Sentences with phrase «lawsuit against public participation»

This proposed legislation would allow a party sued in a strategic lawsuit, or a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation («SLAPP»), to file a preliminary motion to have the suit summarily dismissed.

, no. 3, May 21/10) has an article on the first page crowing about the successful dismissal, under Quebec legislation, of an action found to be a SLAPP (a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) action.

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a claim filed against individuals participating in public debate as a means of silencing them.

penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.

He challenged the lawsuit on the basis that it was an example of a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, or SLAPP.

A SLAPP suit, or strategic lawsuit against public participation, is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.

By Jacob Damstra SLAPP Suits and Anti-SLAPP Legislation A strategic lawsuit against public participation — a «SLAPP» suit — or «gag... Read more

He explains that a SLAPP is a «strategic lawsuit against public participation,» a suit intended to censor or intimidate critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.

Awarding damages is a relatively new aspect in Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation actions, says Callaway.

(The acronym stands for «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.»)

S.L.A.P. should it mean S.L.A.P.P. or Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation?

It does have the characteristics of a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suit, a tactic to intimidate public interest groups like environmentalist organizations.

These strong arm tactics even have an appropriate name: SLAPP or strategic lawsuit against public participation.

«Michael Mann, who chose to file what many consider to be a cynical SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) libel suit in the British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver six long years ago, has astonished legal experts by refusing to comply with the court direction to hand over all his disputed graph's data.

Any attempt to infringe on that right, whether actual or threatened, will be considered a strategic lawsuit against public participation and treated as such.

In a July 3 decision, the judge described the lawsuit as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation — or SLAPP suit — noting that the plaintiff did not offer enough evidence that the statements were said in a fraudulent manner.

SLAPP is «strategic lawsuit against public participation».

(SLAPP means: Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.)

In July, Zenefits filed a motion to dismiss, citing California's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, aimed at preventing the use of legal action to censor critics.

This practice of legal intimidation, directed at both individuals and organizations who affirm traditional values, we label as SLAPP, for «Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.»

This, in my opinion, achieved the objective of the lawsuit that many call SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).

Looks like the warmists are getting SLAPP happy (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).

Recommended Legislative Measures to Counter Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation BC Civil Liberties Association (2012).

about Legislation to prevent strategic lawsuits against public participation in British Columbia

In a 4 - 3 decision, the court ruled that the Georgia Community Support and Solutions Inc. lawsuit against Shirley Berryhill can proceed and that her e-mails criticizing the organization are not protected by Georgia's anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute, which is intended to shield whistleblowers and people who speak up at public forums.»

This leaves Canadians vulnerable to strategic lawsuits against public participation through the privatization of fundamental civil and political rights in the judicial system.

In 2001 BC enacted the first legislation in Canada against strategic lawsuits against public participation.

«Developing a Response to Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.»

Danson said that Platnick's charter rights have been violated under Ontario's new anti-SLAPP legislation, which regulates retaliatory «strategic lawsuits against public participation.»

Anti-SLAPP (U.S. state law)-- provides protection against Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation («SLAPP»).

Twenty - eight U.S. states, along with the District of Columbia and the territory of Guam, have laws against Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs).

Having obtained dismissals of the 96 complaints, Jewish Hospital has now filed a countersuit also known as a SLAPP suit (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).

The defendant brought a motion to dismiss the action under the section 137.1 (3) of the Courts of Justice Act, which was implemented to prevent strategic lawsuits against public participation (the «anti-SLAPP» provisions).

In response to the lawsuit, Posters filed a special motion under Washington's «anti-SLAPP» statute, a law designed to help defendants defeat «Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation» — in other words, abusive and meritless lawsuits filed with the intention of drowning defendants in court costs and silencing their future expression.