Sentences with phrase «lawyer about your legal problem»

See N.Y. State 1049 (2015)(where a potential client posts a message on a website asking to be contacted by a lawyer about a legal problem, a lawyer may respond in the manner invited by the client); N.Y. State 1014 (2014)(where detainee communicates through another detainee that he desires to be contacted by a particular lawyer, the lawyer's response is not a solicitation, because the communication was initiated by the prospective client).

Not exact matches

Rendleman posits a hypothetical case involving a lawyer who's also a rancher: If an employee cowpoke happens to know the rancher is a lawyer and asks to come in to the rancher's law office to talk about a legal problem, that's ethical.

Lawyers who participate in these activities, law firms that participate, who become part of the thought leadership and who are seen by their clients as investing in thought leadership and partnering with law schools like ours to help to better train and educate the next generation of lawyers who are thought to be thinking seriously about the challenges facing not just lawyers of the legal profession but our clients, I think those kinds of lawyers will be rewarded because clients at all levels know that it's an increasingly complex and sophisticated and challenging world and they're looking for lawyers who understand that and can help them with their prLawyers who participate in these activities, law firms that participate, who become part of the thought leadership and who are seen by their clients as investing in thought leadership and partnering with law schools like ours to help to better train and educate the next generation of lawyers who are thought to be thinking seriously about the challenges facing not just lawyers of the legal profession but our clients, I think those kinds of lawyers will be rewarded because clients at all levels know that it's an increasingly complex and sophisticated and challenging world and they're looking for lawyers who understand that and can help them with their prlawyers who are thought to be thinking seriously about the challenges facing not just lawyers of the legal profession but our clients, I think those kinds of lawyers will be rewarded because clients at all levels know that it's an increasingly complex and sophisticated and challenging world and they're looking for lawyers who understand that and can help them with their prlawyers of the legal profession but our clients, I think those kinds of lawyers will be rewarded because clients at all levels know that it's an increasingly complex and sophisticated and challenging world and they're looking for lawyers who understand that and can help them with their prlawyers will be rewarded because clients at all levels know that it's an increasingly complex and sophisticated and challenging world and they're looking for lawyers who understand that and can help them with their prlawyers who understand that and can help them with their problems.

This is true whether you're talking about solving a research or discovery problem, sketching out a legal strategy, assessing the merits of a case, or performing a multitude of tasks that a lawyer now confronts.

One of my favourite things about being a lawyer is that legal work provides unending opportunities for problem solving.

But the law societies have failed to be proactive about unaffordable legal services, but they are in regard to the much less serious problem of incompetent and unethical lawyers.

I mean it's this interesting dynamic that we've talked about on the show before where there's for sure the distinction between access to justice and access to lawyers, and that you can have your legal problem or your life problem with legal implications solved without necessarily needing to engage a lawyer, so not all access to justice problems are access to lawyer problems.

Behind the scenes, this programmed with a series of questions, there's a logic tree, so depending on what the person's legal problem is, it'll ask a series of questions and those are all vetted with legal aid lawyers, and also ask questions about their income and where they live, which they can answer not, but answering those questions will, at the end of that, I don't know if you followed it out to the end, but it produces a little customized page of, «These are resources you should be looking at.

We talked about an access to justice gap, but what people are usually talking about is an access to lawyers gap because there is actually no gap in the number of people who have their legal problems solved.

I think that comes up a lot where lawyers, like many people, I don't want to make this just all about lawyers but it is a specific problem that we see in the legal industry where lawyers just want an answer.

I learned about the importance of medical - legal partnerships, where lawyers can be part of the team at VA medical facilities and I have learned that when lawyers are on the team they can often help solve the underlying problem that brings the veteran to the facility, such as homelessness and without the exposure on the street the veteran has a place to live, often they don't need to come to the medical facility as often.

Whatever the legal or business situation, our lawyers understand that clients trust and appreciate lawyers who genuinely care about their problems and provide them with effective and innovative results.

They have no choice, other than to do nothing about the legal problems that otherwise compel them to go to court without lawyers.

I guess maybe what I'm thinking is that by opening up the window, by learning how to code, learning what's possible, it lets you see a different way of serving clients and solving legal problems, and part of me thinks that, as new possibilities come online, new ways of serving clients by building tools that fix things, like this parking ticket app, like a service that allows lawyers to build a referral network that makes them look more like a giant, spread out firm, and other things, as these possibilities come out there, you can stop thinking about serving just one client's legal needs, and start thinking about solving that legal problem for anyone who comes to you.

Sam Glover: You talked about analyzing legal issues from TV shows, for example, which some lawyers do that and I wonder if that is helpful in sort of branding and raising your profile, but I wonder about it in terms of search engine optimization because people aren't searching for those kinds of legal problems and the kinds of people that come across your post if it goes viral, I mean it sounds awesome to get thousands or hundreds of thousands of hits on a post, but those aren't clients so I wonder how you think about stuff like that, you know kind of going for publicity seeking posts?

In this interview Attorney Zhao chatted the original intention to takeup the lawyer's occupation and talked about the development of the Chinese law.Both of them wish this interview to promote the improvement in the field of the international legal service and arouse people to pay much more attention to international legal problems.

I have started this Blog with two purposes in mind: first to provide persons with legal problems with information about what they can do to recover for injuries and damages caused by the conduct or misconduct of others, and second, to try to provide information to other lawyers about developments in the law in Massachusetts and elsewhere.

Clients are on Twitter, and they are talking about their legal problems — and their lawyers.

That goes to something we've talked about before on the podcast which is realize that lawyers tend to be myopic thinking about, «There is a legal problem and I have the solution to it,» rather than, «My client has a problem, one aspect of which is a legal problem that I was trained to solve in law school, but there's a bigger problem that I can help solve.»

I think they apply whether we're talking about individuals who definitely are under - served by lawyers today, but I think it goes all the way up to the largest clients, too, where there are large corporates that have all these legal needs that aren't being met because it's just not either packaged or priced in a way that works for them to get these problems solved.

In the meantime, the court may decide whether to allow the agreement to stand or not so you could be stuck with that bad agreement for at least several months and then pay a lot of money for a trial when you could have avoided that whole problem to begin with by hiring a lawyer to give you independent legal advice about your agreement draft.

When I've invited lawyers of different ages and stages of their careers to make guest appearances in my undergraduate course on the profession, big - law attorneys have spoken enthusiastically about tackling cutting - edge legal problems.

What is being published about the consequences of the problem is very negative: （ 1 ） the legal profession is shrinking as will lawyers» incomes, along with the number of law firms; （ 2 ） young lawyers can forget about those secure jobs and partnerships, and instead become independent «agile lawyers» available to help law firms with peak period workloads, i.e. become poorly paid piece - work lawyers unable to develop a specialty or secure income; and, （ 3 ） the rich will have lawyers and the very poor will have free Legal Aid services, but the great majority in the middle, being the majority of taxpayers, will not have lawyers to help legal profession is shrinking as will lawyers» incomes, along with the number of law firms; （ 2 ） young lawyers can forget about those secure jobs and partnerships, and instead become independent «agile lawyers» available to help law firms with peak period workloads, i.e. become poorly paid piece - work lawyers unable to develop a specialty or secure income; and, （ 3 ） the rich will have lawyers and the very poor will have free Legal Aid services, but the great majority in the middle, being the majority of taxpayers, will not have lawyers to help Legal Aid services, but the great majority in the middle, being the majority of taxpayers, will not have lawyers to help them.

Which lawyer on here actually has had a dream about their client's legal problems?

A collection of essays about improving access to justice... Closing the Justice Gap: some new thinking about an old problem... produced by the legal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birtlegal research company Jures this month, and published by the Solicitors Journal in association with the Young Legal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birtLegal Aid Lawyers was launched at our fifth birthday.

However, in nearly all cases, because those firms are owned exclusively by lawyers and are regulated exclusively by legal regulators, very little information is ever available about those firms and their problems.

Our knowledgeable lawyers and our experienced legal staff will be happy to answer any questions about our firm or discuss any legal problems you have.

2) If you are in the Portland area, join the Portland Legal Hackers Meetup to learn more about innovative solutions to legal problems faced by lawyers and clients aLegal Hackers Meetup to learn more about innovative solutions to legal problems faced by lawyers and clients alegal problems faced by lawyers and clients alike.

If lawyers were considered a public good — if everyone knew and could access all their rights, could easily build legal risk management and problem avoidance into their lives and businesses, utterly free from worries about the direct cost because we were all collectively funding it for our mutual benefit — what sort of legal profession would we end up with?

This question is being asked more broadly in Law Schools as legal academics and lawyers bring design principles to the question of where and how people access legal education, where and how people learn about law, and where and how people solve the problems that matter most in their lives.

-- You have a legal problem — You go to Lawdingo and enter your phone number — A Lawdingo staff member calls you back quickly — They ask you for more details about your case — Lawdingo (behind the scenes) uses its technology to forward your case details to relevant lawyers — Those lawyers decide whether to pick up the lead — A lawyer contacts you, and you're off

To be candid, if the real and potential benefits of providing legal advice include speed of service and reduced cost respectively, to achieve a positive outcome, which has ultimately come about via the use of sophisticated IT / AI at some point during the legal service / problem continuum, and as a legal buyer my main concern is the right result, quality, value for money and / or price (which remains the issue in many instances), and I know lawyers and law firms can now do the work quicker, smarter and more accurately using AI and cognitive computing technology, can I therefore expect my legal fees to be reduced?

And right now, legal hackers seem to be getting their projects mainly from municipalities and a few «thought leaders» within the academe — people who generally don't have the kind of deep knowledge about legal problems facing solo and small - firm lawyers and their clients that would be necessary to come up with a list of problems to solve.

More broadly, prior to being a lawyer, I used to be an avid reader of Edward de Bono's work on thinking, including vertical, horizontal and parallel thinking, along with his «Six Hats» approach to thinking, and would like to re-read his work with an eye to seeing how applicable it would be to thinking strategically about legal problems.

Last March, at the Legal IT conference I pleaded that lawyers should also be trained (or train themselves) «in innovation [by which I mean technological innovation]» and that, as a profession, we should therefore train ourselves to code and, more generally, to think about legal problems systemically and algorithmicLegal IT conference I pleaded that lawyers should also be trained (or train themselves) «in innovation [by which I mean technological innovation]» and that, as a profession, we should therefore train ourselves to code and, more generally, to think about legal problems systemically and algorithmiclegal problems systemically and algorithmically.

There has been a failure of imagination (on all sides) about a debate that tends to consider the real experience of people with legal problems only through their possible interaction with lawyers.

If you need advice about a specific legal problem, please contact a lawyer or legal clinic.

And there is a third problem — the result, perhaps, of the privilege and entitlement some (by no means all or even most) lawyers feel about their legal services monopoly.

It is hard to describe exactly, but I am thinking really of inculcating a mind - set or habits of thinking: approaching legal problems as a lawyer thinking about the practical needs of their client, as opposed to as an abstract, philosophical or intellectual problem.

Returning to the discount analysis, the problem remains much less about (i) the unit cost of lawyer hours than (ii) the number of units legal tasks demand.

Harrisburg, PA About Blog When you are looking for help with important legal problems, your choice of lawyer matters.