Not exact matches
Lawyers at big firms had online research accounts and solos
went to the law
library to use the books.
Gone is the
lawyer tied
to the desk or the
library.
The solution, my report argued, was
to provide specially prepared sets of legal materials in public
libraries and legal clinics and other places «so citizens can determine their rights and obligations without necessarily first
going to lawyers.»
He even
went so far as
to claim that «
Lawyers do not need law
libraries to be competent» (shocking, I know).
to put up with the way Overdrive works for public
library users, and that's
going to be a minority of our
lawyer clients, but it's my hope that it will get progressively easier
to borrow ebooks online and you have
to start somewhere.
In this digital information age, I don't think our «public» law
libraries (law school and law society
libraries) are the first place a citizen would think
to go to access legal information; and I wonder if our
libraries» maintenance of expensive print subscription services — like published law reporters and law digest services — is justified when these print resources are no longer used by our own «expert» users (students, faculty and practising
lawyers), are incomprehensible and effectively inaccessible
to the non-expert public, unaffordable, and increasingly unmanageable.
As I see it, Google's free legal research services won't put a dent in LEXIS or Westlaw, at least not for a long, long time, Â Instead, they pose a threat
to what I've collectively termed the «second city» providers like Versuslaw, Casemaker, FastCase or Loislaw. Right now, most
lawyers are able
to access those services for free or cheap through deals with the bars — but will bars continue
to support those subscriptions when there's a robust free option available? My heart
goes out
to these companies because they served as an oasis for solos when no other options, save the law
library and manual research, existed. Yet I don't see all of them able
to survive the Google onslaught.
And members of the public who want
to look up what their
lawyer or paralegal has
to comply with have
to pay $ 1500 or
go to a public
library in a large city, because their town doesn't have a copy.
It's hard
to get young
lawyers to move away from their desktops
to the
library, and for librarians
to know how they are
going about their research.
A law librarian resume objective is written by a person looking for a job as a law librarian where he or she can provide
lawyers and low students with information related
to previous cases and other important documents by
going through the records kept in the
library.