What did they all know about the worthlessness of the «corrupt skeptics» accusation in their current push to use RICO
laws against skeptics, and when did they know it?
Not exact matches
Those who push using RICO
laws against «corporations and other organizations that have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change» («other organizations» meaning conservative think tanks and any
skeptic climate scientist having any association with such entities) are likely emboldened because they've never before encountered push - back on the very core of their accusation.
where he argues
against calls for the government to investigate climate change
skeptics under the federal racketeering
law.
(Admittedly, that is unfair to the
skeptics like Ira and Willis who at least try to fight
against this sort of clear nonsense in violation of basic
laws of physics.)