When the Buyer was unable to secure financing to complete the purchase and thus terminating the contract between the parties, the Sellers brought
a lawsuit against the Buyer, the Buyer's representative, and the representative's brokerage, arguing that the Buyer had not acted in good faith in her efforts to secure financing and the Buyer's representative had not forwarded the Amendment to the Lender.
They then brought
a lawsuit against the Buyer's Representative and the Brokerage, alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.
The Buyer filed a multicount
lawsuit against the Buyer's Representative, Listing Broker, and the Seller alleging violations of the state's property condition disclosure law, fraud, breach of contract, negligence, and deceptive trade practices.
Not exact matches
In response to the
lawsuit, the Weinstein Company's board of directors called many of the allegations leveled
against them «inaccurate,» and said that «any suggestion that the Company or its Board somehow impeded or discouraged the
buyer's access to the New York Attorney General is untrue.»
The CFPB alleges that the firm operates like a factory, producing hundreds of thousands of debt collection
lawsuits against consumers on behalf of its clients, which mainly include banks, debt
buyers, and major credit card issuers.
Exxon this week hit back
against the California
lawsuits in a filing with a Texas state court pointing out none of the cities disclosed such risks to bond
buyers and arguing the
lawsuits were politically motivated and linked to cases brought by the states of New York and Massachusetts.
My debt validation letter alerts collection attorneys for junk debt
buyers to the demands for documents that will be made by a consumer should they make the mistake of paying the fee to file a
lawsuit against that consumer.
Mastrangelo filed a
lawsuit against the first
buyers and hopes to recover the difference in purchase prices.
California will require background checks for ammunition
buyers beginning July 1, 2019 — something that's being challenged by the NRA, which has filed multiple
lawsuits against the state's laws regulating ammunition and firearms that it labels «gunmaggedon.»
In my opinion, an unsuccessful
buyer in a bidding war could bring a
lawsuit against a seller or brokerage who comply with an escalation clause, stating that they only put in their bid on the understanding that their bid price would remain confidential.
The Sellers settled their
lawsuit with the
Buyers, and the trial court dismissed the allegations
against the Brokerage and Hopkins.
The
buyers filed a
lawsuit in 2001
against the salesperson alleging fraud.
The
buyer then hired her own contractor to redesign the septic system and filed a
lawsuit against the seller, Dean, the inspection company, and the construction company recommended by Dean to repair the septic tank.
The Georgia appellate court ruled that a fraudulent inspection report could serve as the basis for a
lawsuit by the
buyers against their agent, the seller, and inspector.
I was stunned to hear that 67 percent of the
lawsuits against real estate practitioners were brought by
buyers, many
against their own representatives.
After the transaction, the
buyers discovered that the homeowners» association had filed a
lawsuit against the developer about a month before the sale.
The nine
buyers brought a
lawsuit against the Beemans, the Company, the Lender, and the Appraiser for engaging in a conspiracy to defraud, fraud, violations of the state's consumer protection act («Act»), and negligent misrepresentation.
The
buyer filed a
lawsuit against the salespeople and the brokerage under the state's Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
Subsequently, the seller filed a
lawsuit against Maki claiming, among other things, that the broker had breached fiduciary duty to the seller by making false representations regarding the
buyers» ability to obtain financing and by misrepresenting the operation and effect of the home inspection contingency.
The
Buyer filed a
lawsuit against the Banks, the brokerage, and the real property owner.
When the
Buyer later discovered that the Property was significantly less than 15,000 square feet, he filed a
lawsuit against the Brokerage and the Listing Broker alleging misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty.
The
Buyer filed a
lawsuit against the Firm for the Broker's alleged failure to disclose the erosion on the property, alleging fraud and seeking punitive damages for the Broker's conduct.
The
Buyer brought a
lawsuit against the Developer, claiming that the Developer misrepresented the Neighbor's disruptive behavior and alleged negligent misrepresentation, consumer fraud allegations, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
The
Buyers brought a
lawsuit against the listing broker («Listing Broker»), alleging that they had a duty to disclose that the property had not been cleaned up.
An Ohio appellate court has considered whether a
buyers»
lawsuit against a listing broker over flooding on the property could proceed when then property was sold «as - is» and the
buyers knew of the potential for flooding on the property.
The
Buyers filed a
lawsuit against the Listing Broker and the Bank, alleging misrepresentation.
A Georgia court has considered a
buyer's
lawsuit against the seller and the listing broker over the misidentification of a property in a listing.
Two courts have considered whether a
lawsuit can be brought
against a
buyer's representative who is compensated by a seller's broker alleging violations of the federal Residential Lead - Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 («Act»).
The
Buyer filed a
lawsuit seeking performance of the purchase contract as well as filing a notice of lis pendens
against the property (this provides notice to potential purchasers that the property is subject to litigation).
The
Buyers filed a
lawsuit against the Seller and the Broker, alleging intentional misrepresentations as well as negligent misrepresentations.
A New York appellate court has considered a
buyer's representative's
lawsuit against the seller of a property and the listing broker over the seller's cancelation of the purchase transaction, costing the
buyer's representative a commission.
The
Buyers brought a
lawsuit against the Seller alleging failure to disclose, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and negligence.
Prior to dismissing the class action
lawsuit, the trial court severed Curtis and Gwendolyn Blough's («
Buyers»)
lawsuit against the Brokerage and allowed it to proceed as a stand - alone
lawsuit.
Q: Recently, some
buyers filed a
lawsuit against the seller and me charging misrepresentation of the property's condition.
An Illinois court has considered whether a brokerage could bring a
lawsuit for fraud and conspiracy
against lender and
buyers for failed transactions.
A Colorado appellate court has reversed a trial court's award of defense costs to a real estate brokerage to be paid by brokerage's seller client, arising from a
buyer's
lawsuit against both the seller and the brokerage.
He filed a
lawsuit against the former owner, the Listing Broker, and the
Buyer's Representative alleging fraud and negligent misrepresentation
against all the parties, and breach of fiduciary duty allegations
against the
Buyer's Representative.
An Illinois appellate court has considered whether
buyers»
lawsuit against a listing broker for incorrectly identifying a property's school district could proceed.
In 2001, the
Buyer filed a
lawsuit against the Sellers and the Brokerage, claiming that they had misrepresented and concealed material facts about the flooding problem on the property.
A Georgia appellate court has considered a
buyer's
lawsuit against her real estate representative and the listing broker concerning their alleged failure to help her discover a gas leak in the house she purchased.
Therefore, the court ruled that the only commission claim that the
Buyer's Representative could bring would be a claim
against the listing broker, not the Seller, and so dismissed the
lawsuit against the Seller.
The
Buyer brought a
lawsuit against the Sellers, the Brokerage, the Salesperson, and an inspection company, alleging fraudulent and innocent misrepresentation
against both parties for failure to disclose the property's alleged flooding problems and failure to accurately disclose the property's boundaries.
Following the favorable ruling, the Brokerage filed a
lawsuit seeking indemnification from the Sellers for the costs incurred in defending itself
against the
buyer's
lawsuit.
In 2002, the
Buyers filed a
lawsuit against the Brokerage and the Salesperson.
The Brokerage had purchased a real estate liability insurance policy («Policy») from the Company, which was in effect when the
Buyers filed their initial
lawsuit against the Brokerage.
A South Carolina appellate court has considered whether a
buyer's
lawsuit could proceed
against the listing agent for misstating the square footage of a property.
With the news of West Face Capital Inc.'s
lawsuit against Home Capital making the rounds, industry professionals don't think the former has much of a case, with one going so far as to call the litigation
buyer's remorse
However, sometimes the
buyer is intentionally mislead about how big or how small the property he or she is purchasing really is — and that intentional behavior is the basis of a fraudulent misrepresentation
lawsuit against a real estate broker, real estate agent, and / or seller, in which the victim seeks recovery of their damages.
The warranties associated with a deed, can form the basis of a later
lawsuit brought by the
buyer against the seller if there is a problem with the title to the property.
We find it hypocritical and anti-competitive that NAR is funding
lawsuits against Neighborcity.com when the company is helping facilitate exactly what NAR's surveys indicate
buyers want from an agent — help in negotiating.