Sentences with phrase «lawsuit against the state because»

Not exact matches

In separate lawsuits against the state, Michigan's Republican attorney general and Trump asked state courts to prevent the recount, saying Stein should not be allowed to seek one because she finished so far behind Trump and Clinton that she couldn't have won, even if some votes were miscounted.

Shortly thereafter, Daniels added a complaint in her lawsuit against Cohen, alleging defamation when on February 13 he stated in reference to claims of an affair that, «Just because something isn't true doesn't mean it can't cause you harm or damage,» implying that Daniels is lying about the affair.

The Cayuga Nation said it does not plan to file a lawsuit against the state yet because all the details are the agreement have not been revealed, but added that «the nation is prepared to pursue all legal means to challenge and set aside the agreement» if it interferes with the Cayugas» rights.

The Nation initially brought a lawsuit against the state in 1999 but said it was ultimately rejected by a federal court because a state under the Constitution couldn't legally be sued.

SYRACUSE, N.Y. — State Assemblyman Bill Magnarelli said today that he thinks Mayor Stephanie Miner should drop a lawsuit against COR Development over the Inner Harbor project because it could cost the community jobs.

Governor Cuomo says he won't defend the state against the lawsuit, because he agrees with the farmworkers, and says it's an «injustice» that «must be corrected».

Critics have argued that some tactics employed by animal advocates, including protests, risk turning public opinion against the animal advocacy movement.178 While these activities make up a small proportion of L214's work, they do organize and participate in protests and demonstrations.179 Investigations make up a larger part of L214's work and have sometimes led to a slightly different type of backlash in which industry and government respond by attempting to pass laws that target advocates, such as ag - gag legislation in the United States.180 While L214 tries to maintain good relationships with media and the government, and France does not have ag - gag laws, they have sometimes been the target of lawsuits by industry because their footage is taken without permission.181 L214 has sometimes suffered negative consequences as a result of these lawsuits, such as fines or the requirement to take footage down from their website.182, 183

In January, a lawsuit filed against Gov. Gov. Matt Bevin and Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles alleged that animals are in overcrowded county shelters that don't have enough money to operate because the state has failed to enforce the 2004 law.

Pet Industry Joint Advisory President Council Mike Bober said his organization was supporting the state - based small businesses, and he praised Christie for the conditional veto because Senate Bill 3041 «has an online reporting requirement that may be illegal — and, therefore, risks putting taxpayers on the hook for lawsuits against the state.»

«If these measures were to pass, companies will have no other option but to file a lawsuit against the state of Oklahoma,» said Yates «If you go bankrupt or they unload a project because of the economics of it, you also have the potential of school districts that bonded these projects — who's going to foot that bill?

If, instead of bringing counterclaims in the original lawsuit, the defendant brings a separate lawsuit against the plaintiff, the plaintiff could seek to either (1) consolidate the cases if they are filed in the same court system (i.e. a federal case and a federal case, or a New York State case and a New York State case), or (2) move to dismiss the new lawsuit because the claims were required to be brought in the original lawsuit as mandatory counterclaims, or (3) move to stay proceedings in the second lawsuit pending resolution of the first lawsuit, or (4) move to dismiss the claims in the second lawsuit on the merits if it is apparent from the face of the countersuit that it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted or was filed in the wrong cState case and a New York State case), or (2) move to dismiss the new lawsuit because the claims were required to be brought in the original lawsuit as mandatory counterclaims, or (3) move to stay proceedings in the second lawsuit pending resolution of the first lawsuit, or (4) move to dismiss the claims in the second lawsuit on the merits if it is apparent from the face of the countersuit that it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted or was filed in the wrong cState case), or (2) move to dismiss the new lawsuit because the claims were required to be brought in the original lawsuit as mandatory counterclaims, or (3) move to stay proceedings in the second lawsuit pending resolution of the first lawsuit, or (4) move to dismiss the claims in the second lawsuit on the merits if it is apparent from the face of the countersuit that it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted or was filed in the wrong cstate a claim upon which relief can be granted or was filed in the wrong court.

A legal defense in Hague Convention child abduction cases when defending against lawsuit for the return a minor child to the child's state of habitual residence because the child would be exposed to physical or psychological harm or placed in an intolerable situation.

The waiver stated that the doctor does not carry malpractice insurance and that by signing the waiver, the plaintiff agreed not to file a lawsuit against the doctor because the plaintiff understands that the defendant «will do the very best to take care of me according to community medical standards.»

Because California is considered an «at - will» employment state, the filing of a lawsuit or legal action against an employer requires a highly experienced wrongful termination attorney who understands these very complex federal and state laws.

A Park tenant's association as well as several individuals brought a lawsuit against the Owner and the Nonprofit, alleging violations of the state's consumer protection laws because the Form did not conform with state law.