).»
In some European nations, there are more equal gender laws concerning public nudity but those nations have LESS sexual assault and violence against women than in the United States - so there is no legal rationale for this double - standard - it's simply an unconstitutional tradition that has never been challenged in court by ACLU attorney
In some European nations, there are more equal gender
laws concerning public nudity but those nations have LESS sexual assault and violence against women
than in the United States - so there is no legal rationale for this double - standard - it's simply an unconstitutional tradition that has never been challenged in court by ACLU attorney
in the United States - so there is no legal rationale for this double - standard - it's simply an unconstitutional tradition that has never been challenged
in court by ACLU attorney
in court by ACLU attorneys.
But
in reality the
courts often hand out nothing more «
than a derisory fine or a conditional discharge», Mr Thomas says - prompting him to call for a change
in the
law to ensure offenders can be sent to jail.
The federal government could, however, decide to resume enforcing these
laws any time it wanted to and the states would have little - to - no recourse to stop it from doing so, other
than attempting to argue
in court that federal drug
laws aren't authorized under the Constitution
in the first place.
Silver said he believes there will be changes
in the way redistricting takes place after the 2010 Census numbers come
in, but he stressed this reform effort might be easier said
than done, adding: «There are a whole bunch of things that are recognized either by
law, federal
law or the Supreme
Court that go into this.»
Old French
law dictates that the eldest candidate should win, but recently it was decided
in court that they would rerun an election rather
than fall back on the elder candidate.
The Second Circuit found that a new Supreme
Court decision narrowing public corruption
laws in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell required different instructions
than those used by Manhattan U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni.
«It is with great compunction that this
Court renders this decision as this
Court recognizes the benefit that such a
law would provide,» Judge Wright wrote
in his decision, going on to question «the wisdom
in the Mayor's zeal for the possibility of welcoming to New York City a business that would pay its building service employees less
than the prevailing wage.»
When they arrive
in court, many try to explain the treatment they received, but
in contravention of international
law judges typically asked them to prove the torture rather
than ensure the allegations were investigated.
It has been more
than 40 years since the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing a women's right to choose an abortion, but advocates say New York lawmakers have yet to translate the provisions of the landmark Supreme
Court decision into
law in the state.
«New York, by
in large, can always provide more protection of rights and liberties
than the U.S. Supreme
Court does,» said Vincent Bonventre, an Albany Law School professor and noted court - wat
Court does,» said Vincent Bonventre, an Albany
Law School professor and noted
court - wat
court - watcher.
It is, therefore wrong for anyone to claim that some of the incidents are motivated by religion, ethnicity, tribalism and elitism when we are living witnesses to the fact that Sheik Ibrahim El - Zakzaky of Islamic Movement of Nigeria and Sambo Dasuki, the former National Security Adviser are both Muslims and Northerners, who have been
in detention for more
than two years against all conventional
laws and
court orders.
Claims by the Secretary of State for Wales that the current devolution settlement does not need major changes are misguided and could help to entrench an unsatisfactory system
in place where the
courts become the final arbiter of
laws rather
than the electorate, the Welsh Liberal Democrats Assembly Member, Peter Black has said.
The way to resolve this is by way of a new wild mammals welfare
law that would address such situations and any accusations of causing unnecessary suffering would then be tested
in court on the basis of evidence, rather
than prejudice or ignorance.
«Who wants to tell the 80 % of music businesses that employ fewer
than five people, and the thousands of artists who self - finance the production of their own albums, that to enjoy the protection of the
law, all they need now is to have millions of pounds and spend years
in court to protect their work?»
The anti-hunting organisations, being more obsessed with banning hunting
than improving animal welfare, know that proving hunting to be cruel
in a
court of
law is problematic and consequently they oppose a far better wild animal welfare
law.
The governor, who insisted that due process of the
law must be followed
in fighting corruption, noted that disobedience to
court orders itself is a criminal offence that is more grievous
than corruption.
Even though we are outside the euro we are still subject to an unelected EU commission which is generating new
laws every day and an unaccountable European
Court in Luxembourg which is extending its reach every week, increasingly using the Charter of Fundamental Rights which
in many ways gives the EU more power and reach
than ever before.
The state's highest
court may soon be called to solve a debate that's been raging
in the town of Bethlehem for more
than two and a half years, which involves an electronic road sign and the local zoning
law.
«Anyone who has a case against any man of God should swear an oath, proceed to the
law court and face the rigours, rather
than engage
in media trial and character assassination, which have become the hallmark of this administration.»
It has been more
than 24 hours since U.S. District
Court Judge Algenon Marbley enjoined the Ohio ballot access
law for newly - qualifying parties, and no mainstream news media
in Ohio (or anywhere else) has yet mentioned the decision.
No fewer
than five police vans, scores of armed policemen and operatives of the Department of State Services were deplored
in the Kwara State High
Court in Ilorin on Thursday to forestall the breakdown of
law and order as the libel suit filed by the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, against an online medium, SaharaReporters, and its publisher, Omoyele Sowore, came up for hearing.
News International has agreed to pay out more
than # 600,000 to 18 victims of News of the World phone hacking, including Jude
Law, Lord Prescott and Ashley Cole,
in a series of settlements read out at the high
court in London.
According to the report they «sought
court - ordered evictions at twice the statewide rate -
in a state known for high numbers of evictions and landlord - friendly
laws - and frequently have done so less
than two weeks after a missed payment.»
«Having regard to the settled position of the
law as expoused by our
courts in not less
than five cases wherein the suspension of legislators by legislative houses was annulled and set aside, the Senate should withdraw the appeal filed against the judgment of the Federal High
Court in the case of Senator Omo - Agege.
Since he first ran for office
in 2014, Sen. Marc Panepinto, a Democrat, received more
than $ 74,000 from at least a dozen attorneys or
law firms that had active cases before his wife - state Supreme
Court Judge Catherine Nugent Panepinto - according to campaign filings.
It's been more
than 40 years since the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing a women's right to choose an abortion, but advocates say New York lawmakers have yet to translate the provisions of the landmark Supreme
Court decision into
law in the state.
In the State of New York, the Human Rights Law offers substantially more protection than federal antidiscrimination laws, because gender dysphoria is a recognized medical condition that falls within the broad definition of disability found in the state law, as New York courts have recognize
In the State of New York, the Human Rights
Law offers substantially more protection than federal antidiscrimination laws, because gender dysphoria is a recognized medical condition that falls within the broad definition of disability found in the state law, as New York courts have recogniz
Law offers substantially more protection
than federal antidiscrimination
laws, because gender dysphoria is a recognized medical condition that falls within the broad definition of disability found
in the state law, as New York courts have recognize
in the state
law, as New York courts have recogniz
law, as New York
courts have recognized.
That wasn't always the case though, as New York's blue sky
law was initially weaker
than that of many other states, until the New York Supreme
Court determined
in People v Federated Radio Corporation (1926) that the act's purpose was to «defeat all kinds of fraud
in connection with the sale of securities and commodities and to defeat all unsubstantial and visionary schemes
in relation thereto whereby the public is fraudulently exploited,» even if the fraud can't be proven to have «originated
in any actual evil design or contrivance to perpetrate fraud or injury upon others.»
However, legal experts point to an earlier appellate
court decision
in 2003 on the Suffolk Ethics Commission that found a county can impose more stringent ethics regulations
than those required by state
law.
In time, he was criticized for overreaching and being too eager to make headlines; more
than a dozen convictions were tossed out following a 2014 appeals
court decision modifying insider - trading
law.
In a ruling delivered yesterday, the court also granted an order of interlocutory injunction restraining INEC, the PDP and their agents from dealing with or according any facility required by law (regarding the gubernatorial elections to be conducted by INEC in Edo and Ondo states) to any other persons or group other than the Sheriff, Prof Wale Oladipo and Fatai Adeyanju - led NWC of the part
In a ruling delivered yesterday, the
court also granted an order of interlocutory injunction restraining INEC, the PDP and their agents from dealing with or according any facility required by
law (regarding the gubernatorial elections to be conducted by INEC
in Edo and Ondo states) to any other persons or group other than the Sheriff, Prof Wale Oladipo and Fatai Adeyanju - led NWC of the part
in Edo and Ondo states) to any other persons or group other
than the Sheriff, Prof Wale Oladipo and Fatai Adeyanju - led NWC of the party.