Sentences with phrase «laws deprived»

LOS ANGELES — A California judge ruled Tuesday that teacher tenure laws deprived students of their right to an education under the State Constitution and violated their civil rights.

We passed laws depriving such men of what they had supposed were their constitutional rights of freedom of speech and press.

The Wright v. New York case was first filed in 2014, when nine families from across the state brought suit against the State of New York and others, claiming that teacher tenure, dismissal, and quality - blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their right to a sound basic education as guaranteed under the New York State Constitution.

Her story was a vivid reminder of how California's teacher employment laws deprive students of their constitutional right to education.

Last month, a California judge in Vergara v. State of California ruled that teacher tenure laws deprive students of their right to an education under the state Constitution and violate their civil rights.

This course focuses on section 1983 of the United States Code, a Reconstruction - era statute that enables private parties to sue any other person who «under color» of law deprives them of the «rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws» of the United States.

Because the new law deprives the plaintiffs and other members of the class of the «economically beneficial uses of their lawfully - owned property,» the statute «constitutes a «regulatory taking,»» argued lawyers Aaron Behar and Michael Harper, of the Behar Behar law firm in Sunrise and Puerto Rico - based lawyer Andrew Kagan.

Not exact matches

«Silencing our stories deprives customers and potential investors from the knowledge that our horrific experiences are part of a widespread problem at Uber,» according to the letter, which was obtained by Bloomberg News from the New York law firm representing the women, Wigdor LLP.

According to Abdo of the ACLU, Apple has a claim based on the Fifth Amendment too: it could argue that the process would deprive it of liberty without due process of law.

Senator Cory Booker introduced a new bill on Tuesday that would legalize marijuana at the federal level while encouraging individual states to change their marijuana laws, or else be deprived of federal funds.

Constitutional Amendment 5: «No Person... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;»

Constitutional Amendment 14 (this one specifically applies to Pan's Bill): ``... No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»

That rationale will be found, the court said, in the liberty guarantee of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment («No State shall... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law»).

«Slavery itself... is not at all contrary to the natural and divine law... The purchaser [of the slave] should carefully examine whether the slave who is put up for sale has been justly or unjustly deprived of his liberty, and that the vendor should do nothing which might endanger the life, virtue, or Catholic faith of the slave.»

And who as a whole who is out trying to deprive fellow Americans of equal rights or calling law - obeying people «murderers»?

It's not scientists as a whole who are out trying to deprive fellow Americans of equal rights or calling law - obeying people «murderers».

The fact remains, however, that the Vichy leaders have enforced anti-Semitic laws in a more and more strict and iniquitous fashion, depriving French Jews of every governmental and cultural position, imposing upon them all kinds of restrictions with regard to liberal and commercial professions, mercilessly striking many of them who were wounded for their country during the present war, and hypocritically trying to hide a bad conscience under a pseudonational pathos in which religious and racial considerations are shamefully mixed.

Anyone who would condone depriving law - abiding, tax - paying citizens their rights, is a self - righteous jerk!

Doctrine and Covenants 134:7 7 We believe that rulers, states, and governments have a right, and are bound to enact laws for the protection of all citizens in the free exercise of their religious belief; but we do not believe that they have a right in justice to deprive citizens of this privilege, or proscribe them in their opinions, so long as a regard and reverence are shown to the laws and such religious opinions do not justify sedition nor conspiracy.

You may think it all useless but if you think about it the field is highly interactive with law enforcement agencies out there, so if we have no information to study the various behavior types out there and what motivates people to become violent, the world will become deprived of psychologists which are important to helping law enforcement and hospitals identify people with such psychotic behaviors as this killer.

«No man shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.»

adding to that the Polygamy and Divorce laws imposed by some Religions and Countries has deprived those females the chance while married males are left stuck with one female whether there is love and respect between them or not but just because of children or religious ties..!!

In our own time, by promoting individual rights at the expense of nearly every other social value in family law, labor law, and constitutional law, we have deprived families, churches, and other forms of fellowship of some of their mutually sustaining influences.

Then, why there such a law to deprive them such right?

This new analogy invites us to place the originary expressions of biblical faith under the sign of the poetic function of language; not to deprive them of any referent, but to put them under the law of split reference that characterizes the poetic function.

It is true that the official class of the Jewish people welcomed the Roman rule, which gave peace to the land and, in the very act of depriving the race of its national existence, allowed the religious man to work in peace and live faithful to the Law.

When a deprived group raises its voice in objection, television responds by creating a suitable hero: a Mexican - American lawyer on L.A. Law, a female professional, a television evangelist.

Even the point about what is best for other creatures, which may seem very modern, is not without foundation in Hebrew Scriptures in such passages as the law against taking the hen - bird as well as the eggs from the nest (Deut 22:6), or this saying from Proverbs: «A righteous man has regard for the life of his beast» (12:10), where, be it noted, the quality that makes a man considerate of his working animals is not prudence or good business sense but «righteousness,» a point all the more significant when we remember that in the Hebrew Scriptures one of the marks of righteousness is not mere evenhandedness but active favor to the weak and deprived.

To the degree to which the principle of identification with the oppressed applies here, the church must stand with homosexuals against those sociopolitical structures that deprive them of the protection of the law and the rights and privileges of full members of society.

In Bray v. Alexandria Women's Clinic (1993), the Court examined whether anti-abortion demonstrators could be held liable — under the Ku Klux Klan act of 1871 (amended in 1985)-- of conspiring to deprive women of the equal protection of the laws by depriving women seeking abortions of their right to interstate travel.

For, he argued, «An Act of Congress which deprives a citizen of the United States of his liberty or property merely because he came himself or brought his property into a particular territory of the United States, and who had committed no offense against the laws, could hardly be dignified with the name of due process of law.»

The cancellation of the registration of a trade - mark does not deprive the registrant of such common law rights in the mark as he may have previously acquired.

It was made in a blog by Mike Law, a former Newham councillor, who declared of the surprising # 40 million loan offered by his council to West Ham: «It was a bizarre partnership between a deprived local authority and a failing football club.»

Even in a system with highly - trained midwives who are integrated into the establishment, unless everyone is legally required to maintain registers, do frequent refresher courses, and KNOW that they will be subject to supervision and if found to be non-compliant with regulations will be deprived of the opportunity to practice, even some of the most «highly trained» will try to get around the letter of any laws on the books.

My MIL once told me angrily that I deprived my brothers - in - law of the experience of being uncles because I never let them babysit (my oldest is still only 2.5, btw), in spite of my many times explaining that when I wasn't at work, I wanted to make up for lost time, and that I didn't * need * a sitter.

Depriving children of food or money, in order to make the other parent look bad, could constitute a form of child abuse, which can violate both family and criminal laws.

«No free man [homo liber] shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land,» says Chapter 39 of Magna Carta.

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will be proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

Martin's contention is that it is not the law that disappoints; rather, it is the subversion of the law by elites that deprives ordinary people of their constitutionally enshrined rights to education, health, tenure, etc..

I was reading about the SCOTUS decision on DOMA, and it said that they invoked the 5th amendment, which states: nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

Use the constitution and Bill of Rights to come up with criteria: Free Exercise of Religion Freedom of Speech Freedom of the Press Freedom of Assembly Availability / support for petitioning for the redress of Grievances Fifth amendment right indices: How many are «deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law?»

... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law.

Gonzales sued the police department for depriving her of her rights without due process of law, in violation of the 14th Amendment.

Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to [retard] the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racial [ly] integrated school system.

While it's true some people might ignore it, I believe most would abide with the new law and is it not more illiberal to deprive children of clean, poison - free air when they are in a car?

This law would also facilitate the approval of other mining projects, including dangerous cyanide - based ones, like the RMGC - led one, by depriving citizens of their right to protest by remaining on their lands.

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Under the old law, the LUC rate was totally inaccurate and retrogressive which deprived the State of keeping track of all economic activities that relate to land in Lagos State.

Ashade, who took time to clarify reactions in some section of the public on the new law, said under the old law, which had not been reviewed for over 15 years since 2001, the Land Use Charge rate was totally inaccurate and retrogressive and was depriving the State of keeping track of all economic activities that relate to land in Lagos State.

In Laws» case he was a personal friend and ally of Clegg and when recalled to the colours used his twin ministerial responsibilities to exercise influence and change — at education opportunity for children from deprived backgrounds and at the Cabinet office, effectively a «County» member of the Quad — Cameron, Clegg, Osborne and Alexander — along with the cerebral Oliver Letwin.