Sentences with phrase «laws of our universe»
Too good to be true is a law of the universe.
http://ibankcoin.com/
When the time is right, he leaves that reality for the bigger, truer reality, where he is able to see another dimension to human life, and he finds that he is no longer bound by the laws of the universe that once held him.
The law of the universe is driving it towards chaos due to human sin.
Creationists are saying that the physical laws of the universe did not apply a few thousand years ago and that this is some sort of test of faith.
1) everything is made of energy 2) energy CAN NOT be created nor destroyed 3) energy merely changes from one form to another; matter / energy conversion 4) if energy can not be created nor destroyed then it remains a a constant 100 % 5) energy will always remina constant for ALL ETERNITY, thus the universe either recycles itself, or never stops exsisting 6) you «idea of a god» violates the basic laws of the universe, thus he can't exsist because we do.
Second, We don't know if there was nothing before the big bang, we just know that right before the singularity the universe expanded astonishingly quickly and the laws of the universe and everything was born from that point on.
Well, chaddy boy, if you can show me in the bible (the only source you have that tells you about god) where is says that god exists outside of time and space, that god runs the universe which is why the laws of the universe exists, and many other questions, I'll be more inclined to listen...
Therefor we know for certain that the physical laws of our universe didn't exist, because our universe itself didn't.
We do not know how the laws of the universe came to be, but I asure you that you do not explain anything at all by saying that a god wrote them.
Cicero's reverential view of the old Roman constitution was as an enunciator of the jus naturale, the law of the universe of which the laws of man can only imperfectly manifest.
You have to be able to explain why the laws of the universe are in place and constant.
But given that there isn't proof for it and it claims to be able to violate the natural laws of the universe (which I also have never seen happen) allows me to reach the conclusion that there probably isn't a God.
Meanwhile we have believerfred that has his oh so supernatural god that can change the natural laws of the universe at whim; why because it says so in a 2000 year old book of myths, so there take that.
The laws of the universe can not be broken, but these laws themselves were observed and recorded by man to understand and predict the behavior of matter.
This is the law of the universe» that in the particularity of Christ we find the fulfillment of all our abstracted desires» for truth, for beauty, for goodness, for justice, and for love.
People tend to forget that God made the world and the laws of the universe.
quackaddict: Yet the laws of the universe that atheists use to argue this fact are in direct contrast to anything but creation by something or someone.
Yet the laws of the universe that atheists use to argue this fact are in direct contrast to anything but creation by something or someone.
Yet, when faced with the overwhelmingly organized laws of the universe; the incredibly organized DNA structure (that seems to mimic computer programming at the human level); many continue to steadfastly denounce the idea of creationism.
Yet an atheist goes to great lengths to refute this theory while also subscribing to concepts such as macro evolution, that also lacks proof, yet is believable due to other laws of the universe.
Yet, the effectiveness of math isn't any evidence for magic or a suspension of the laws of the universe.
The physical laws of the universe fall within very narrow ranges in order for life (or even matter) to exist, suggesting some level of design.
Though the most Deistic of the Founding Fathers, even Jefferson was not a full - fledged Deist if we accept that philosophy as having had two fundamental tenets: a rejection of biblical revelation and a conviction that God, having created the laws of the universe, had receded from day - to - day control....
@Chad «as an atheist, you believe that the entirety of the universe consists of particles interacting according to the physical laws of the universe.
We are not in any real position to assess the «probability» of anything which happens within the framework of the laws of the universe, and we deceive ourselves if we think we possess an exhaustive knowledge of even these.
He characterizes his view in the following manner (p. 107): «It shares with certain forms of idealistic metaphysics in a very limited and -LRB-[hope) purified way, a conception of reality and combines with it the tenable component of materialism, viz., the conviction that the basic laws of the universe are «physical.»»
The only true definition of god that is correct is the natural laws of this universe which comes to a disappointment to most as these are not sentient nor personal.
«Praying: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled on behalf of a single pet «itioner confessedly unworthy.»
I know that the laws of our universe as of now did not have to apply then, but I think there still would have been a cause and effect.
Be he secularist, new ager, or conventional religion guy the moral laws of the universe are not subject to adjustment or amendment by any of them.
«The physical laws of this universe depend upon destruction, mutation, conflict and therefore destruction and death if intelligent persons are to evolve in it.
A spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe — a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which with with our modest powers must feel humble...
So under the laws of our universe, it is impossible to have such a miracle.
The moment we diminish the Divine to a moral law of the universe, the moment we rob God of his awe - inspiring mystery, we have started on the road to sentimentalist religion.
We know that the stars are physical bodies whose motions are controlled by the laws of the universe, and not demonic beings which enslave mankind to their service.
God established not only the laws for man but the laws of the universe.
This popular scientific author goes on to say that physicists will eventually understand the basic laws of the universe, and then, «the existence of the universe will hold no more mystery for those who choose to understand it than the existence of the sun.»
... The problem has simply been shifted up a level from the laws of the universe to the meta - laws of the multiverse».
He, somewhat fancifully, proposes that it is conceivable that the laws of the universe need not necessarily be immutable, or defined «from outside» the universe, and he is looking to investigate this possibility.
But Hawking has thereby implicitly affirmed an ontological precedence of the laws of the universe, in as much as they explain the universe's emergence, over that emergence.
Unless it was a miracle, and altered the physical laws of the universe, that's not proof
Pity his observance of the laws of the universe is not drawing him closer to the ultimate lawgiver and greatest scientist, mathematician and physicist of all..
It is impossible to prove whether or not God exists from a scientific standpoint, because God's nature is such that he exists outside the laws of the universe.
Just as gravity is not the only law of the universe, so also, there is not just one explanation for why bad things happen in this world.
The laws of the universe which allow us to be here are perfect and infallible, whether we like them or not.
As I mentioned before, our subconscious understanding of the laws of the universe does not question the perfection which allows us to breath, drink, eat, and procreate, it simply understands that perfection because ultimately every cell division, firing of a neuron, lysis of a cell, infection etc. is subject to those laws, whether we consciously see them as perfect or not.
Our Western - scientific reaction is, «Tape recording is not magic; it is something we have developed by applying the laws of the universe properly.»
If we take seriously cooperation as the law of the universe, we will listen closely to what the people we serve are asking for.
It is not knowing that evil exists, it is the audacity of transgressing the Laws of the Creator (the laws of the universe / the cosmos / nature — whatever you want to call it) by making up your own definition of good and evil.
Cooperation is the law of the universe: this is the first uniting principle for a social gospel movement.