Sentences with phrase «laws about harming»

He can push through a crowd, there's no law against that but there are laws about harming people or forcing your way into areas you don't have permission to be in.

Not exact matches

Equifax's lawyers at Choate, Hall & Stewart had argued (among many other things) that the AG can't wield the state consumer protection law, which prohibits businesses from making false, deceptive or unfair claims, without showing anyone was harmed by Equifax's supposedly false assurances about data security.

When he had to squeeze extra floors into a new building, he called Sandy Lindenbaum, a zoning - law guru who called himself «the last of the gunslingers»; when he needed the New Jersey Casino Control Commission to see things his way, he turned to Atlantic City fixture Nick Ribis; when he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily harm.

Christian Concern has said that «everybody knows sharia law is discriminatory», however a Muslim interfaith worker who used to be employed by Blackburn Cathedral has said that Sharia law is about looking after your neighbour and not harming anyone.

It had to do with not upsetting Muslims about appearing disrespectful of Islamic law as that could potentially push more Muslim extremists to become active in attempting to harm the United States and its allies.

If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records to stop others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.

But basically under the new law, as I read it, the person who feels something bad has been written about him, has to show not only that the written statement is untrue, but also that it has done his reputation serious harm.

We are worried about the harm suffered by children in all sorts of ways in private law cases, which makes them unrecognised children in need.

How can they stand there in the Commons and talk about wanting to protect users from harm by not criminalising everybody, when at the same time they appear perfectly happy to continue doing just that to users of drugs already prohibited under the law?

A federal appeals court upheld a New York law requiring nonprofits to report identifying information about their largest donors to the state Attorney General's office, rejecting arguments that donors would fear «public backlash, financial harm and worse.

«The governor boasts about giving law enforcement the tools they need to make more arrests, but says nothing about providing people at risk of overdose the tools they need to survive,» said Daniel Raymond, of the Harm Reduction Coalition.

If all people are created equal by virtue of inalienable rights (those rights which don't come from government - see 9th Amendment and «inalienable rights»), then any laws must acknowledge the self - ownership of all individuals otherwise they are illegitimate (we know that governments are bad about this since they make arbitrary laws which harm people which violated no one else's rights but merely violated a law - like seat belt laws).

The law broadened the definition of banned assault weapons, increased penalties for illegal gun possession, reduced public access to gun permit information and required mental health professionals to report concerns about a gun - owning patient who posed a risk of harming himself or others.

«The governor boasts about giving law enforcement the tools they need to make more arrests, but says nothing about providing people at risk of overdose the tools they need to survive,» Daniel Raymond, of the Harm Reduction Coalition, said Thursday.

This legislation is about protecting our kids from harm, just like we have done with car seat laws and restrictions on smoking.

Meanwhile, Allen's career has not been materially harmed by the allegations; he's continued to make about one movie every year, working with stars such as Cate Blanchett, Kate Winslet, Jude Law, Emma Stone, Colin Firth, Justin Timberlake, Owen Wilson, Colin Farrell, Ewan McGregor, Hugh Jackman, Scarlett Johansson, and many, many more.

View key facts and statistics from the Vergara v. California trial, including information about Plaintiffs» witnesses, the long - term impact of ineffective teachers and the harm caused by California's permanent employment, dismissal and «last - in, first - out» layoff laws.

-- The proposals come amid concerns from civil rights groups about the potential harm of heightened law enforcement for students of color and those with disabilities.

But no, they'd rather break the law themselves in order to hamstring Amazon and not worry about anyone else (the consumer) who might be harmed in the process.

3/22/17 — Listen to ARL's Associate Director of Law Enforcement Lt. Alan Borgal talk about ARL's role in keeping animals safe and ensuring that those who harm animals are brought to justice.

If you read it you will notice that the task force study it to be turned in a year after this proposed bill takes effect (Oct. 1st, 2013, the study to be completed by 2014) but here's an idea for the genius politician who is doing this — how about you do the study first and then take actions based upon that before coming to the final conclusion (that arcade light - gun games are turning our kids into blood - thirsty killers) and passing a law that will most certainly harm small businesses in its wake.

«There's something troubling about a foreign corporation stating that Washington residents don't have access to Washington courts to enforce Washington laws to prevent harm from climate change.»

Friday's ruling is «the first time [that] a U.S. court not only recognized the extraordinary harms young people are facing due to climate change, but ordered an agency to do something about it,» said Andrea Rodgers, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center who represents the young plaintiffs.

That risky behavior is not acceptable because there is some uncertainty about the harm that will be caused by the behavior is clear from law around the world that makes dangerous behavior unacceptable and often criminal.

Read more at TreeHugger about biking scofflaws: 6 Ways to Diffuse Anti-Cyclist Road Rage 8 Ways to Create Utopias for Peds and Cyclists Do Bicycle Helmet Laws Do More Harm Than Good?

To learn more about working with the talented Nevada personal injury attorney at Naqvi Injury Law and how we can help you after you are harmed by an aggressive driver, contact our law fiLaw and how we can help you after you are harmed by an aggressive driver, contact our law filaw firm.

His optimism about the role of the lawmakers perhaps slightly underplays those areas in which people's lives are more likely to be harmed by or oppressed, rather than improved by rules conceived for hypocritical or commercial purposes, although he does address briefly the problem of the enactment of bad or wicked laws.

She has appeared in the following reported cases: S v S [2017] EWHC 1298 (Fam) involving a fact - finding about allegations of grave harm to the mother and the child and evidence from experts in Iranian family law; and Re: Rodwell [2016] EWHC 1731 (Fam), which centred on questions about whether the court had jurisdiction to make orders concerning the family.

Certain kinds of falsehoods (e.g. lying about one's military record in a a political campaign) are simply not actionable as a matter of law, no matter what, as the harm is not concrete enough.

Since A's spouse seems to know about the relationship and is unaffected by the information, giving over the thumb drive would not have any of the consequences outlined under the definition of «threat» in the law, such as revealing secrets, or harming a relationship.

Both scientists and legal scholars warn that failing to properly integrate neuroscience and law could harm the legal system by sending the wrong people to prison, and by creating skepticism about some of the law's basic assumptions...

As I've previously expressed here and here, I'm deeply skeptical about UCLA law professor Richard Sander's studies that purport to show that law school affirmative action policies harm minorities in the long run because many minority students admitted through preferential policies are not academically prepared and do poorly in law school.

We stand in solidarity with sex workers, keen and questioning law students, community activists, brave women who survive trauma and are stronger for it, harm reductionists, transfolk, people of colour, contrarians, and people who speak frankly about the deficiencies in the composition and conventions of our legal system.

Most dogs do not exhibit aggressive tendencies; nevertheless, sufficient provocation may tempt even the gentlest dog to bite.California dog laws are clear about dog owners» responsibilities to protect people from being attacked, bitten, or harmed by their dogs.

California laws are clear about dog owners» responsibilities to protect people from being attacked, bitten, or harmed by their dogs.

She pled that its governmental immunity was waived under the Texas Tort Claims Act (the TTCA) because the injuries had been caused by a property defect that presented an unreasonable risk of harm, about which the county had actual knowledge and she didn't, and for which the county should be held accountable under Texas law, as it would be if it were a private property owner.

If you have any question about this lawsuit, or if you've been injured or harmed due to the wrongdoing or negligence of an employer, please contact our Palm Beach and Broward County personal injury lawyers at the Law Offices of Aronberg, Aronberg & Green by calling 561-266-9191 or by e-mailing us at [email protected] to schedule a consultation at no cost or obligation.

If you have any questions about this important issue, or if you've been injured or otherwise harmed due to the wrongdoing or negligence of another, please contact our Delray Beach personal injury lawyers at the Law Offices of Aronberg, Aronberg & Green to schedule a free consultation by calling 561-266-9191 or by e-mailing us at [email protected].

Our Boston Yaz / Yasmin injury law firm helps clients obtain Massachusetts products liability damages for the harm they have suffered because a drug maker made a dangerous or defective drug, failed to warn about the risks, wrongly marketed the medication, or was negligent in other ways.

Our firm can advise you about the consumer laws relevant to your case and seek legal redress for any harm suffered under the law.

The NPRM would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information about a victim of a crime, abuse or other harm to a law enforcement official, if the law enforcement official represented that: (i) The information was needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim had occurred; and (ii) immediate law enforcement activity that depended on obtaining the information may have been necessary.

Comment: One commenter questioned under what circumstances proposed § 164.510 (k) would apply instead of proposed § 164.510 (f)(5), «Urgent Circumstances,» which permitted covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials about individuals who are or are suspected to be victims of a crime, abuse, or other harm, if the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and immediate law enforcement activity that depends upon obtaining such information may be necessary.

Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

In addition, under proposed § 164.510 (f)(3) of the NPRM, we would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information about a victim of a crime, abuse or other harm to a law enforcement official under certain circumstances.

The rules governing disclosure in this third set of circumstances are different from those governing disclosures pursuant to § 164.512 (f)(3) regarding disclosure to law enforcement about victims of crime and other harm.

Every person who by his fault causes harm to another is liable» I'm glad scholars are thinking about the law and linking it together, and I appreciate the insights, but the only ones which help when the court opens are the ones which will persuade a judge with a job to do, and no amount of precedent will do that on its own.

The Texas law (the text is here) is interesting not only for what it reveals about the business climate for lawyers but also because it provides for a civil remedy, creating a cause of action for persons harmed by the barratry, among whom are often, it would seem, lawyers who have had clients «stolen» away from them.

Criminal law is not just about punishing harm: the deterrent aim is to modify behaviour, hence the many offences which carry strict liability.

And we'll keep working with local community groups and law enforcement who are in the best position to help someone if they need it — either because they're about to harm themselves, or because they're in danger from someone else,» Zuckerberg explained.

The thing that is unusual about this case is that the normal definition of standing, which is the right to sue under the law, includes that the plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she has been harmed by the actions of the accused.