Sentences with phrase «lawyer in question»

Among other salacious allegations, the Board wrote that not one but two women testified that the divorce lawyer in question responded to their inquiries as to how much they owed him for his work by closing the office blinds and telling them his fees could be paid on his «couch of restitution.»

The Ontario lawyer in question had sent a letter to one of Laarakker's clients demanding that she pay for «losses» arising from a shoplifting incident involving her daughter.

Particularly when the budding lawyers in question were all coming — initially at least — into the local market at a time when most firms were trying to chase growth in global currencies rather than in the pound.

The lawyer in question, Keith Wyatt, won a case for the school district, absolving it from damages, but the way he argued it continues to cause a lot of...

It also offers a more complete digital picture of the lawyer in question.

More often, the lawyer in question is a senior associate or mid-level partner who gets the idea and who really does want to contribute content to the firm's blog — but when it comes to the crunch, sends you nothing but her regrets, along with (perfectly valid) reasons why she can't get a post done this month.

The lawyer in question had been practicing for over 60 years, which is quite an accomplishment in itself.

Admittedly, that headline is misleading, given that the lawyer in question is not just any lawyer but former presidential candidate Sen. John Edwards and that the principle at issue has nothing to do with the student's love of the legal profession.

In other words, get to know the lawyer in question, and then decide if that person is qualified.

Quite simply they are not happy to pay a certain rate just because the lawyer in question has a certain level of PQE.

It's quite likely the lawyer in question did not mean to call «unfortunate» his or her firm's decision to honor the birthday of a great American like Martin Luther King, Jr..

It's quite likely the lawyer in question did not mean to call «unfortunate» his or her firm's decision to honor the birthday of a great American like -LSB-...]

When King gets a subpoena, he generally contacts the lawyer in question to find out their theory of the case.

Consider the level of academic qualification of the lawyer in question.

In a couple of the instances of «replace non-lawyer with lawyer» that I have witnessed, where the lawyer in question has been a partner, it has been justified by reference to the need to ensure that partners are better engaged with the critical management activities of the firm.

The lawyer in question was providing duty counsel services through the Sykes Corp., which has a contract with legal aid to assist clients via the Brydges hotline, according to LAO.

The very worst case scenarios I've seen are when written or oral agreements are phrased in such a way as to fail in achieving what the lawyer wants, even when the other party is prepared to give it to them, and when the lawyer in question can't understand the law they're reading.

When I recount the above scenarios to lawyers I am sometimes met with a comment or two about «coddling» or some expression that the lawyer in question had to figure things out for themselves so why shouldn't their junior.

Not so difficult when the lawyers in question is a respected, prestigious firm with experience in national security issues, but could be a bit more controversial if the court - appointed lawyers were, say, native Arabic speakers with a little bit too much, culturally, in common with the defendant for the folks watching the 6 - o - clock news to be comfortable with.

And if there are records, you will have to parse the decisions to find out if the lawyer in question was actually involved.

(It takes a considerable amount of time to solve a case in the most advantageous way for a client, so if the lawyer in question says «only a few months,» then this person is either lying or not planning to take your case to court.)